Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Browse subjects
  3. Physics and Astronomy
  4. Planetary systems and astrobiology
  5. Content listing

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

3045 results in Planetary systems and astrobiology

Page 99 of 153

  • 8 - The roots of metabolism

  • from PART III - The origin of life on Earth
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 174-186

  • Summary

    Introduction to cellular metabolism

    While it may be impossible to derive a satisfactory definition of life in a global or astrobiological context, we can circumvent such metaphysical questions if we define life not by what it is, but rather by what it does. Every function of life requires metabolism, the coupled chemical processes that generate and exploit biochemical energy. This chapter discusses what can be deduced from examination of extant organisms about the origin and early history of life. First, however, in this section we lay out the basic principles of cellular metabolism.

    It is constructive to divide metabolism into functional categories and then consider the various biochemical details. The primary distinction between metabolic functions is whether they generate biologically useful energy or, instead, use this energy. Processes that use energy from the environment for the production of biological energy are referred to as catabolic metabolic processes. Anabolic metabolic processes, on the other hand, use stored biological energy to do biosynthesis, i.e., to synthesize the required building blocks for cellular structure. In any organism, the coordination (or regulation) of anabolic and catabolic processes is the essence of cellular metabolism (Fig. 8.1). At the core of metabolism lies the flow of carbon within an organism – its chemical pathways govern all essential cellular function and are the basis of what is called intermediary metabolism.

    For biological energy conversion and structural biosynthesis, it is fundamental that life exploits chemical gradients and thermodynamic potentials that naturally exist in the external environment.

  • 16 - The evolution and diversification of life

  • from PART IV - Life on Earth
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 313-334

  • Summary

    Introduction

    The fossil record conjures up images of dinosaurs, trilobites, and extinct humans. This reflects not only our anthropocentric (or better, metazoan-centric) bias, but also a visual bias. Starting about 542 Ma, macroscopic remains of animals, traces, shells, and later bones and plants, become quite evident in the fossil record, hence the geological term Phanerozoic, which literally means the eon of “visible life.” These 542 Myr of the fossil record demonstrate that changes have occurred in organisms and have provided compelling evidence for the theory of evolution. This chapter addresses the history of life in the two youngest eons of geological time, the Proterozoic and the Phanerozoic, which span the last 2500 Myr. It is a record of contrasts. Whereas the Proterozoic was mainly a microbial world, the Phanerozoic is a world of macroscopic animals and plants. The transition from the Proterozoic to the Phanerozoic marks what may be one of the most significant evolutionary events in the history of life, when many of the modern animal phyla evolved. Highlights of this 2500 Myr record include the rise to dominance of cyanobacteria in shallow marine environments, the early evolution and diversification of eukaryotes, the first appearance of multicellular algae, the appearance of animals and their subsequent rapid diversification (the Cambrian explosion), the first land plants and their subsequent diversification, and the appearance and dominance of intelligent life (humans).

  • 2 - From exobiology to astrobiology

  • from PART I - History
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 46-66

  • Summary

    The rise of exobiology, the study of the origin of life and of possible life outside the Earth, was intimately related to the birth of the Space Age, and particularly to the birth of the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in 1958. By providing the means to enter space, NASA placed exobiology into the arena where an age-old problem could be empirically tested with in situ observations and experiments. Moreover, in pursuit of exobiology, on the ground NASA funded experiments on the origin of life, revived planetary science, sponsored theoretical and observational studies on planetary systems, and assembled the flagship program in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) – all conceptual elements of the budding discipline. Over four decades, at a relatively small but steady level of funding punctuated by the landmark Viking mission to Mars, the American space agency put into place the conceptual, institutional, and community structures necessary for a new discipline, leaving no doubt of NASA's status as the primary patron of exobiology. The interest in the search for life, however, knew no national boundaries. Especially in the post-Viking era, international involvement grew in the field that also became known as “bioastronomy,” and that was transformed at the end of the century into a broadened “astrobiology” effort.

    The ability to search for life beyond Earth did not guarantee its adoption as a program within NASA or any other space agency.

  • 28 - Disciplinary aspirations and educational opportunities

  • from PART VII - Future of astrobiology
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 547-557

  • Summary

    Astrobiology: a new discipline?

