To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Our motivations for the creation of “Plaza del Ciel”
We consider that one of the most important aspects in the harmonic development of a person is his relationship with the natural environment in which he lives: in that environment he initially trains and enlarges his curiosity and the capacity for astonishment, both innate properties of human beings. It is so much so that we could locate the germ of all creative future activities, scientific or otherwise, in what happens with those characteristics during the years of childhood, that if fully developed will help children to become sensitive and critical adults. So we consider it necessary to generate the mechanisms to reinforce the sensibility, the critical observation and the interaction with natural phenomena, in a systematic way, as we propose in “Plaza del Cielo”.
Education by means of Astronomy is the principal nucleus of our proposal. This is so especially because we consider that those aspects of Nature studied by Astronomy and the way this science works is a powerful tool to motivate children and adults, that it is one of the best ways to study Nature, and that it brings us as educators new means to show the evolution and full integration among the many ways, not only scientific, Humanity has constructed throughout History in order to comprehend not only the Universe, but ourselves as well.
By
L.S. Kudashkina, Department of Astronomy, Odessa State University T.G.Shevchenko Park, Odessa 270014 Ukraine,
I.L. Andronov, Department of Astronomy, Odessa State University T.G.Shevchenko Park, Odessa 270014 Ukraine
The experience of working with amateur astronomers in the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States and in Ukraine shows a noticeable lack of literature, especially educational and methodological. The amateurs, possessing an observational base, do not know what best to observe at a given moment, and those, who are not yet ready for practical work in astronomy, do not know how to be prepared.
A series of brochures under the title “The Atlas of Amateur Astronomy”has been prepared, which pursues the purpose of delivering to amateurs a minimum of the necessary information on the following items:
Popular scientific reviews (lectures) on various directions in astronomy and astrophysics.
Methodological articles on the bases of observations and their processing.
Programs of observations, finding charts of variable stars, short information on comets, meteor showers etc.
Help material (tables, ephemerides, items of information from the General Catalogue of Variable Stars etc.).
Observations made by the amateurs themselves.
Five issues of “The Atlas of Amateur Astronomy”have been published. Together they contain information on about 60 objects, for which finding charts and comparison stars are given.
Part I contains the introductory articles, description of a structure of the atlas, which is repeated in the other issues, finding charts for 20 variable stars, recommendations for observations and the table of Julian dates from 1980 till 1995 (the atlas was issued in 1990).
Part II contains the first lecture from a cycle “Variety in the world of variable stars” on a theme “Long-period variables”. In this part the finding charts with comparison stars for 30 variables are given.
Introductory remarks on astronomy education in Croatia are given. Since the learning process is a complex intellectual and emotional process which should be supported during the interaction with the teacher, different approaches should be used. Tests could give useful insight into preconceptions. The following approaches should be balanced: historical approach, discovery approach (by the use of self-made tools and courtyard observations), and thorough inclusion of novel scientific results and views (to which a special precaution has been paid).
The Croatian Experience
This is a report about an experience in teaching astronomy to the students who will become teachers in physics or physics and mathematics. It should be stressed that astronomy in Croatia is not a standard subject in any schools, except as an elective course in some grammar and high schools; furthermore, astronomical concepts are partly exposed within physics.
The first step toward students should be mutual acquaintance. In order to test students’ previous knowledge, I used 20–25 questions mainly of a general nature (starting in 1975). I had the opportunity to teach at all four Croatian universities: Zagreb, Osijek, Rijeka and Split. People in these towns may have different backgrounds. Zagreb is the capital of Croatia and cosmopolitan. Osijek is the center of Slavonia and belongs to an agricultural and Panonian environment. Split is heart of Dalmatia and situated on the Adriatic Sea – in the Mediterranean region. Without regard to differences in life attitudes, temperament and historical background of populations, the test showed a low level of general knowledge in natural sciencies, especially regarding comprehension of objects and scientific terms.
We are all aware of the fact that Astronomy teaching is not an easy task for many different reasons which we are going to examine during this Colloquium. The present contribution focuses on one of these reasons we consider of major importance for Astronomy in the school: Teacher Training.
Teacher training has been debated extensively for a long time and discussion is being presently livened up.
Institutions and associations are promoting research, studies and comparisons on this issue. For instance, the Osnabriick conference “Teacher Education in Europe: Evaluation and Perspectives” (June 1995) – the International Forum of Rome (September 1995) and, specially devoted to Astronomy, the EU/ESO Workshop “Astronomy teaching in the European secondary school” (Garching, 1994), SAIt Workshop in Reggio Calabria “European Science Teacher Training” (September 1995), Conferences of Teaching Astronomy in Spain, the Constitutional Conference of the European Association for Astronomy Education (EAAE, Athens, 1995).
