To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Amateur high-resolution photography of the sun, moon, and planets is a neglected field. I must confess to having neglected it myself, favoring wide-field deep-sky work like so many other amateurs. But high-resolution solar-system photography has several attractions. You can do it in town or even in a large city; you don't have to go elsewhere in search of dark skies. You don't have to wait for the moon to get out of the way; in fact, the moon is one of the targets. Perhaps more importantly, the appearance of the sun and many of the planets is constantly changing, so it's worthwhile to keep photographing the same object; the pictures stand a good chance of having scientific value.
With the advent of digital image enhancement – which often improves planetary pictures dramatically – and the publication of excellent handbooks by Dobbins, Parker, and Capen (1988) and Dragesco (1995), interest in the solar system may be reviving. This chapter will tell you how to get started with this rewarding kind of work.
Film or CCD?
The advent of CCD imaging has made it easier than ever for amateurs to obtain excellent images of the sun, moon, and planets. My first CCD image of Jupiter, taken with an 8-inch telescope, surpassed all my earlier photographs. There are several reasons for this. Unlike a conventional camera, a CCD does not produce any shutter vibration.
The beginnings of this second international colloquium on Astronomy Teaching, eight years after the famous one in Williamstown, came during a meeting of Commission 46 in August 1994, in the Hague. It was then submitted as an IAU Colloquium by the President of Commission 46, John Percy, with the support of the newly born European Association for Astronomy Education.
When I was asked to chair the Scientific Organising Committee, I considered this proposal to be a great honour, that I acknowledge, and also an exciting way to learn more about the new developments in astronomy education that you are performing, so many of you, all around the world.
Then came a hard work! Step by step the programme was built, thanks to the help and suggestions from the SOC members, and I would like to mention more particularly Julieta Fierro, Andy Fraknoi, Barrie Jones, Derek McNally, John Percy.
It was my great pleasure, each day, to read your mails on my computer, or on the fax machine a pleasure mixed with some increasing anxiety, when their number began to grow rapidly! The Internet gives this beautiful possibility to interact so easily with people spread out all over the world – you have just to take account of the time zones, which could be also considered as a good astronomical exercise.
Eight years have elapsed since the first IAU Colloquium (No. 105) on astronomical education “The Teaching of Astronomy”. In that time there have been substantial changes in the world of education – not just astronomical education. On the one hand, there has been erosion of funding, while on the other there has been an unprecedented opening up of access to information: there has been a change from educational experiment towards more regulation of curricula and determination of standards. But, as a reading of this volume will clearly show, there is still a healthy creativity in astronomy education. There is much important new work being done – there are adventurous schemes in public education, there is new detailed research on how our students and pupils may learn and on the portfolio of misconceptions under which they may be labouring when first confronted with astronomical teaching. One of the new features since 1988 is access to the Internet. An overwhelming variety of information is now readily available from the latest Hubble Space Telescope picture to the Web Page of the local astronomy society. But it is also clear that the sheer richness and variety of the Internet offering creates yet another problem – how to organise that information to maximum teaching and learning benefit. The North American continent is once again in a period of curriculum renewal and it is of great interest to see the interaction between that renewal, electronic media and the Internet. Such enterprises are receiving support in particular from the National Science Foundation in the USA. It is encouraging to see that the Internet is being used to support undergraduate projects.
School education in Latvia, as in many other countries, is divided into two stages: primary and secondary education. Primary education is compulsory. Every year 30 000 new school children start attending primary school. This is a potential audience that can study astronomy fundamentals. During first grade studies school children learn the basics of natural science which include some elements of astronomy. These lessons are given once a week. At this stage children's interest in the Universe is great; therefore the most active teachers use some out of curriculum activities to give the schoolchildren an idea about the stars, planets and other celestial bodies. The science curriculum itself contains very few elements of astronomy (Karule, 1995). Even more many teachers have problems teaching science at the elementary school, because they are afraid that it is too sophisticated. This situation should be corrected, but at the moment no teacher training in science is planned.
In higher grades of primary school some astronomy elements are taught in different disciplines. In geography there are some topics about the Earth, Seasons and Tides (Klavins, 1992). In physics there are some topics about Eclipses of the Sun and the Moon (Kokare, 1992). And that is all. It leads to the situation that a young person, graduated from primary school, has heard nothing about constellations, Moon phases, comets and many other astronomy questions.
The expected positive changes are the following: new textbooks of the basics of natural science, where more attention is paid to astronomy, are being developed. The textbook for 1st grade has already been published (Vaivode et al., 1995), the others will follow.
