To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We study universal-existential fragments of first-order theories of fields, in particular of function fields and of equicharacteristic henselian valued fields. For example, we discuss to what extent the theory of a field k determines the universal-existential theories of the rational function field over k and of the field of Laurent series over k, and we find various many-one reductions between such fragments.
Dedicated to the memory of Alexander Prestel (1941–2024)
Mixture of experts is a prediction aggregation method in machine learning that aggregates the predictions of specialized experts. This method often outperforms Bayesian methods despite the Bayesian having stronger inductive guarantees. We argue that this is due to the greater functional capacity of mixture of experts. We prove that in a limiting case of mixture of experts will have greater capacity than equivalent Bayesian methods, which we vouchsafe through experiments on non-limiting cases. Finally, we conclude that mixture of experts is a type of abductive reasoning in the Peircean sense of hypothesis construction.
Based on the topological degree theory, we present some atypical bifurcation results in the sense of Prodi–Ambrosetti, i.e., bifurcation of T-periodic solutions from λ = 0. Finally, we propose some applications to Liénard-type equations.
Dedicated to Professor Maria Patrizia Pera on the occasion of her 70th birthday
The symptoms of anxiety in the outbreak of COVID-19 were so severe that they entered the research literature as the term COVID-19 anxiety. This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to identify the variables related to COVID-19 anxiety and the effectiveness of psychological interventions on it.
Methods
In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, the literature was systematically searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, ISI, and Persian databases such as Noormags and SID on COVID-19 anxiety from January 2020 to April 2022. In the initial search, 105 articles were found. In the data correlation section, 13 studies for the fixed effects model were meta-analyzed. In the interventional section, 14 articles were selected. The systematic review data were extracted, and all statistical data were analyzed by CMA-2.
Results
The results of the meta-analyses for psychopathological correlations with COVID-19 anxiety in 13 articles indicated the correlation between COVID-19 anxiety and other mental states and disorders (P = .0001/I2 = 97.27%). Other findings demonstrated the effect of psychological interventions on COVID-19 anxiety in 14 articles with high effectiveness of these treatments (P = .00/I2 = 85.67%).
Conclusions
It seems COVID-19 anxiety is affected by psychological variables. Hence, psychological interventions represent effective treatments for anxiety due to COVID-19.
Introduced over a century ago, Whittaker–Henderson smoothing remains widely used by actuaries in constructing one-dimensional and two-dimensional experience tables for mortality, disability, and other life insurance risks. In this paper, we reinterpret this smoothing technique within a modern statistical framework and address six practically relevant questions about its use. First, we adopt a Bayesian perspective on this method to construct credible intervals. Second, in the context of survival analysis, we clarify how to choose the observation and weight vectors by linking the smoothing technique to a maximum likelihood estimator. Third, we improve accuracy by relaxing the method’s reliance on an implicit normal approximation. Fourth, we select the smoothing parameters by maximizing a marginal likelihood function. Fifth, we improve computational efficiency when dealing with numerous observation points and consequently parameters. Finally, we develop an extrapolation procedure that ensures consistency between estimated and predicted values through constraints.
For cardinals $\mathfrak {a}$ and $\mathfrak {b}$, we write $\mathfrak {a}=^\ast \mathfrak {b}$ if there are sets A and B of cardinalities $\mathfrak {a}$ and $\mathfrak {b}$, respectively, such that there are partial surjections from A onto B and from B onto A. $=^\ast $-equivalence classes are called surjective cardinals. In this article, we show that $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}_\kappa $, where $\kappa $ is a fixed aleph, cannot prove that surjective cardinals form a cardinal algebra, which gives a negative solution to a question proposed by Truss [J. Truss, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 27, 165–207 (1984)]. Nevertheless, we show that surjective cardinals form a “surjective cardinal algebra”, whose postulates are almost the same as those of a cardinal algebra, except that the refinement postulate is replaced by the finite refinement postulate. This yields a smoother proof of the cancellation law for surjective cardinals, which states that $m\cdot \mathfrak {a}=^\ast m\cdot \mathfrak {b}$ implies $\mathfrak {a}=^\ast \mathfrak {b}$ for all cardinals $\mathfrak {a},\mathfrak {b}$ and all nonzero natural numbers m.