It is difficult to treat Astronomy teacher training without including it in a more general context. Teacher training does not only mean providing teachers with suitable teaching skills for each subject. First of all, teachers should bear in mind the interaction with a social and cultural reality that may affect learning processes. And the educational (and teaching) system is not neutral to the external framework. European and non-European countries have their own national differences with different school systems and choices made in the field of teacher training. Time does not allow us to go in detail into a comparison of the various solutions adopted in different countries.
Following the inclusion of Astronomy in the revised National Science Curriculum for England and Wales the Association for Astronomy Education, AAE, embarked on a programme of in-service training workshops for teachers to help them to understand the new ideas and deliver the new curriculum. Teacher confidence and knowledge has been the greatest challenge to establishing astronomy in school curricula. As part of the the AAE team I gave presentations on a host of activities including simple cut and paste sundials for pupil projects. We are now seven years on from the revised Science Curriculum and my interest in sundials has stepped up a gear. I have developed an interest in real dials, both studying existing dials and making dials for the homes of friends and families and for schools. This presentation, which has as its focus, the sundial as an architectural feature, uses slides I have taken of some of the dials to be seen in the central London area including some of my own. I am grateful to the British Sundial Society for a list of dial locations in London.
Understanding the hour lines – a model helps
To help explain how hour lines are related to the Suns motion I have developed a three dimensional stick and card model. The model, in four pieces, builds up gradually during a workshop presentation. I start with an equatorial dial showing 15 degree angles marked on an equatorial plane. (360 degrees / 24 hours – the only maths you really need to understand dials.)
By
J. V. Narlikar, Inter University Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007,
N.C. Rana, Inter University Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007
A summary of work related to astronomy education carried out during the last three years in India is presented here. Since India is a huge country and many educational efforts are made by individuals alone, this report cannot be regarded as complete, but a specific sampling.
General Information
India has more than 200 Universities, 8000 colleges, and about 100,000 schools, 33 planetaria, more than 100 museums and about 60 well known amateur astronomers' clubs. Scores of dedicated astronomy oriented school teachers, act as nuclei of astronomy education for the general public and school children.The astronomical almanac, used in a typical household is in some way related to the stars in the sky and the movements of the Sun, the Moon and the planets. Traditionally, a rudimentary knowledge of the celestial sphere is common. The recent developments in space technology have brought a fascination and glamour to modern astronomy for all age groups, and this is noticeably reflected in the number of media coverages of astronomy. There are about 12,000 telescopes of aperture no less than six inches, made by amateur astronomers.
Public Awareness
During the past three years there have been at least 300 six inch telescopes made by school children and laymen, under some project or other funded by the government and an equivalent number is also produced from private and individual resources. It takes about two weeks to grind and polish the mirror and assemble it in a suitable mount. After aluminizing the average cost comes out to be in the range US dollars 60–100, for a telescope of size greater than six inches.
Having recently returned to England (where I am an Open University tutor) after having spent about 18 years teaching Physics and Astronomy at the University of Nigeria at Nsukka in the Eastern part of Nigeria, I find myself in an unusual position to understand the difficulties of teaching such a rapidly changing subject as astronomy in an isolated place like Nsukka. For example I have seen a great contrast between the OU Astronomy and Planetary Science course material and the few available text books at Nsukka. Although not very mathematical, the OU material includes a lot of the latest research results and theories, whereas at Nsukka the books have hardly changed in the past 20 years.
I am aware that the Astronomy group at Nsukka is not unique. There are other small isolated groups of astronomers (or in some cases only a single astronomer) around the world who are trying to interest their students in astronomy against great odds. These astronomers appreciate the importance of astronomy in awakening interest in science and thus strengthening the basic sciences and developing technological progress. However Governments and even some international agencies often take the view that astronomy is a luxury that is not needed by such developing countries and therefore give little or no support to these efforts.
Main Problems
Apart from the lack of teaching materials, extremely limited access to computers and generally poor infrastructure, the one major problem is the extremely poor communications. Often phone, fax and mail do not work reliably, and needless to say there is no e-mail or internet.
from
2
-
Distance Learning and Electronic Media in Teaching Astronomy
By
M. Gerbaldi, Université de Paris Sud - XI Institut d'Astrophysique - CNRS 98 bis, Boulevard Arago, 75014 PARIS - FRANCE,
A. Xerri, Centre National d'Enseignement à Distance Institut de Vanves 60, Boulevard du Lycee - 92171 VANVES CEDEX - FRANCE
A distance teaching course in Astronomy was developed three years ago by the CNED (Centre National d'Enseignement Distance) in collaboration with professional astronomers from the University of Paris Sud XI.
