To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The present article investigates the stability of Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a composite system consisting of a horizontal fluid layer overlying a fluid-saturated Darcy porous layer subjected to a time-periodic temperature distribution. The bottom surface is heated periodically with time, whereas a Biot number-dependent thermal boundary condition represents the heat transfer at the upper surface. The Beavers–Joseph–Saffman–Jones condition describes the ‘slip’ at the interface of the domains, and the Lions interface condition governs the normal force balance, incorporating a dynamic pressure term. The Chebyshev tau method and Fourier analysis are utilised to obtain linear instability bounds, which are compared with strong global and asymptotic limits derived from the nonlinear analysis using the energy method. Four deliberately chosen configurations of superposed fluid- and porous-layer systems are investigated. Two configurations validate the analysis through the limiting cases of the classical Darcy–Bénard and Rayleigh–Bénard systems obtained by setting the fluid-to-porous depth ratio $(\hat {d})$ to zero and infinity, respectively. The other two configurations involve layers with equal depths $(\hat {d} =1)$ and a shallow fluid layer overlying a porous layer $(\hat {d} \sim 0.1)$. For these cases, modulation substantially influences the onset of convection. In the last case, the linear theory points out that modulation parameters can control the dominant convective mode (fluid/porous). Furthermore, unlike the previously reported studies, the nonlinear stability bounds are found to be significantly lower than the linear instability bounds, indicating the possibility of subcritical instabilities in the presence of modulation. The region of subcritical instabilities increases with modulation amplitude.
Supersonic jets impinging on a ground plane produce a highly unsteady jet shear layer, often resulting in extremely high noise level. The widely accepted mechanism for this jet resonance involves a feedback loop consisting of downstream-travelling coherent structures and upstream-propagating acoustic waves. Despite the importance of coherent structures, often referred to as disturbances, that travel downstream, a comprehensive discussion on the disturbance convection velocity has been limited due to the challenges posed by non-intrusive measurement requirements. To determine the convection velocity of disturbances in the jet shear layer, a high-speed schlieren flow visualisation is carried out, and phase-averaged wave diagrams are constructed from the image sets. The experiments are conducted using a Mach 1.5 jet under various nozzle pressure ratios and across a range of impingement distances. A parametric analysis is performed to examine the influence of nozzle pressure ratio on the convection velocity and phase lead/lag at specific impingement distances. The results reveal that impingement tonal frequency is nearly independent of the disturbance convection velocity, except in cases of staging behaviour. They also demonstrated that slower downstream convection velocity of the disturbance corresponds to larger coherent structures, resulting in increased noise levels. Based on the observation of acoustic standing waves, an acoustic speed-based frequency model has been proposed. With the help of the allowable frequency range calculated from the vortex-sheet model, this model can provide a good approximation for the majority of axisymmetric impingement tonal frequencies.
One-degree-of-freedom flow-induced vibration (FIV) and energy harvesting through FIV of an elastically mounted circular cylinder with mechanically coupled rotation were investigated numerically for low Reynolds number 100, mass ratio 8 and a wide range of reduced velocities. The aims of this study are to investigate the effect of the flow direction angle $\beta$ on the vibration and energy harvesting through FIV. Two types of lock-in are found: vortex-induced vibration (VIV) and galloping. The response amplitude increases with the increase of $\beta$ in both regimes. Both VIV response and galloping regimes are found for $\beta$ = 45° to $\beta$ = 90°. For $\beta$ = −90° to $\beta$ = 0°, only VIV response regimes are found. The fluid force and fluid torque play different roles in exciting/damping the vibration. In the high-amplitude gallop regime, the fluid force excites the vibration, and the torque damps the vibration. Energy harvesting at flow direction angle 90° is investigated as this flow direction has the maximum galloping amplitude. The energy harvesting is achieved by a linear electric damping coefficient in the numerical model. The maximum harvestable power in the galloping regime is significantly greater than that in the VIV regime, and it increases with the increase of the reduced velocity. When the reduced velocity is 20, the harvested power is over 20 times that in the VIV regime, and can further increase if reduced velocity further increases. The maximum efficiency over all simulated parameters is 0.424, occurring when the reduced velocity is 20, and electric damping factor is 0.04.
Chapter 6, “A Deeper Layer of Reality,” describes my path to quarks, relating events starting as a graduate student in the spring of 1963 through the summer of 1964 when my work on quarks was essentially completed. A way of judging improbable theories is presented that, when applied to the quark model, pits the a priori likelihood that quarks exist against the difficulty of explaining the experimental data in a theory without quarks.
After a preliminary discussion of symmetry as applied to particle classification, and the constraints it places on the wave functions of particles, a detailed discussion of constituent quarks with spin is presented, based on my 1964 Erice Summer School Lectures. This takes place at two levels, first to capture the main ideas, then, with more detail, to enable the reader to decide if they would have believed that a fundamental theory based on quarks would eventually explain the strong interactions. Selection rules governing the change of strangeness in weak decays, and their relation to the change in charge of the strongly interacting particles, are derived. A graphical calculus based on quarks for calculating hadron couplings is introduced.
Chapter 5 focuses on Murray Gell-Mann who dominated particle physics for more than a decade starting in the mid-1950s. His perspective, style, and major contributions to physics, while I knew him, are described. A comparison of Feynman and Gell-Mann’s views on how to practice physics, and what they valued concludes this chapter.