In recent years much research into conceptual understanding of science has been carried out. Oddly, Astronomy (one of the smallest sciences in terms of pupil numbers) is possibly one of the most widely studied subjects, with numerous papers being produced revealing the intuitive ideas of (usually) young school children. Within these papers it is generally recognised that if students cannot assimilate the fundamental concepts of a subject, then their own initial frameworks are altered accordingly, producing mis-conceptions.
Much of this research into pre/mis-conceptions, alternative frameworks etc, has been concerned with the knowledge of gravity or the shape of the Earth, the Sun and other such bodies. Another area heavily researched is that of phases/eclipses, and how the young children of today perceive these phenomena.
The research presented here takes the findings from earlier papers and extends it by assessing astronomy students at the University of Plymouth. The experiment probed two areas, the phases and eclipses of the moon and Sun and the ability of students to de-centre.
Previous Studies
It has been known for many years now that children usually start to think of the Earth as flat (Vosniadou et al (1989)), with age usually removing or adjusting initial frameworks. This may be demonstrated by assuming we have two children, A and B, which both hold the notion of a flat Earth. From the flat Earth model, child A may ‘leap’ to the concept of a spherical Earth straight away; the child's flat Earth conceptions have been removed and replaced with a model which the child is able to associate with ‘space’ and thus a spherical Earth.
Students come into our classrooms with many misconceptions about science in general and astronomy in particular (see numerous papers and references in Novak, 1993 and Pfundt & Duit 1993). These beliefs evolve from a variety of sources throughout childhood and adolescence (Comins, 1993a, 1993b, 1995). I have found that directly addressing these incorrect beliefs in the context of their origins helps my students replace them with correct knowledge. By understanding the origins of their misconceptions students can screen information more effectively, i.e., they learn to think more critically. My purpose in this paper is to briefly identify origins of misconceptions and classroom techniques for replacing them.
I define misconceptions as deep seated beliefs that are inconsistent with accepted scientific information. Unless we directly address these incorrect ideas at their roots, most students cannot replace them with correct knowledge. Most students retain correct material only long enough to pass tests, and then lapse into believing their prior misconceptions.
In previous works (Comins, 1993a & 1995) I identified a heuristic set of origins that account for all the misconceptions I have identified. It is well worth noting that such a list is by no means unique and, given that I have since added another category, nor is it complete. Nevertheless, this set of origins is an extremely practical one, providing a significant set of tools for understanding and dissecting misconceptions and how these beliefs are used by different people. In an effort to make this set more tractable, I have now revised it to an even dozen (see Sections 1.1–1.12).
By
J.H. Parkinson, School of Science and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, Pond Street, Sheffield SI 1WB,
D. Ashton, School of Science and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, Pond Street, Sheffield SI 1WB,
K. Atkin, School of Science and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, Pond Street, Sheffield SI 1WB,
B. Harrison, School of Science and Mathematics, Sheffield Hallam University, Pond Street, Sheffield SI 1WB
The Star Centre is a national astronomy and space science base which
facilitates public access to news and information
promotes public awareness, interest, enjoyment and understanding.
The Star Centre meets these twin aims by providing an information service which can be accessed in a variety of ways and by offering a menu of public observing events.
The concept of a national astronomy base developed as part of the Centre for Science Educations growing portfolio of initiatives in both the formal education sector and the wider umbrella of the Public Understanding of Science. In December 1996 the Star Centre was launched with the aid of a Royal Society COPUS development grant and matching funding from Sheffield Hallam University.
This paper summarises the main activities of the Star Centre, gives some impression of the public response and outlines plans for future development.
The Star Centre in Context
The Star Centre reaches out directly to schools and the general public and is part of the growing network of long-term projects at the Centre for Science Education (CSE) within the School of Science and Mathematics as shown in Figure 1. The largest of these projects is the UK Research Council funded Pupil Researcher Initiative (PRI) in which school pupils in the 14–16 age range explore science topics through research briefs. The PRI provides resources, activities, strategies and support for science teachers and their pupils so that pupils will experience the excitement and relevance of science and engineering research and so develop a lasting interest and enthusiasm. All aspects of the research process are involved and there are opportunities for Science Fairs, Pupil Researcher Conferences and Roadshows.
The reader of this proceedings volume might ask why was it thought interesting to publish a few pages about the posters presented at IAU Colloquium 162? It had been decided that indeed the history of the meeting would not have been complete without some words about the poster presentations. The final success of the entire Colloquium depended on all presentations, either oral or poster.
