Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Browse subjects
  3. Classical Studies
  4. Ancient philosophy
  5. Content listing

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

11344 results in Ancient philosophy

Page 511 of 568

  • APPENDIX (A) ON A 11 § 17

  • Edited by Edward Meredith Cope, John Edwin Sandys
  • Book:
    Aristotle: Rhetoric
    Published online:
    05 October 2010
    Print publication:
    01 April 2010, pp 292-296
    First published in:
    1877

  • Summary

    στοργή, ἔρως, ϕιλεῖν, ἀγαπᾶν

    [The following Appendix has already appeared as an article in the Journal of Philology, Vol. 1 No. 1 (1868), pp. 88—93. s.]

    There are four terms in Greek which represent different states or degrees of affection, fondness, liking, love, in its most general acceptation. Of these στοργή and ἔρως are co-ordinate terms, in this respect, that they both designate what Aristotle calls πάθη, instinctive affections, implanted in sentient beings by nature.

  • TEXT AND COMMENTARY, BOOK II

  • Edited by Edward Meredith Cope, John Edwin Sandys
  • Book:
    Aristotle: Rhetoric
    Published online:
    07 September 2010
    Print publication:
    01 April 2010, pp 1-335
    First published in:
    1877

  • Summary

    Έκ τίνων μὲν οὖν δεἶ καὶ προτρέπειν καὶ ἀποτρέπειν καὶ ἐπαινεῖν καὶ ψέγειν καὶ κκατηγορεῖν καὶ ἀπολογεῖσθαι, καὶ ποῖαι δόξαι καὶ προτάσεις χρήσιμοι

    CHAP. I.

    In the following chapter we have a very brief account of the second kind of rhetorical proof, viz. the ethical, the ἦθος ἐν τῷ λέγοντι. The treatment of it is cursory ; and we are referred backwards to the analysis of virtue moral and intellectual in Book I c. 91, for further details of the topics from which are to be derived the enthymemes whereby the speech and the speaker may be made to assume the required character of Φρόνηησις, ἀρετή and εὔνοια; and forwards to the chapter on ϕιλία and μῖσος (11 4), in the treatise on the πάθη, where the indications of these affections are enumerated, which will enable the speaker to convey (always by his. speech) the good intentions and friendly feeling by which he is affected towards his audience. As supplementary and auxiliary to the direct logical arguments this indirect ethical mode of persuasion is indispensable to the success of the speech. People are hardly likely to be convinced by a speaker who sets them against him.

  • APPENDIX (E): SHILLETO'S Adversaria ON ARISTOTLE'S RHETORIC

  • Edited by Edward Meredith Cope, John Edwin Sandys
  • Book:
    Aristotle: Rhetoric
    Published online:
    05 October 2010
    Print publication:
    01 April 2010, pp 222-227
    First published in:
    1877

  • Summary

    [Among the books belonging to the late Mr Shilleto which have been recently acquired by the University Library, are two interleaved copies of the edition of the Rhetoric printed at the Oxford University Press in 1826. One of these, which is in bad condition owing to many years of use, contains a large number of annotations of very unequal value, written in various hands; in the other, which bears on the title-page the name Richard Shilleto with the date Dec. 15, 1863, apparently all the notes on which his maturer judgment set any value, are copied out by himself in a hand rivalling that of Richard Porson for clearness and beauty. All these notes, and a few selections from the older book, with some trifling omissions, (parallel passages, for instance, already quoted at large in these volumes,) I have transcribed in full by permission of the Syndics of the University Library, and I append them here as an epilogue to Mr Cope's Commentary.]

Page 511 of 568