    The controversial assertion in 1996 that the martian meteorite ALH84001 contained evidence for ancient microbial life stoked public, political, and scientific interest in astrobiology. Two years later, the NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI) was launched, its mission to “study the origin, evolution, distribution, and future of life on Earth and in the Universe.” This mission, though ambitious, is not really new. Indeed, according to this definition, astrobiology has been studied for decades if not centuries (Chapter 1). Astrobiological research would include James Watson and Francis Crick's decipherment half a century ago of the double helix and with it (according to Crick) the “secret of life.” It also would include Stanley Miller and Harold Urey's in vitro synthesis of amino acids by electric discharge, the Viking Mission of 1976 to search for life on Mars, the discovery of hydrothermal vents, and the recognition that a wayward impactor probably drove the dinosaurs extinct. Yet none of this research was carried out under the auspices of astrobiology or required a specific astrobiological framework. Recently, however, during the so-called “Astrobiology Revolution” of the 1990s (Section 2.3; Ward and Brownlee, 2000), increasing attention has been devoted to developing precisely such a framework, as implied by the formation of NAI. Programs oriented to astrobiology research or training have acquired various degrees of formalization throughout the world. Astrobiology journals have been created. You are reading a textbook devoted to astrobiology. These milestones both represent and fuel ambitions to transform astrobiology into a new discipline.

  • 18 - Mars

  • from PART V - Potentially habitable worlds
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 357-387

  • Summary

    Mars and astrobiology

    Mars is at the center of the field of astrobiology in many ways. Today's vigorous program of ongoing exploration is largely motivated by Mars's potential to harbor life at present or at some time in the past. But astrobiology as a discipline is about more than just finding out whether there is or ever was life on Mars or on other planets and satellites. It is about determining the governing principles behind whether life will originate on a given planet or whether it can survive if transplanted there; about what the mechanisms are by which planets and biota can and do interact with each other; and about determining which fundamental factors distinguish a planet that is habitable from one that is not.

    We know that the Earth meets the environmental requirements for being habitable. In Mars, we have an example of a planet that evolved under different physical and chemical conditions, allowing us to see what effects these differences can have. Today, Earth has global-scale plate tectonics, and Mars does not. Earth has global oceans at its surface, and Mars does not. Earth has a climate conducive to the coexistence of the solid, liquid, and vapor phases of water, each of which affects the geology and geochemistry of the planet, and Mars does not. In finding out whether Mars has or ever had life, we obtain a second example of whether and how life can occur on a planetary body.

  • 27 - Alien biochemistries

  • from PART VI - Searching for extraterrestrial life
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 537-544

  • Summary

    Introduction

    Common among the many definitions of life (Chapter 5) is mention of sets of chemical reactions that allow metabolism, replication, and evolution. The specifics of those reactions are generally not part of these definitions, although a century of study of the metabolisms that support life on Earth has given us a rich repertoire of illustrative biochemical examples. Unfortunately, because all known life on Earth is descended from a single common ancestor, our study of terran biochemistry, no matter how extensive, cannot provide a comprehensive view of the full range of possible reactions that might generally support life.

    This leaves open an important question. If life exists elsewhere in the Cosmos, will its chemistry be similar to the chemistry of life on Earth? Recent articles addressing this issue are by Irwin and Schulze-Makuch (2001), Crawford (2001), Bains (2004), and Benner et al. (2004), and several popular books are listed under “Further reading” at chapter's end. As in many areas in contemporary astrobiology, no clear methodology exists to address the question of “weird life.” Chemistry, however, including the skills outlined in Chapter 7, provides one set of tools for constructing hypotheses about possible alternative biological chemistries.

    The emerging field of synthetic biology (Benner and Sismour, 2005) provides another set of tools. Here, chemists attempt to give substance to concepts about alternative life forms by synthesizing molecules that might support alternative genetic systems or alternative metabolisms.

  • Appendix C - The geological timescale

  • from PART VIII - Appendices
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 566-568

  • Summary

    The geological timescale is one of science's great triumphs. It represents “deep time” (McPhee, 1982), millions and billions of years ago, time beyond human comprehension. Geologists use two different ways to discuss geological time: (a) absolute time, and (b) relative time.

    Relative time was developed first, and is based on relative age relationships among rock units as determined by geometric relationships, fossils, and other distinctive attributes of the rock. Layered, sedimentary rocks (strata) are the most widely used, and during the nineteenth century allowed geologists to establish a relative geological timescale. The scale used strata with their contained fossils, and applied four fundamental principles of relative time: (1) original horizontality, (2) superposition, (3) original lateral continuity, and (4) fossil succession. Fossil succession refers to the particular vertical (stacked) order that fossils occur in strata. William Smith recognized this in 1799 and employed it to great effect in his geological map of England and Wales published in 1815. The other three principles were established much earlier by the Danish scholar Nicolaus Steno (1669). Original horizontality states that sediments are originally laid down in a horizontal or nearly horizontal manner. Superposition means that the oldest stratum is at the bottom and the youngest at the top. Original lateral continuity refers to the way strata extend laterally in all directions. The geometric relationship of bodies of rock to one another is also used; for example, an intrusion that cuts layered rock is younger than the layered rock it cuts.