High body mass index (BMI) is an important risk factor for female colon and rectal, ovarian, and uterine cancers. Current comprehensive studies on its effects on these cancers are limited. This paper aims to explore regional and age differences in the impact of high BMI on these cancers and the commonalities among the three by using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021. Deaths, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and their age-standardized rates (ASRs) for these cancers were retrieved from 1990 to 2021, and burden trends were assessed using the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) and percentage changes. The study also analyzed the correlation between ASR and socio-demographic index (SDI) across 21 regions and projected future disease burden trends using the Bayesian Age-Period-model (BAPC) model. Results showed that the global burden of female colon and rectal cancer declined since 1990 but remained at the highest level among the three cancers in 2021. At the same time, these three cancers had high burdens in high-income areas. Since 1990, ovarian and uterine cancer burdens attributable to high BMI increased, and all three burdens grew fastest in low-middle-income regions and among younger people. The burden of all three is projected to continue increasing through 2050. This study confirms that high BMI’s impact on these cancers is regional and age-specific, with long-term effects. Therefore, subsequent public health interventions should adopt more targeted obesity prevention and control strategies based on national and regional situations to effectively mitigate the adverse effects of high BMI on these cancers.
This paper advocates for a pragmatist view on quantum theory, offering a response to David Wallace’s recent criticisms of Richard Healey’s quantum pragmatism. In particular, I challenge Wallace’s general claim that quantum pragmatists—and anti-representationalists more broadly—lack the resources to make sense of the novel ‘quantum’ language used throughout modern physics in applications of quantum theory. I conclude by posing a challenge to quantum representationalists.
This guide is for authors who are preparing papers for the Philosophy of Science Association journal using the LATEX document preparation system and the CUP PSA style file.
Age is the main risk factor for many neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and frontotemporal dementia. Despite our limited understanding of cellular mechanisms of aging-associated neuronal loss, an increasing number of studies demonstrate that oxidative stress and inflammation are key drivers. Epidemiological studies indicate that diet during middle adulthood can influence the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases later in life, so it is important to investigate dietary interventions to combat oxidative stress and inflammation. In this study, we hypothesized that treatment with fucoxanthin, a marine carotenoid with strong antioxidant properties, prevents aging-associated oxidative stress that is known to be related to natural brain aging. Treatment with fucoxanthin protected rat primary hippocampal neurons against oxidative stress and aging in vitro. In our in vivo study, middle-aged male Sprague-Dawley rats were gavaged with fucoxanthin (1 mg/kg, 5 days/week, n=6) or vehicle (n=6) for 4 weeks. After supplementation was completed, brain samples were harvested and subjected to quantitative and bioinformatic analyses. Fucoxanthin was detected and shown to decrease lipid peroxidation in the brains of the animals supplemented with fucoxanthin. Microarray analysis showed that treatment with fucoxanthin changed 5602 genes. Together, our results suggest that treatment with fucoxanthin prevents aging-associated oxidative stress and is capable of regulating genes that potentially ameliorate age-related changes to the brain.
Spacetime singularities are expected to disappear in quantum gravity. Singularity resolution prima facie supports the view that spacetime singularities are mathematical pathologies of gen- eral relativity. However, this conclusion might be premature. Spacetime singularities are more accurately understood as global properties of spacetime, rather than things. Therefore, if space- time emerges in quantum gravity – as it is often claimed – then so may its singular structure. Although this proposal is intriguing, the attempt to uphold that spacetime singularities may be emergent fails. I provide three arguments in support of this claim, drawing upon different views on spacetime emergence.
Galaxy clusters are commonly used tracers of cosmology. Gravitational lensing analysis of the Bullet Cluster is claimed to evidentially support dark matter, an important component in the ΛCDM cosmology. I argue that such ΛCDM-based models of individual galaxy clusters should be explanatory to meet such claims, but hardly in an ontic sense, due to galaxy cluster anisotropies, empirically equivalent non-ΛCDM-based models, and currently unaccountable cases. I propose that adopting an alternative epistemic/representational conception of scientific explanation can maintain the explanatory nature of individual galaxy cluster models, cope with the three complications, and be potentially generalizable to other branches of astrophysics.