To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In the late eighteenth century, the British East India Company discovered that opium grown in colonial India sold well in China, where it was, however, illegal. Mounting tensions caused by the illegal trade led to an Opium War in 1840–1842, won by Britain and leading to the establishment of a “semi-colonial” treaty port system in China. Mid nineteenth-century China was also wracked by multiple rebellions, including the massive Christian Taiping Rebellion. Yet the Qing Dynasty not only survived but also experienced some revitalization. Meanwhile, in 1854 a U.S. Navy squadron pressured Japan to end its seclusion policy, and a similar treaty port system was established in Japan as well. In 1867 the last Shogun resigned, and in 1868 power was returned to the Japanese imperial government in the Meiji Restoration. Meiji Japan embraced rapid Westernization in the name of an allegedly primordial imperial line. Japan then pressured Korea into granting it treaty port privileges, and, after defeating China in a war fought over Korea, Japan eventually reduced Korea to an outright colony. Starting with the seizure of Saigon in 1859, Vietnam was colonized by France.
Chapter 3 encourages students to struggle with how some people have been geographically separated from Whites or divided within communities based on skin color, language, or cultural markers. This chapter explores how housing and education opportunities continue to be distinct today for different racialized populations, and the legal actions that have resulted from people living in segregated communities in the United States. Building on some of the most recent research on the relationships between law and segregation, the cases and excerpts in this chapter explore the role of law in forcing people to live in isolated neighborhoods, resulting in the depression of income for some and limiting the accumulation of wealth over generations based on race. Readers are asked to consider the ways in which local, state, and federal governments are responsible for ongoing inequities in the United States based on race, and the implications of such accountability.
Far from being “the end of history,” the post-Cold War era has seen dramatic new developments in East Asia. China rose with astonishing speed to superpower status, and reasserted Communist Party control after a period when it seemed in danger of becoming irrelevant to China’s new consumer society. China is now openly challenging the United States and western Europe for global leadership. China has also, surprisingly, witnessed some revival of old traditions such as Confucianism. South Korea has captivated the world with its attractive modern pop culture, as well as with the products of its industry such as smartphones and automobiles. South Korea has also ended authoritarian rule and become a democracy (while North Korea, on the other hand, still seems to be mired in the Cold War). Japan has remained economically stagnant after the bursting of its stock market and real estate bubbles in 1990, but Japan has also made itself a globalizing center of exciting new pop culture. Vietnam, meanwhile, consolidated its socialist reunification, and implemented some of the same kinds of market-based economic reforms that had been pioneered in China.
The Cold War divided East Asia. Beginning around 1978, the communist People’s Republic of China implemented market-based reforms that unleashed spectacular economic takeoff, but which were not accompanied by corresponding political reforms. After a bloody war, Korea has remained divided between an impoverished and isolationistic communist regime in the north and the non-communist south. Japan’s postwar “developmental state” economy boomed, and by 1981 Japan had become the world’s largest automaker. Trade wars with the U.S. led to a sharp increase in the exchange value of the yen, however, and the bursting of the Japanese bubble economy in 1990. In Vietnam, after the defeat and withdrawal of French colonial forces, massive American military intervention in support of the non-communist south became deeply controversial. Eventually the U.S. disengaged, and Vietnam was reunified by communist northern forces in 1975. The Cold War therefore ended, somewhat surprisingly, with communist regimes still entrenched in East Asia in mainland China, Vietnam, and North Korea.
This chapter relates the legendary origins of the modern East Asian nations, and the importance of those legends to modern national identities. It then reconstructs the somewhat different story of the origins of Bronze Age civilization in East Asia based on the archeological evidence, starting in the Central Plain of what is today north China. As a fundamental feature, the languages of East Asia are discussed. This chapter argues that it was widespread shared regional use of the largely non-phonetic Chinese written characters, despite great linguistic diversity, that gave East Asia much of its cultural coherence and distinctiveness, as well as much shared vocabulary.
Chapter 1 encourages students to investigate the Constitution’s role in upholding slavery, and how political values informed those decisions. This chapter highlights the differences between global and contemporary slavery versus the race-based chattel slavery seen in the U.S. and in the Americas/Carribbean, exploring how a nation founded on competing legal claims of equality and liberty denied personhood under the law to so many. It also examines how free African Americans, and some Whites, challenged these conflicting notions, and in what ways the law – in upholding property as a key liberty – also created and maintained slavery and racial distinctions. Slavery in the U.S. has not been a static concept; the law embedded slavery, institutionalizing it as a political structure that continued to evolve after formal emancipation. Finally, competing interpretations of the Constitution continue to impact how the nation evaluates its capacity to engage with robust and equitable definitions of liberty and equality. Students are asked to consider what might be the best interpretation of the Constitution’s engagement with slavery and why such competing definitions matter.