  • Preface

  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp xix-xxii

  • Summary

    The emerging field of astrobiology encompasses a daunting variety of specialties, from astronomy to microbiology, from biochemistry to geology, from planetary sciences to phylogenetics. This is both exciting and frustrating – exciting because the potential astrobiologist is continually exposed to entirely new ways to look at the world, and frustrating because it is difficult to understand new results when venturing outside the confines of one's own specialty. There are now many excellent popular books on astrobiology, but a scientist wants more details and more sophistication than these afford. Where can an astronomer without any formal biology since high school learn the basics of cellular metabolism? Or the principles of evolution? Or notions about alternative forms of life? And where can a microbiologist with little physics and no astronomy learn the basics of how a planetary atmosphere works? Or how the Earth formed? Or how planets are detected around other stars? This book is designed to fill these needs.

    We have endeavored to cover all the important aspects of astrobiology at an advanced level, yet such that most of the contents in every chapter should be understandable to anyone versed in any relevant science discipline. We envision our youngest readers to be science majors near the end of undergraduate study or the beginning of graduate study. And at the other extreme, we aim to serve scientists who haven't taken an academic course for forty years, but are intrigued by the nascent field of astrobiology.

  • 10 - Evolution: a defining feature of life

  • from PART IV - Life on Earth
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 213-221

  • Summary

    In biology nothing makes sense except in the light of evolution. It is possible to describe living beings without asking questions about their origins. [But] the descriptions acquire meaning and coherence only when viewed in the perspective of evolutionary development.

    Theodosius Dobzhansky (1970: 6)

    From Lamarck to Darwin to the central dogma

    The basic notion of evolution is that inherited changes in populations of organisms result in expressed differences over time – these differences are at the gene level (the genotype) and/or expression of the gene into an identifiable characteristic (the phenotype). The important underlying fact of evolution is that all organisms share a common inheritance, or, put more dramatically, all extant organisms on Earth evolved from a common ancestor. We see this in the universal nature of the genetic code and in the unity of biochemistry: (a) all organisms share the same biochemical tools to translate the universal information code from genes to proteins, (b) all proteins are composed of the same twenty essential amino acids, and (c) all organisms derive energy for metabolic, catalytic, and biosynthetic processes from the same high-energy organic compounds such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP).

    In On the Origin of Species Charles Darwin (1859) (Fig. 10.1) built his theory of evolution using evidence that included an ancient Earth thought at the time by many geologists to have an age in millions of years. He also took the extinction of species to be a real phenomenon since fossils existed that were without living representatives.

  • Prologue

  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 1-6

  • Summary

    A new synthesis: the Biological Universe

    A remarkable shift in our scientific world picture is taking place, potentially as fundamental in its consequences as the new views put forth by Copernicus in the sixteenth century, or by Darwin in the nineteenth. Although astronomers have long been involved with the prospects for extraterrestrial life, their fundamental task since Newton has been to apply physics to a lifeless Universe. On the other hand, biologists have pursued their studies for centuries in cosmic isolation, meaning that biology considered life on Earth, with no attention paid to its cosmic context. Today, however, both camps are recognizing fruitful and exciting avenues of research created by a new synthesis. Biology is vastly enriched when attention is paid to a broader context for life as we know it, as well as the possibilities for other origins of life. And astronomy is coming to realize that the themes of cosmic, galactic, stellar, and planetary evolution, which have become central over the past century, must now also incorporate biological origin(s) and evolution(s). Historian of science Steven Dick (1996) has hailed this new synthesis as the Biological Universe. Although astronomy and biology are its two primary poles, many other disciplines are also vital components, in particular Earth and planetary sciences.

  • 15 - Life in ice

  • from PART IV - Life on Earth
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 292-312

  • Summary

    White men think of ice as frozen water, but Inuit think of water as melted ice. To us, ice is the natural state.

    Nuka Pinguaq, nineteenth-century native Arctic hunter (Kobalenko, 2002)

    Introduction

    Ice is the “natural state” or predominant form of water in our Solar System. The surfaces of most planets and moons are currently at temperatures well below the freezing point of pure water, including two of the more promising sites in the search for traces of extraterrestrial life, Mars and Europa. The amount of water-ice on Europa exceeds the volume of liquid water on Earth. Comets, considered potential vectors for precursors or early stages of life, are also icy bodies (Chapter 3). Even Earth may have undergone a series of complete (or near-complete) glaciations in its recent history, earning the title “Snowball Earth” (Section 4.2.4).