A succession of toy field theories of increasing generality are described, the final one, missing all strong interactions, is based on mathematical quarks from which equal-time commutation relations of the weak and electromagnetic currents are abstracted. The Eightfold way and the Gell-Mann—Okubo mass formula are discussed, and Gell-Mann’s view of quarks is described in some detail. Examples of a darker side -- his pattern of inadequate attribution, that I only fully realized while writing this book -- are also given.
Gay and Meier asked if a trisection diagram for the Gluck twist on a spun or twist-spun 2-knot in $S^4$ obtained by a certain method is standard. In this paper, we show that the trisection diagram for the Gluck twist on the spun $(p+1,p)$-torus knot is standard, where p is any integer greater than or equal to 2.
Accurate reduced models of turbulence are desirable to facilitate the optimisation of magnetic-confinement fusion reactor designs. As a first step towards higher-dimensional turbulence applications, we use reservoir computing, a machine-learning (ML) architecture, to develop a closure model for a limiting case of electrostatic gyrokinetics. We implement a pseudo-spectral Eulerian code to solve the one-dimensional Vlasov–Poisson system on a basis of Fourier modes in configuration space and Hermite polynomials in velocity space. When cast onto the Hermite basis, the Vlasov equation becomes an infinitely coupled hierarchy of fluid moments, presenting a closure problem. We exploit the locality of interactions in the Hermite representation to introduce an ML closure model of the small-scale dynamics in velocity space. In the linear limit, when the kinetic Fourier–Hermite solver is augmented with the reservoir closure, the closure permits a reduction of the velocity resolution, with a relative error within 2 % for the Hermite moment where the reservoir closes the hierarchy. In the strongly nonlinear regime, the ML closure model more accurately resolves the low-order Fourier and Hermite spectra when compared with a naive closure by truncation and reduces the required velocity resolution by a factor of 16.
Chapter 4 on Richard Feynman, my theoretical physics thesis advisor, is a collection of vignettes that reveal aspects of behavior and thought that contributed to his mystique and unique accomplishments in physics.
After relating the history behind Feynman’s V-A theory of party violation, much of it in Feynman’s own words, the rest of the chapter is based on my personal interactions with Feynman lasting for a little more than twenty years, from the time I arrived at Caltech in 1959 till I left in 1981. Feynman’s attitude towards experimental results related to parity violation provides an informative background to how he would handle experimental information related to the discovery of quarks. The intent here, and in the remainder of the Chapter, is to give the reader a sense of how Feynman thought about physics, how he practiced it, and what he valued. His struggle with constituent quarks (aces), and what to make of them, lasted considerably longer than a decade, passing though several phases, including one with partons, but eventually ending with his fully accepting their reality.
Chapter 7, “Epilogue,” looks back on the discovery of quarks, identifies what of the original conception has survived, and what was missing. It also revives ideas that led to the discovery of quarks, long forgotten, that are relevant today. Lessons learned are highlighted.
The concepts underlying quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the quantum field theory based on quarks and gluons, are summarized. The discovery of the fourth ace (quark) in 1971 in Japan, and Petermann’s 1965 paper (“Properties of Strangeness and a Mass Formula for Vector Mesons”) are described. The split A2, exotics (tetraquarks and pentaquarks), the quark-gluon plasma, and the possibility of free fractionally charge particles are briefly recounted.
Chapter 2 chronicles the explosion in the number of strongly interacting particles, and efforts to understand them. It ends with an introduction to the discovery of quarks (originally called “aces”), and the resistance to accepting them for what they are: real particles that live in a deeper layer of reality.
The concepts of quantum number, resonance, and scattering cross section are explained, and the theories meant to explain the existence of strongly interacting particles are elucidated, including Fermi and Yang’s composite pion, Sakata’s composite hadrons, Chew and Frautschi’s “bootstrap,” and Heisenberg’s nonlinear spinor theory. The discovery of quarks suggested by the anomalous suppression of phi decay is detailed, and the importance of anomalies in physics is highlighted. Two remarkable meson and baryon mass relations are given. Both positive and negative reactions to the idea of quarks as constituents of hadrons are presented. Chapters 1 and 2 describe the recurring chaos and confusion that existed during the time between the discoveries of radioactivity and quarks. Once discovered, the path to the acceptance of quarks as real particles was equally confusing.
Chapter 3 on Alvin Tollestrup, my experimental physics thesis advisor, describes the singular contributions he made to physics, and what was required to practice experimental particle physics at the highest level. What I learned from him affected me profoundly, giving me the understanding of experiments necessary for the discovery of quarks.
Tollestrup: Developed photomultipliers as particle detectors to obtain the most acute values of the masses of the light elements. Designed the RF system and a million-volt pulse transformer to inject electrons into Caltech’s Synchrotron that observed the first pion-nucleon resonance beyond its peak. Found the pion’s beta decay into an electron and neutrino at CERN, removing the last obstacle to the acceptance of the V-A theory of parity violation. Performed the first users group experiment at the Bevatron. Designed the first superconducting magnets for Fermilab’s Tevatron. Helped convert the Tevatron to a proton-antiproton collider, the most powerful collider for 25 years until the LHC at CERN was constructed. For this work he received the National Medal of Technology and Innovation.