We wish to present our course with:
the conceivers and designers’ point of view
the learners’ point of view.
Creation of the course.
Centre National d'Enseignement a Distance (CNED).
The CNED was created in 1939. It is a public administration under the supervision of the French Ministry of Education. Its first founding mission is to provide teaching and training to those who cannot take courses under usual conditions. But the CNED now operates at all the levels of the educational system from primary up to higher education, in all fields of training, initial, vocational and continuing education.
In 1995-1996, 360 000 students were registered in 2 500 training modules. Among them, 80% are adults, 190 000 on post baccalaureat level programmes (27 000 registered students reside outside France, in 176 countries).
A partnership between CNED and Paris XI University.
As no such course existed for astronomy, its creation was timely. So, as we did for meteorology in 1990, the CNED which does not deliver diplomas, offered and set up a partnership through an agreement with the University of Paris XI.
We worked with a team of Professors from that university, professional astronomers who are also well-known for working in collaboration with primary and secondary school teachers (CLEA).Together we decided, conceived and designed a remote teaching course with a multi-resource system.
A typical science course at the high school level includes some information on planets and their moons. For example, it is well-known that Jupiter has 16 moons and Saturn has 18 moons. Add to this the enthusiasm of the public in the collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter in July 1994. This immediately raises the possibility of a collision of a comet with a moon of Jupiter. Due to this possibility a strange fact about these moons comes into the picture, that is some of them are prograde in nature and some are retrograde. Can these two types of moons pose any problems in teaching? The present situation in education leads us to believe that they can pose some problems. It is described below, in support of this answer.
Educators from many countries have observed that the Aristotelian ideas continue to persist among graduates, in spite of learning Newtonian mechanics in colleges also. This is evident, for example, in the fact that many students think that a tangential force acts on a body performing circular motion, instead of the centripetal force. So the greatest and global problem is how to get rid of the tangential force from the minds of students and how to impregnate the centripetal force instead.
Recent history of science education reform in the USA
In 1981, in response to growing concerns that the United States was falling behind the rest of the world educationally, the federal Secretary of Education created a national commission on excellence in education. This commission was charged with gathering data about the status of U.S. education compared to the rest of the developed world and to define the problems which would have to be faced to successfully pursue the course of excellence in education.
In 1983 this commission issued its report, A Nation at Risk, (Secretary of Education, 1983). The release of this book produced a flurry of activity by schools, political entities and professional groups representing various educational disciplines. These groups included, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, the National Governors Association and the National Science Teachers Association and others. By 1989, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a major American organization representing a broad spectrum of the sciences, produced its own call for an improved educational climate for science and engineering. Their book, Science for All Americans, attempted to produce a comprehensive expression of the scientific community as to what constitutes literacy in science, mathematics and technology (Rutherford and Ahlgren, 1990). The release of this report, coming from a credible, broad-based and nationally recognized organization of scientists and engineers produced a great deal of interest in the American press and calls came for developing strategies for action.
For many years, copies on film of photographs, both direct and through objective prisms, taken with the 1.2 m United Kingdom Schmidt Telescope, have provided teaching material suitable for universities and colleges (Brück and Tritton, 1988). Table 1 outlines the various types of application to which the photographs may be put. With additional data, some real physics can be injected into the exercises, allowing students to perform quite elaborate projects.
Uses for UK Schmidt Telescope Film Copies
Direct photographs
1. Recognition of objects:
galaxies
minor planets
HII regions, SNRs (in external galaxies)
globular clusters (in the Magellanic Clouds)
2. Statistics
star-counts, for various purposes
number-magnitude counts
star-galaxy counts
galaxies in clusters
3. Changes in position (from more than one photograph)
precession
comet
Objective prism photographs
1. Spectral classification:
coarse classification (of about 100 stars per film)
2. Search for unusual objects:
emission-line stars
carbon stars
planetary nebulae
quasars
A limitation to such purely visual observations is in regard to photometry, where we have to make do with rather rough estimates of magnitude. Measuring the brightnesses or magnitudes of objects is a basic necessity in astronomy, but one that is, ironically, less easy to perform with students than it was ten or twenty years ago. Instruments that were once standard equipment and could be employed on the films – photographic photometers and microphotometers – have fallen into disuse as astronomers receive their data ready processed. For the brighter stars, down to magnitude 13 or 14, magnitudes may be estimated visually to about a fifth a magnitude. This is adequate, however, for our stellar statistics problems (e.g. Fig. 1).
