To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The scientific article examines the problems of the operation of legal mechanisms for the recovery of funds related to the military aggression of the occupying State. The national legislation of Ukraine notes the expediency of the court procedure in such cases according to the rules of civil procedure since the talk is about civil legal relations. Such legal relations are usually considered by courts of civil jurisdiction regarding litigation related to compensation for damages and material losses caused by Russian aggression. At the same time, civil proceedings cannot be recognized as the only procedure for restoring violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests committed during military aggression. In this regard, the paper notes the importance of determining the court jurisdiction and jurisdiction of such cases, developing the rules of evidence and ensuring the right to professional legal assistance, as well as procedures for executing court decisions. At the same time, the peculiarities of providing legal assistance in the conditions of martial law and the difficulties faced by the interested persons are characterized. It is noted that the institution of reparations should not be considered sufficiently developed in international legal regulations and the national legislation of the State that suffered from military aggression.
The study systematically investigated the key biological and ecological characteristics of Cyamophila willeti, a major pest of the tree species Styphnolobium japonicum. We focused on its circadian mating rhythm, oviposition preference, and the effects of temperature on population parameters. Using the age-stage, two-sex life table approach, we compared the development, reproduction, and population growth potential under different temperature conditions. Results showed that mating activity peaked at 12:00 and 17:00, with females significantly preferring shoot tips for oviposition. At 25°C, female and male adult longevities were 39.88 ± 0.93 and 46.71 ± 1.69 days, respectively, and the mean fecundity per female was 647.75 ± 52.94 eggs. At 29°C, longevity was significantly reduced to 11.88 ± 4.10 days for females and 13.89 ± 4.31 days for males, while fecundity decreased to 47.63 ± 4.26 eggs. Most nymphs did not develop beyond the fifth instar at 33°C. These findings indicate that the optimal temperature for population growth of C. willeti is around 25°C, whereas high temperatures (≥29°C) significantly suppress survival and reproduction. This study establishes a foundation for monitoring C. willeti and developing effective control strategies.
This article examines the interrelations between the political economies of the Ottoman Empire and the administration of justice for European merchants in Ottoman cities during the seventeenth century. By focusing on the sultan’s court of justice, the Imperial Council (divan-ı hümayun), and the Venetian merchants who appealed to it, this piece illustrates how Ottoman commercial interests and political concerns influenced the production and application of Islamic law (Sharia) in Ottoman courts for European merchants. To promote international trade, Ottoman political and legal authorities introduced new norms and procedures in matters of legal evidence and court jurisdiction in commercial cases between Venetian and Ottoman subjects, and they encouraged settlements in favor of foreign merchants and Ottoman-Venetian trade. These politics of justice, I argue, demonstrate the dynamism of the Ottoman legal system in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, a period characterized by global commercial development and Ottoman military and political ascendancy in the Mediterranean.
During the first half of the 20th century, Brazilian Protestants turned to their pens and periodicals to defend the legitimacy and beneficial nature of their presence in a majority Catholic nation. This period—spanning Brazil’s first republic, Getúlio Vargas’s authoritarian Estado novo, and the developmentalist era of Juscelino Kubitschek (1956–1961)—witnessed several regime changes and new national constitutions. Amid these political shifts, the Brazilian Catholic church sought to increase its cultural and symbolic dominance in the country. Meanwhile, several Brazilian Protestant groups came together to form the Confederação Evangélica do Brasil (CEB) in 1934, both to coordinate Protestant educational and social work and defend freedom of Protestant religious expression. With their denominational roots in Brazil extending less than one hundred years and their ties to US mission boards making them appear suspiciously foreign, Brazilian Protestants vehemently defended their patriotism. Relying on the writings of many CEB leaders, the organization’s periodical Unum corpus, and biannual reports, I argue that the Brazilian ecumenical leaders used several strategies to create a rhetorical defense of Brazilian Protestant legitimacy. They expressed occasional appreciation for Brazilian Catholics, celebrated Brazilian Protestant history and public recognition of contemporary Brazilian Protestants, and stridently opposed Catholic attempts to achieve cultural or social dominance. I also argue that because they maintained a constant defensive posture, the Brazilian Protestant ecumenists of the 1930s–1950s embraced a vision of ecumenism that explicitly excluded Roman Catholicism.