To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A partially-auxetic metamaterial is introduced, inspired by the Maltese cross. Each unit of this metamaterial consists of a pair of counter-rotating equal-armed crosses, which is interconnected to neighboring units via hinge rods and connecting rods. Based on linkage theory, the on-axes Poisson's ratio was established considering a two-fold symmetrical mechanism, while the (anti)tetrachiral mechanisms were identified for on-axes uniaxial compression. A shearing mechanism is suggested for pure shearing and diagonal loading of the metamaterial with square array. Results suggest that the approximated infinitesimal models are valid for the Poisson's ratio of the two-fold symmetrical and the (anti)tetrachiral mechanisms under on-axis tension and compression, respectively; however, the finite model is recommended for quantifying the Poisson's ratio under pure shear and off-axis loading. This metamaterial manifests microstructural trinity, in which three different loading modes result in three different groups of deformation mechanisms. Finally, suggestions are put forth for some unsolved predictive problems.
This chapter describes specialised equipment and techniques used to perform LEED experiments and to measure intensities of diffracted LEED beams. An overview of the most common setups for experiments will be given. The diffraction geometry is important for the comparison of experimental LEED data with theory and will, thus, be covered in some detail. For the measurement of LEED intensities, close attention will be paid in particular to the preparation of the sample, the accurate alignment of the sample and the physical properties of the detectors, such as the frequently used video cameras. The instrumental response function is one aspect of detectors that can affect the measured intensities, most notably spot profiles used to measure lateral dimensions such as island sizes and disorder. Among various LEED systems that are available on the market, two types will be addressed in relatively more detail, as they provide higher resolution (i.e., are able to detect structural correlations over larger distances along the surface): spot profile analysis LEED (SPA-LEED) and low-energy electron microscope (LEEM). Finally, instrumentation will be described that has been developed for more targeted applications, such as electron-beam sensitive surfaces, and surfaces with micro- or nanoscale structures.
X-ray diffraction is the main tool used to obtain the atomic structure of 3-D crystals. The relatively weak interaction of the X-ray beam with matter and the resulting large penetration depth makes it insensitive to structural details in a small surface area: the surface is therefore usually neglected in structure determinations of 3-D crystals. This has changed with the development of synchrotron radiation as an X-ray source which provided new applications in X-ray crystallography. The very high intensity and angular resolution of the synchrotron beam allow the study of numerous effects which had been considered too weak to detect with laboratory X-ray sources. It has been shown, however, that with intensive X-ray sources that are available now, the structure analysis at surfaces is also possible in the laboratory.
The description of crystal surfaces requires some basic knowledge of crystallography. Therefore, this chapter presents a short overview of crystal lattices and their classification due to symmetry. This knowledge is required to understand the substrate structure and the orientation of the surface. However, the 3-D point groups, space groups and the mathematical description of symmetry operations in three dimensions are not described here: for a more detailed explanation the reader is referred to the International Tables of Crystallography [2.1], which is the standard reference book, or a number of textbooks on crystallography published by the International Union of Crystallography [2.2–2.5]. The 2-D space groups and symmetry operations are explained with somewhat more detail here because these are frequently used in surface structure determination. A very detailed description of the geometry of crystal surfaces is given in a recent book by K. Hermann [2.6]. A short introduction into the kinematic theory of diffraction and into diffraction at 2-D periodic lattices is also included here.
We discuss here the methods of quantitative LEED I(V) analysis and their application to relatively complex types of surface structures: quasicrystalline and modulated surfaces.
This study assessed neonatal visual maturity in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) and its predictive value for neurodevelopmental outcomes. Neonates with CHD underwent a standardized visual assessment before and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Visual maturity was rated as normal versus abnormal by means of normative reference data. Twelve-month neurodevelopment was assessed with the Bayley-III. Twenty-five healthy controls served as the reference group. Neonatal visual assessment was performed in five neonates with CHD preoperatively and in 24 postoperatively. Only postoperative assessments were considered for further analysis. Median [IQR] age at assessment was 27.0 [21.5, 42.0] days of life in postoperative neonates with CHD and 24.0 [15.0, 32.0] in controls. Visual performance was within reference values in 87.5% in postoperative CHD versus 90.5% in healthy controls (p = 1.0). Visual maturity was not predictive of neurodevelopment at 12 months. These results demonstrate the limited feasibility and predictive value of neonatal visual assessments in CHD.