The Dilemma of the Introductory Astronomy Laboratory
Were we meeting a century ago to discuss the state of astronomy education, we might have noted that remarkable changes were taking place in our field. The discipline, then regarded as a branch of geometry or mechanics, concerned itself primarily with the determination of positions in the heavens and the mapping of places on the earth. But with the advent of spectroscopy and the construction of large telescopes, astronomy was beginning to probe the how and the why of the heavens as well as the where and when. It was, in short, transforming itself into astrophysics, the study of the physical nature of the universe.
A century ago, we would have called for a change in the things we teach; and in fact there was such a change. When we look at the astronomy of the succeeding century, the material we now offer to introductory astronomy students at most universities and colleges, we see only a vestige of the earlier preoccupation with place and time. Judging by most textbooks, and by the course syllabi I have seen, most of us devote only a small fraction of our courses to astronomical coordinate systems, timekeeping, geodesy, and celestial mechanics. When we teach the solar system, we teach comparative planetology. When we teach the stars, we teach about main sequence and giant branch, about hydrostatic equilibrium and neutron degeneracy, about pulsars and supernovae. When we discuss the universe at large, we teach about the physics of the early universe, the dynamics of galaxies, and the fundamentals of general relativistic cosmology.
All living organisms develop from germs, that is to say, they owe their origins to other living beings. But how did the first living things arise?
A. I. Oparin, 1924 (quoted in Origins of Life, ed. D. W. Deamer and G. R. Fleischacker 1994)
The primordial Earth
Four and a half billion years ago, the proto-Earth was completing its formation. During the last accretion phases, its growing gravity had increased the impact velocities, so that their energies had been transformed into more and more heat. Hence the proto-Earth became progressively covered with a thick layer of molten lava, possibly to a very great depth.
The large-scale differentiation that separated the denser iron core from the mantle of lighter silicates was triggered by this intense heat. The last large impact occurred somewhat later, notably the one which, by a tangential grazing collision, caused the appearance of a transient ring around the Earth that rapidly became the Moon. The smaller cometary impacts, however, persisted and ended by establishing, not only the atmosphere and the oceans, but also the minor differentiation that separated the terrestrial crust from the underlying mantle.
The chemical and isotopic evidence that the terrestrial crust formed so early on was an enigma for geologists. It seems to be resolved by the cometary bombardment, when chondritic silicates were plowed deeply into the surface of the Earth after the separation of the core from the mantle.
To understand cosmic evolution, it was necessary first to evaluate the immense times involved. It began with geology. To find the age of a rock, one method came out on top: that of measuring the time elapsed from the moment when a radioactive element was confined in the rock. Uranium-238 (238U) suits this particularly well, because it decays into lead-206 (206Pb) with a half-life of 4.5 billion years. This half-life is the time needed for half of the radioactive substance to decay. After two half-lives, there is only ¼ left; after three half-lives, ⅛, etc. This is what is called an exponential decay.
The ratio of 238U to 206Pb present in a rock is a direct measure of the age of solidification of this rock. When a rock solidifies, the radioactive clock is reset to start at zero, because there is no 206Pb in the uranium oxide crystal just formed (lead remains in the liquid state in the original magma or lava). The rate of radioactive decay is extraordinarily constant, and nothing short of destroying the rock can influence it. This stems from the fact that radioactive reactions call for much higher energies than do chemical reactions.
The oldest terrestrial rocks are 3.8 billion years old. NASA astronauts have brought back lunar rocks; the oldest of them are 4.1 billion years old. Most of the carbonaceous chondrites (coming from the asteroid belt) are all of the same age: 4.6 billion years to within 0.1 billion years.
Chirality is the property of those molecules that can exist into two symmetrical forms corresponding to mirror reflections, but cannot be superimposed on each other by a mere rotation in space. Left-hand and right-hand gloves are an example of chirality. Chiral objects must be three-dimensional, since two symmetrical plane objects can always be superimposed by a reversal in space.
Many of the molecules used by life are chiral. However, when they exist in non-living matter, most of the time one half is in the right-hand form and the other half is in the left-hand form. This is what is called a racemic mixture. In contrast, life nearly always chooses only one of these two forms. For instance, all proteins consist of left-hand amino acids, whereas RNA and DNA are always built up from right-handed sugars. When a living organism dies and decays, thermal fluctuations change molecular shapes at random, so that, in the long run, there is racemization. Since the opposite process does not exist, a mechanism was needed to trigger the emergence of life by selecting preferentially one of the two chiral forms. The continuity of life then becomes only a mere copying process.
Was the choice random? Two forms of life of different chirality could have emerged. Left-handed proteins could have eliminated righthanded proteins by a random evolutionary process. This matter does not seem fundamental for elucidating the origins of life, because all biochemical processes depend on chemistry; that is, on the electromagnetic interaction which is mirror-symmetric.