We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 7 asks how it took more than five years for one of the most pressing legislative projects, seen as essential to enable law enforcement authorities all over the EU to effectively investigate crimes, to be resolved. The European Commission put forward the legislative package concerning e-evidence in criminal matters in 2018, but the legislative process was not concluded until June 2023. What can explain the divergences and delays that occurred, despite all parties having acknowledged the importance of the project? This chapter provides an overview of the difficulties that marked the negotiation process, as well as the solutions finally found, and serves as a very useful guide to e-evidence. It outlines the pre-history of e-evidence and the different stages of the negotiating process, before laying out the positions of the various actors on several issues that had to be negotiated. Finally, it focuses on the most contentious issue, namely the notification to be given, in some cases, by the issuing state to other states involved, permitting them to review the requests to service providers in order to ensure that human rights are protected and that no abuse occurs.
In order to situate the women who worked in royal and aristocratic households in their proper context, the first chapter explores household composition, demonstrating similarities of servant arrangements at all levels of elite society even though household size varied at different status gradations. Over time, households of every status level grew, offering further career opportunities, especially since elite households became more welcoming to women in the late fourteenth century, even though throughout the Middle Ages they remained almost exclusively male domains. This chapter argues that female servants gained their positions through kinship and patronage opportunities that favored their placement and promotion. In investigating the qualities that employers desired in their servants, I contend that they chose attendants who demonstrated useful skills, good character, and pleasing appearance. This chapter reveals that turnover occurred due to death, retirement, marriage (which did not necessitate retirement), dismissal, or transition to different households, and seems to have been a frequent aspect of life for a lady-in-waiting, yet I also assert that a minority of attendants served their ladies for long durations, at least a decade or more.
Trifludimoxazin is a PPO-inhibiting herbicide currently under development for preplant burndown and soil residual weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and other crops. Greenhouse dose response experiments with foliar applications of trifludimoxazin, fomesafen, and saflufenacil were conducted on susceptible and PPO-inhibitor resistant (PPO-R) waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer] and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) biotypes. These PPO-R biotypes contained the PPO2 target site (TS) mutations ΔG210 (A. tuberculatus and A. palmeri), R128G (A. tuberculatus), and V361A (A. palmeri). The R/S ratios for fomesafen and saflufenacil ranged from 2.0 to 9.2 across all PPO-R biotypes. In contrast, the response of known PPO inhibitor-susceptible and -resistant biotypes to trifludimoxazin did not differ within each Amaranthus species. In 2017 and 2018 experiments at the Meigs and Davis Purdue Agriculture Centers were conducted in fields with native A. tuberculatus populations comprised of 3% and 30% PPO-R plants (ΔG210 mutation), respectively. At Meigs in 2018, A. tuberculatus control following foliar applications of fomesafen, lactofen, saflufenacil, and trifludimoxazin was greater than 95%. When averaged across the other three site-years, applications of 25 g ai ha-1 trifludimoxazin resulted in 95% control of A. tuberculatus 28 DAA, while applications of fomesafen (343 g ai ha-1), lactofen (219 g ai ha-1), or saflufenacil (25.0 or 50 g ai ha-1), resulted in 80 to 88% control. Thus, at these relative application rates, the foliar efficacy of trifludimoxazin was comparable or greater on A. tuberculatus, when compared to other commercial PPO inhibitors, even in populations where low frequencies of PPO inhibitor-resistant plants exist. The lack of cross resistance for common PPO2 TS mutations to trifludimoxazin, and the level of foliar field efficacy observed on populations containing PPO-R individuals suggests that trifludimoxazin may be a valuable herbicide in an integrated approach for managing herbicide-resistant Amaranthus weeds.
This paper proposes an options pricing model that incorporates stochastic volatility, stochastic interest rates, and stochastic jump intensity. Market shocks are modeled using a jump process, with each jump governed by an asymmetric double-exponential distribution. The model also integrates a Markov regime-switching framework for volatility and the risk-free rate, allowing the market to alternate between a finite number of distinct economic states. A closed-form solution for European option pricing is derived. To demonstrate the significance of the proposed model, a comparison with various other models is performed, and the sensitivity of the various model parameters is illustrated.
Teaching a language lesson, even for experienced teachers, involves a degree of forethought, and this is typically realized in the form of a lesson plan, even if it is nothing more than a few notes on the back of an envelope.
11 Why plan?
12 Planning v spontaneity
13 Design thinking
14 Lesson shapes
15 The lesson plan format
16 The context (1): The learners
17 The context (2): Beyond the classroom
18 Aims, objectives, goals and outcomes
19 Formulating lesson aims
20 Backward design
21 Researching and analyzing language
22 Anticipating problems
23 Routines and rituals
24 Activity types
25 Staging and sequencing
26 Using coursebooks
27 Using authentic materials
28 Integrating technology
29 Using online resources
30 Using artificial intelligence (AI)
31 Collaborative planning
Why plan?
What is the point of planning if we cannot fully predict what will happen in a lesson? And isn't it a fact that expert teachers plan less, if at all?
Why plan lessons? The question may seem redundant. We plan for the same reasons that we plan so many other social events such as meals, vacations, parties, or business meetings: however many times we might have experienced them, we can never be sure they won't spin out of control. Lessons are like that. According to Doyle (1986), classroom teaching takes place in conditions of multidimensionality (i.e., there are a number of events and processes going on); simultaneity (i.e., they are happening at the same time); immediacy (i.e., they happen quickly); and unpredictability (i.e., we can never be sure what is going to happen next). Given this complexity, it makes sense to have strategies to deal with it, one of which is planning ahead. Planning doesn't necessarily preempt the need to think on our feet, but it provides a degree of structure with which to mitigate potential chaos. Like a route map to a hiker or a compass to a sailor, it helps orient our journey.
And every lesson is different: we can't keep repeating the same lesson day after day, week after week. Even if the format is essentially the same, the content must vary – whether it is derived from a syllabus, a coursebook, or the expressed needs of the learners (or a combination of all three).
This chapter turns its attention to the first years of the Great War. Commencing with a reading of James’s wartime correspondence, its first half charts how the aging author was tormented, in the latter stages of 1914, by the possibility that his life and works might be subjected to retroactive disavowal in light of the conflict he never saw coming. It then discusses two of James’s wartime works, The Middle Years (1917) and The Sense of the Past (1917), focusing on how these texts engage with and reflect upon the prospect of undoing and recasting formative experiences. In its second half, the chapter zooms out slightly and offers a broader investigation of the wartime critical climate within which James’s acts of creative self-interrogation took place. Noting that as the conflict raged on, authors and critics alike became caught up in debates about the purpose of reading in wartime, the chapter draws on Rebecca West’s reviews of James from 1915 and 1916 and analyses her Jamesian novel, The Return of the Solider (1918), to explore the psychological and ethical pressures that were placed on another form of counterfactual consolation: the world into which we can escape through fiction.
Chapter 7 reports on an SDR-based RFID reader design including hardware and software implementations and demonstrates ISO 18000-63-compliant operation in conventional continuous-wave mode and in a novel multicarrier mode.