Much of the foreign investment that has fueled China’s post-reform economic boom has come from overseas Chinese people, with Hong Kong serving as China’s largest single source of foreign direct investment. In addition, there is extensive sharing of popular culture throughout the Chinese-speaking world. Hong Kong, a British colony since 1842, was returned to Chinese rule in 1997 under the formula “one country, two systems” – supposedly allowing Hong Kong a continued degree of autonomy. But a controversial extradition agreement in 2019 sparked mass protests, which Beijing reacted to in 2020 by imposing a new National Security Law that brought Hong Kong more firmly under control. Taiwan, meanwhile, became the last refuge for the Chinese Nationalist Party after it lost the Civil War to the Communists in 1949. In the 1980s–1990s, opposition political parties were legalized, and Taiwan evolved into a genuine multiparty democracy. Because Beijing insists that Taiwan is a renegade province that must be recovered eventually, and because Taiwan is a flourishing democracy that now produces more than 60 percent of all the world’s computer chips, Taiwan is a place of great global strategic concern.
Chapter 7 queries how the law addresses evolving concepts such as intentionality, intersectionality, and multiracial identities. In a common law system, legal precedents are static even though public understanding of race in society has expanded dramatically. This chapter explores the historic requirement to demonstrate evidence of an intent to discriminate to justify intervention by the law, which emerged from a traditional understanding of racism as personal and purposeful. Despite the potential harm of neutral policies creating disparate damages in racialized communities, this barrier to governmental action and its concomitant justification for neglect, matters. Students will explore the inability of the law to address multiple racial identities simultaneously and the legal consequences of ignoring intersectionality. The text considers a proposed constitutional amendment to address this limitation. Finally, the law’s hesitance to address multiracial identities is explored, questioning whether current legal structure is adequate to address contemporary understandings of racism and racial discrimination.
Chapter 4 examines the consequences when the state does not protect the security of people within its realm because of their race, and how this negligence intersects with the contemporary criminal justice system. The chapter focuses on current arguments surrounding Black Lives Matter and similar movements in Latino and Native communities regarding state violence against communities of color. The primary sources examine several criminal justice protections provided under the Constitution, consider the Fourteenth Amendment’s requirements of state and federal governments, and question how the government protects the people against itself and from White majorities. Readers may engage with the continuing debates around the responsibility of governments to ensure that policing is not racialized and consider the most just specific policies or legal interpretations focusing on the accountability of state actors. The chapter conncludes by exploring the potential of the constitutional requirement of a jury of peers for criminal prosecution may hinder the exercise of state-sanctioned racialized violence.
An East Asian community of states based on shared cultural and institutional models matured in the seventh–tenth centuries. Beginning in the mid seventh century, Japan completely transformed itself according to Chinese-style codes of penal and administrative law. A unified and independent Korea, after 676, maintained a careful balance between native traditions and prestigious Chinese models. In China itself, the great Tang dynasty consolidated a more homogeneously Chinese culture and identity. Even South Asian Buddhism was domesticated. But the tenth century then brought changes of dynasty to both China and Korea, independence for what becomes Vietnam, and gradually emerging new directions in Japan, including weakening of the imperial government, the emergence of samurai warriors, and the flourishing of Japanese language literature.
Chapter 6 investigates the legal options to ameliorate historic approaches to race, allowing the United States to more closely align with its national ideals. Over time, different branches of government developed strategies to ameliorate the damage caused by institutionalized racism. However, courts have wrestled with the question of how these remedies might reify race – making it more central to American life – or destroy the unique aspects of communities, forged by their shared experiences fo race, in an effort to provide greater equality. The chapter asks if the law and Constitution require public institutions to be color-blind in their treatment of race, or does the racial history of the nation demand color-conscious remedies. The text traces the evolution of affirmative action, especially in education, as a means of compensating for generational exclusion and the Supreme Court’s changing perception on color blindness as a constitutional principle.. The treatment of those U.S. territories that have not been granted statehood, where the majority of the population are people of color is explored. Finally, recent expansions to Native sovereignty are examined and the reader is asked to consider the impact of such protections on Native equality.