    The presence of the liquid phase of water, however, is essential to the prospering of life as we know it. In order to study where liquid water can occur, we must understand scales ranging from the structure of the water molecule to the temperatures possible on a planetary surface or subsurface. In our Solar System, only Earth allows for a planetary surface with abundant liquid water (Chapter 4). Mars, however, may well have some liquid water in permafrost (perennially frozen soil) beneath its surface today (Section 18.4.1), and the evidence is strong that Europa and perhaps other moons of Jupiter have water oceans below their icy crusts (Chapter 19).

  • 1 - History of astrobiological ideas

  • from PART I - History
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 9-45

  • Summary

    Overview

    Why history?

    The core questions of astrobiology are not new. They have always been asked and are central to Western intellectual history. How did life begin? How has it changed? What is the relation of humans to other species? Does life exist elsewhere? If so, where might it be and what is it like? Although these questions are ancient, what is new are the tools at hand to search for answers, ranging from robotic spacecraft to genome sequencing, from electron microscopes to radio telescopes. These tools and other factors (see the Prologue and Chapter 2) appear to have brought astrobiology to a point where it is gelling into something qualitatively different – our first sound attack on these questions. But is this so? Or is today no different from any other time in the past few centuries?

    In every era, including our own, scientists can do no more than tackle questions with the best tools available, apply the best insight they can muster, and struggle to fashion a consensus as to the nature of the world. In this manner our understanding has progressed, for example, from the “animalcules” that van Leeuwenhoek described three hundred years ago to the richness of contemporary microbiology. To understand such a thread as it meanders through history, we need to document more than the accumulation of facts. When evaluating a given episode, historians of science look carefully at evidence of not only the science itself, but also of the larger enveloping context.

  • 19 - Europa

  • from PART V - Potentially habitable worlds
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 388-423

  • Summary

    Introduction

    Europa, one of the four large satellites of Jupiter, is nearly the size of Earth's Moon. Tidal flexing driven by Jupiter's gravity and sustained by an orbital resonance with two other jovian satellites, Io and Ganymede, results in significant heat dissipation within Europa. Calculations indicate that this tidal heating is sufficient to maintain liquid water beneath Europa's ice crust. Moreover, observational evidence suggests that it is indeed probable, but not yet completely certain, that Europa harbors a subsurface ocean of liquid water whose volume is about twice that of Earth's oceans. The likely presence of abundant liquid water places Europa among the highest priority targets for astrobiology.

    To support life, Europa would also require an inventory of biogenic elements and a source of sufficient free energy. The ability to support life does not of course guarantee that the origin of life took place on Europa, or that life is present today; answering these questions will require further exploration. This chapter considers Europa in an astrobiological context, distinguishing among what is known, what is supported by evidence but still uncertain, and what remains more speculative. We conclude with a discussion of future missions that will be needed to address current geological and astrobiological questions.

    Jupiter and its satellites

    The planet Jupiter, orbiting the Sun at 5.2 AU, is more massive than the other planets in the Solar System combined; it is 3.3 times more massive than Saturn and 318 times more than the Earth.

  • 22 - How to search for life on other worlds

  • from PART VI - Searching for extraterrestrial life
  • Edited by Woodruff T. Sullivan, III, University of Washington, John Baross, University of Washington
  • Book:
    Planets and Life
    Published online:
    28 May 2018
    Print publication:
    13 September 2007, pp 461-472

  • Summary

    Introduction and summary

    In the original Star Trek series, Episode 26 (“The Devil in the Dark”), Mr. Spock uses a hand-held tricoder to remotely detect a silicon-based lifeform known as a “Horta.” Unfortunately, NASA engineers have not yet invented the tricoder to aid in our own search for life on Mars or Europa. In fact they are not even close to understanding the principle by which a tricoder is able to distinguish lifeforms, either carbon or silicon, from non-living matter. Even The Physics of Star Trek (Krauss, 1995) is notably silent on the operating physics behind the tricoder. How then do we achieve the Prime Mission of Astrobiology: to boldly go and seek out new lifeforms on distant worlds? The answer, not surprisingly, is that we base our search for life elsewhere on what we know about life on Earth. The basic elements of this approach can be summarized as follows.

  • There is no specific definition of life that usefully contributes to the search for life (see Chapter 5). Don't wait for one.

  • In searching for either extant or extinct life the most useful guide is the short list of the ecological requirements for life. These are: (a) energy, (b) carbon, (c) liquid water, and (d) other elements such as N, P, and S. On the planets of our Solar System liquid water is the limiting factor.

  • Life is composed of, and produces, organic (carbon-based) matter. Forget silicon-based life for now.

  • Organic matter of biological origin can be differentiated from other organic matter because life preferentially selects and uses a few specific organic molecules. This selectivity is probably a general feature of life.

  • […]

Page 99 of 153