To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Origen’s surprising presence within David F. Strauss’s genealogy of the critical examination of the life of Jesus ought to stir contemporary readers from slipping into their own forms of presumption regarding when, exactly, reading of the Gospels first became critical or what the term “critical” even means. Strauss’s presentation also underscores the difficulty of fashioning a portrait adequate to such a unique figure and introduces the need to retrieve Origen’s own first principles of Gospel reading. Here, I lay the requisite groundwork for addressing Part I’s overarching question (“What is a Gospel?”) by showing that, for Origen, the term “Gospel,” strictly speaking, does not designate just any discourse bearing the early Christian proclamation, but rather one that does so under the form of narratives of the life of Jesus. The stage is thus set for the more pivotal – and tortuous – question: What kind of narratives are they?
This article considers recent Shakespearian productions emphasizing sound, including Max Webster’s acclaimed, yet controversial, London production of Macbeth with David Tennant and Cush Jumbo, and Knock at the Gate’s entirely auditory Shakespearian presentations, created for listening in the dark with headphones. Binaural technology creates striking soundscapes in each instance.
Sir John Gielgud was a highly regarded Shakespearian performer on stage and screen. However, his prolific career playing Shakespeare on radio is far less celebrated. This article shows that he not only was one of the most important early radio actors, but continued to be influential throughout his life.
This article focuses on a transmedial project that has become an important strand in a growing adaptational network in which Hamlet is being reactivated to explore the current situation in Ukraine. Exploring the adaptational principles of ruination and reconstruction, it discusses the fragility and promises of local, national and transnational community-building through Shakespeare.
This chapter explores the sacral aspects of Achaemenid Persian kingship. It attempts to precisely illuminate the ruler’s relationship with the divine and to demonstrate that the assumption of priestly prerogatives was an important aspect of his office. To better appreciate the political function of religion, this study provides cultural and historical contexts for the royal appropriation of sacral attributes. It further contributes to the recent field of study regarding a possible soteriological dimension to Achaemenid ideology by assessing and synthesising new and previously cited evidence for the existence of such an element, as well as its possible applications.
We show that the category of comonoids, defined with respect to the composition product in the category of polynomial functors, is equivalent to a category of small categories as objects but with an interesting type of morphism called retrofunctors. Unlike traditional functors, retrofunctors operate in a forward-backward manner, offering a different kind of relationship between categories. We introduce this concept of retrofunctors, provide examples to illustrate their behavior, and explain their role in modeling state systems.
This chapter explains why inframarginal analysis should be used to evaluate whether to enforce consumer boilerplate provisions, and then applies this approach to show that the use of pro-consumer boilerplate terms should be mandatory. Inframarginal analysis looks at how the law can allocate inframarginal resources in ways that are fairer and more efficient than unregulated outcomes. Two policy considerations are paramount when carrying out this analysis: 1) devising ways to distribute resources equitably, and 2) minimizing wasteful competition. The impact of consumer boilerplate is largely inframarginal, so inframarginal analysis is the correct way to evaluate whether to enforce these provisions. In carrying out this analysis, a graph-based approach is helpful in showing why equitable considerations point toward preferring pro-consumer terms over pro-seller terms and why wasteful competition considerations point toward making the use of these pro-consumer terms mandatory. The usefulness of this analysis is further demonstrated by applying the findings here to the more specific question of whether to enforce choice-of-forum provisions in consumer contracts.
The communities of the western Niger Delta, in the midst of economic turmoil, confronted the British colonial government’s effort to integrate them into the wider colonial economy with a boycott on palm oil exports in 1927. Taxation was the primary instrument of incorporation for the British government, and Niger Delta community’s primary form of leverage against taxation was a systemic boycott. Beyond taxation, these communities resented the imposition of warrant chiefs, who were tasked with enforcing taxation and carrying out local administration of the courts (another vital source of income for the colonial government). The 1927 boycott succeeded in slowing down the palm oil trade. It was also part of a broader pattern of resistance in the palm-producing region across southern Nigeria. This widespread resistance indicated the lack of knowledge and control the colonial state had regarding these communities, and the need to impose stronger mechanisms of contol, through the warrant chiefs, increased surveilance and policing, and by exploiting ethnic differences.
This chapter places the Dead Sea Scrolls into dialogue with social-scientific scholarship on violence in New Religious Movements. It introduces the sociological model of a multipart process of escalating tension (latent tension, nascent conflict, intensified conflict) based on a complex set of internal and external factors that potentially ends in what he refers to as violent dramatic denouements. Chapter 2 focuses on the first stage of the process, which provides a framework in which to situate the nonviolent origins of the Dead Sea Scrolls Sectarians and explains how a movement born in social tension develops into a movement steeped in violence. This chapter argues that Miqṣat Ma‘ase HaTorah is reflective of a protest movement in its earlier stages.
Edited by
Martin Nedbal, University of Kansas,Kelly St. Pierre, Wichita State University and Institute for Theoretical Studies, Prague,,Hana Vlhová-Wörner, University of Basel and Masaryk Institute, Prague
Brief remarks suggest different reading strategies to different readers, both specialist and nonspecialist. Those less familiar with modern Iranian history and politics are invited to begin with Chapter 1, the “Introduction.” More knowledgeable readers may prefer to skim over parts of Chapter 1 in order to begin with Chapter 2, “Tied Up in Tehran.” Thanks to the community of support who have contributed to this project.