To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Einstein's theory of gravity can be difficult to introduce at the undergraduate level, or for self-study. One way to ease its introduction is to construct intermediate theories between the previous successful theory of gravity, Newton's, and our modern theory, Einstein's general relativity. This textbook bridges the gap by merging Newtonian gravity and special relativity (by analogy with electricity and magnetism), a process that both builds intuition about general relativity, and indicates why it has the form that it does. This approach is used to motivate the structure of the full theory, as a nonlinear field equation governing a second rank tensor with geometric interpretation, and to understand its predictions by comparing it with the, often qualitatively correct, predictions of intermediate theories between Newton's and Einstein's. Suitable for a one-semester course at junior or senior level, this student-friendly approach builds on familiar undergraduate physics to illuminate the structure of general relativity.
We present the first of two papers dedicated to verifying the Australian Epoch of Reionisation pipeline (AusEoRPipe) through simulation. The AusEoRPipe aims to disentangle 21-cm radiation emitted by gas surrounding the very first stars from contaminating foreground astrophysical sources and has been in the development for close to a decade. In this paper, we build an accurate 21-cm sky model that can be used by the WODEN simulation software to create visibilities containing a predictable 21-cm signal. We verify that the power spectrum (PS) estimator CHIPS can recover this signal in the absence of foregrounds. We also investigate how measurements in Fourier-space are correlated and how their gridded density affects the PS. We measure and fit for this effect using Gaussian-noise simulations of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) phase I layout. We find a gridding density correction factor of 2.651 appropriate for integrations equal to or greater than 30 minutes of data, which contain observations with multiple primary beam pointings and LSTs. Paper II of this series will use the results of this paper to test the AusEoRPipe in the presence of foregrounds and instrumental effects.
Exploration of the 21cm signal during the Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) can unravel the mysteries of the early Universe when the first stars and galaxies were born and ionised, respectively. However, the 21 cm signal is exceptionally weak, and thus, the detection amidst the bright foregrounds is extremely challenging. The Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) aims to measure the brightness temperature fluctuations of neutral hydrogen from the early Universe. The MWA telescope observes the radio sky with a large field of view (FoV) that causes the bright galaxies, especially near the horizon, to contaminate the measurements. These foregrounds contaminating the EoR datasets must be meticulously removed or treated to detect the signal successfully. The Central Redundant Array Mega-tile (CRAM) is a zenith-pointing new instrument, installed at the centre of the MWA Phase II southern hexagonal configuration, comprising of 64 dipoles in an $8 \times 8$ configuration with a FoV half the width of the MWA’s at every frequency under consideration. The primary objective of this new instrument is to mitigate the impact of bright radio sources near the field centre in accordance with the reduced primary beamshape and to reduce the contamination of foreground sources near the horizon with the reduced sidelobe response of the larger array configuration. In this paper, we introduce the new instrument to the community and present the system architecture and characteristics of the instrument. Using the first light observations, we determine the CRAM system temperature and system performance.
Since the turn of the century, astronomers have been exploiting the rich information afforded by combining stellar kinematic maps and imaging in an attempt to recover the intrinsic, three-dimensional (3D) shape of a galaxy. A common intrinsic shape recovery method relies on an expected monotonic relationship between the intrinsic misalignment of the kinematic and morphological axes and the triaxiality parameter. Recent studies have, however, cast doubt about underlying assumptions relating shape and intrinsic kinematic misalignment. In this work, we aim to recover the 3D shape of individual galaxies using their projected stellar kinematic and flux distributions using a supervised machine learning approach with mixture density network (MDN). Using a mock dataset of the EAGLE hydrodynamical cosmological simulation, we train the MDN model for a carefully selected set of common kinematic and photometric parameters. Compared to previous methods, we demonstrate potential improvements achieved with the MDN model to retrieve the 3D galaxy shape along with the uncertainties, especially for prolate and triaxial systems. We make specific recommendations for recovering galaxy intrinsic shapes relevant for current and future integral field spectroscopic galaxy surveys.