The posters themselves have been different but it has been interesting to note that sometimes similar projects and ideas have been elaborated at very distant places in the world.
The basis of our teaching should be related to our roots; we ought to mention old traditions in our own country, such as the cosmological ideas of old Guarani Indians or the story of the first South American 18th century. Observatory of F. Buenaventura Suarez which have been shown by A. E. Troche Boggino of the University of Asuncion, Paraguay. However, I found most interesting the history of evolution of the human mind as depicted by the diagram of A. E. Troche Boggino showing chronological sequences of contemporary scientists, philosophers, writers, painters, sculptors and composers, from the times of Copernicus to the present day. It is easy to make a perpendicular cut or cross-section of the diagram at a given epoch, for instance that of Copernicus, and get to know what other famous persons have been living during his life-time.
In another part of the world, at the University of Glamorgan, UK, Mark Brake had been also in favour of a historical/cultural approach when telling his audience scientific facts, both when dealing with university students and with the general public.
Comets and quasars, black holes and the big bang, pulsars and planets all feature in the media and excite people to find out more – astronomy might be described as the popular face of modern science. In the UK, recent changes in Advanced Level (A-level) physics courses mean that many students have the option of studying astrophysics to a depth beyond the merely descriptive. This option is proving popular with teachers and students, but presents particular challenges shared by few other areas of A-level physics courses.
Astrophysics within A-level physics
A-level courses are taken by students who choose to stay in education beyond the age of sixteen. Students typically study three subjects at A-level over the course of two years. A-level is approximately equivalent to 12th grade and the first year of a bachelors degree in the USA. Students are awarded grades for their A-level work which depend on their performance in external examinations and on evidence of experimental skills collected by their teachers. The examinations are set, and the grades awarded, by independent examination boards which specify the content on which students are to be examined and the skills for which teachers are required to provide evidence. For many students, A-levels are a preparation for more advanced study at university.
Fifty percent of the content of all A-level physics syllabuses is now defined nationally (School Curriculum and Assessment Authority, 1994), whereas previously the examinations boards had a greater degree of autonomy. Current syllabuses have been discussed and summarized by Avison, 1994; most consist of a compulsory element, with a menu of optional topics of which students must study (and be examined on) a specified number.
The total solar eclipse of October 24, 1995, whose central line cut across the subcontinent of India, was only the second total solar eclipse visible from India in this century. The previous total eclipse visible from India occurred on February 16, 1980. At that time the print media filed widely varying reports on what the effect of seeing the eclipse would be, without much coordinated input from astronomers. With the new confused advice reinforcing old fears, almost the entire population literally hid indoors, fearing the worst. Many Indian astronomers silently resolved to themselves then, that public education must be taken up with the same level of seriousness as research programmes during the next eclipse.
The Background
The total solar eclipse of October 24,1995 was visible along some of the most populated parts of India and took place during a season of generally clear skies. Elsewhere in the country the eclipse would be partial. So nation-wide, our class was a mere 900 million strong!
Even in the last decade of this century, astronomy education in India is very sparsely serviced below the post graduate level. Several new planetaria have been built around the country since 1980. Clearly they would play a role in public education. So our 900 million strong class could be apportioned between them as far as public education was concerned. But the school, undergraduate and amateur sectors continue to suffer from lack of focussed attention. Here, however, the numbers involved would be much smaller. The Nehru Planetarium decided to use this opportunity to design activities not only for the general public, but also for specific groups of school students, undergraduates and amateurs.
In 1986, a group of university astrophysics institutes in eleven Western European countries established a federation known as the European Astrophysics Doctoral Network (EADN). The aims of the EADN, then and now, are to stimulate the mobility of postgraduate students in astrophysics within Europe, and to organize pre-doctoral astrophysics schools for graduate students at the beginning of their PhD research. The network has by now expanded to include about 30 institutes in 17 Western European countries, and ways are being actively sought for expanding the EADN even further to include Eastern and Central Europe. The coordinators have been Prof. Jean Heyvaerts (France) until 1992, Prof. Loukas Vlahos (Greece) 1992-1993 and myself since 1993. The network is financially supported by the European Union “ERASMUS” and the “Human Capital & Mobility” programmes as well as by national funds.
