To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although the sixteenth century is more popularly known in the accounts of Russian history as a time of internal crises largely perpetrated by a bloody autocracy and boyar intrigues, those violent events were no more significant than developments in the social and cultural reconstruction of life among the peoples of Orthodox Rus' during the same period. Prominent among these developments was the gradual formation of small centers of learning, largely outside the confines of the Moscow Tsardom but yet within the larger community of Eastern Orthodox Slavdom. Both within and between the nationality areas, communication and the pursuit of learning not only continued to function while they existed under different state administrations, but even began to intensify and to expand, especially during the latter half of the sixteenth century and into the seventeenth. This intensification of cultural life had its sources and foundations in the geographic, political, economic, social and intellectual realities in the lands of Orthodox Rus’. It both reflected and helped shape the growing crisis faced by leaders of the Orthodox clergies of Rus'.
Michael John Demiashkevich's professional career in the United States encompassed fewer than ten years. Within this brief period, however, he probably contributed more of lasting significance to American educational theory and practice than most philosophers of education contribute in a lifetime. It was during these years that he, along with a few other educators, laid the foundations of a new philosophy of education-a philosophy that was labeled “Essentialism,” a word Demiashkevich coined in 1935 to refer to his educational point of view.
In 1938 Michael Demiashkevich, professor of education at the George Peabody College for Teachers, and F. Alden Shaw, principal of the Detroit Country Day School, founded the Essentialist Movement at the annual meeting of the American Association of School Administrators. At that Atlantic City meeting, William Chandler Bagley delivered an address—“An Essentialist's Platform for the Advancement of American Education.” Like any tag, the essentialist tag that has been pinned on Bagley obscures as much as it designates. It has drawn attention away from the greater part of his career as an educationist, obscuring many of the problems he encountered and attempted to resolve.