High-precision pulsar timing observations are limited in their accuracy by the jitter noise that appears in the arrival time of pulses. Therefore, it is important to systematically characterise the amplitude of the jitter noise and its variation with frequency. In this paper, we provide jitter measurements from low-frequency wideband observations of PSR J0437$-$4715 using data obtained as part of the Indian Pulsar Timing Array experiment. We were able to detect jitter in both the 300–500 MHz and 1 260–1 460 MHz observations of the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (uGMRT). The former is the first jitter measurement for this pulsar below 700 MHz, and the latter is in good agreement with results from previous studies. In addition, at 300–500 MHz, we investigated the frequency dependence of the jitter by calculating the jitter for each sub-banded arrival time of pulses. We found that the jitter amplitude increases with frequency. This trend is opposite as compared to previous studies, indicating that there is a turnover at intermediate frequencies. It will be possible to investigate this in more detail with uGMRT observations at 550–750 MHz and future high-sensitive wideband observations from next generation telescopes, such as the Square Kilometre Array. We also explored the effect of jitter on the high precision dispersion measure (DM) measurements derived from short duration observations. We find that even though the DM precision will be better at lower frequencies due to the smaller amplitude of jitter noise, it will limit the DM precision for high signal-to-noise observations, which are of short durations. This limitation can be overcome by integrating for a long enough duration optimised for a given pulsar.
In this chapter, the geometric description of generic branes in Yang–Mills matrix model is elaborated, and structures familiar from gravity are identified. The dynamics resulting from the classical model is interpreted as pre-gravity.
The solutions so far have all be “in vacuum,” away from sources. In this chapter, we study gravity “in material.” For comparison, we review the continuum form of Newton’s second law and think about Newtonian gravitational predictions for, for example, hydrostatic equilibrium. Then we develop the relativistic version of those equations directly from Einstein’s equation with various source assumptions (spherical symmetry, perfect fluid) and obtain the interior Schwarzschild solution. Cosmology is another example of working “in material,” and we briefly review the Robertson–Walker starting point and solutions both with and without a cosmological constant. At the end of the chapter, spacetimes requiring exotic sources, including the Ellis wormhole and Alcubierre warp drive, are described.
The general concept of quantization is discussed, which provides the starting point for the further developments in this book. Starting with the concepts familiar from quantum mechanics, a number of quantum spaces defined via explicit operators on Hilbert space are discussed in detail, including compact and non-compact examples.
With the form of the target theory built up over the previous two chapters, we move to a geometric description of gravitational motion. By recasting the relative dynamics of a pair of falling objects as the deviation of nearby geodesic trajectories in a spacetime with a metric, Einstein’s equation is motivated. To describe geodesic deviation quantitatively, the Riemann tensor is introduced, and its role in characterizing spacetime structure is developed. With the full field equation of general relativity in place, the linearized limit is carefully developed and compared with the gravito-electro-magnetic theory from the first chapter.
This final chapter provides a discussion of the BFSS matrix model, which defines the matrix quantum mechanics, providing another basis for Matrix theory. The relation between M-theory and the IKKT model is briefly discussed.
In this core chapter, the one-loop effective action for Matrix theory on 3 + 1 dimensional branes is elaborated, and the Einstein–Hilbert term is obtained in the presence of fuzzy extra dimensions. Some justification for the stability of the background is given.
This chapter discusses the central models of interest, dubbed Yang–Mills matrix models. We explain how quantum spaces are obtained as nontrivial backgrounds or vacua of these models. Their quantization is discussed, both from a perturbative as well as a nonperturbative point of view.
This chapter discusses the IKKT matrix model and its quantization. This model is the basis for Matrix theory, which is distinguished by maximal supersymmetry, leading to benign properties at the quantum level. The one-loop effective action is elaborated explicitly.