The Student Mobility Scheme
The Student Mobility Scheme has been designed to encourage postgraduate, or in some cases senior graduate, students to undertake part of their doctoral or diploma thesis research at an institute which is part of the network. It offers ERASMUS funded grants intended to cover student travel expenses and extra expenses encountered by the student caused by living away from their home institute. The grants are not full grants since it is expected that the student can retain the home grant while at the partner institute. The duration of the visit is usually anywhere between 3 and 12 months and must be preceded by contacts between the student's regular thesis advisor and the network partner advisor.
By
L. Gouguenheim, Université de Paris Xl-Sud and Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon, France,
M. Gerbaldi, Université de Paris Xl-Sud and Institut dAstrophysique de Paris 98bis Brd Arago 75014 Paris, France
Informal and formal astronomy education is present through many channels: newspapers and TV; amateur associations; clubs and science associations; at school at any level. The teachers are not only the main agents of the educational process at school, but they are also very active in extra-curricular activities: they run clubs, educational projects etc.
These activities are present everywhere in the world, as can be seen from the reading of the National Reports published every 3 years by Commission 46 “Astronomy Teaching” of the International Astronomical Union and published in its Newsletter.
A quick look at these reports shows that there is a huge variety of educational systems from one country to another: some countries have a specific curriculum in astronomy, others are just beginning to develop it; in other places, astronomy has been considerably reduced in the newly created curricula. One more difference: in some countries, education has a national curriculum; in others the responsibility for teaching is left entirely to each Province, a term used here to refer to the local situation. Such a situation and its consequences was were depicted by Wentzel (Williamstown IAU Colloquium 105, 1986).
Why Astronomy in the curricula?
In spite of these differences, a general trend can be drawn: it is very rare that astronomy is considered as a separate subject; it is nearly everywhere part of the programme either of Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry or Natural Sciences.
Astronomy is, inherently, a high-interest subject. However, at the high school level there is a tendency to teach astronomy using higher-level abstractions and complex mathematics. This teaching approach thus eliminates a large number of students who have difficulties with abstractions and complex mathematics, thereby restricting the study of astronomy to a rather select group of students.
The astronomy course offered since 1976 at Wauwatosa West High School was developed to reach a wide range of students with differing abilities. The prerequisite for this one-semester elective course is the successful completion of one year of high school science. Most of the students enrolled in this course are high school juniors and seniors, ages 16-18. Since algebra is not a prerequisite, the “math phobic” students have been attracted to the course. The higher ability students enjoy the challenges posed by astronomy and often take this course as a supplement to their physics classes. Students who normally have difficulty with science suddenly discover that they can succeed in astronomy, and we have introduced a whole new group of students to this high-interest subject.
Activities
Our astronomy course focuses on hands-on activities, which can illustrate higher-level abstractions in a more concrete manner. In particular, we use Project STAR activities, which were developed at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Our text is also the Project STAR textbook (Coyle, et al, 1993). The following subsection will illustrate some of these hands-on activities.
Orientation: Celestial Sphere
[Slide: exterior of Wauwatosa West High School] Wauwatosa West High School is located in a suburb of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on the western shore of Lake Michigan.
Imagine trying to teach reading to students who do not know the alphabet or driving to someone who does not know the purpose of the brake. As teachers, we have a view of what the fundamental ideas that our field are and make decisions about their coverage and order in our courses. Yet, research shows that students rarely have the foundation that we expect; they hold misconceptions about the physical world that actually inhibit the learning of many scientific concepts. Moreover, the metaphors that we employ for building student understanding: reliving the historical development of the field, journeying from the closest to farthest reaches of the universe, and observing the objects in the sky, are only based on our own beliefs in their effectiveness. Empirical evidence shows that they are of little value; there is rarely any lasting change in students’ conceptual understanding in science. Yet, by testing large populations, one can tease out the relative difficulty of astronomical conceptions, which misconceptions inhibit understanding of scientific ideas, and which concepts are prerequisites for others. These relationships allow the determination of an intrinsic structure of astronomical concepts, the way in which novices to experts appear to progress naturally through to an understanding of the field. Such a structure has application in the classroom. Certain ideas appear to be so fundamental to understanding light, scale, and gravity that no headway can be made until they are mastered. If we learn to set realistic goals for our students and teach the prerequisite notions prior to the more exotic ones, we may be able to optimize student learning and build understanding that outlasts the final exam.
The status of teaching Astronomy in European countries is variable. Sometimes Astronomy appears as a compulsory subject or as an optional subject, but on many occasions Astronomy appears within another subject, depending on the country. It is even possible for Astronomy not to appear anywhere in the curriculum. But of course the position here is better than in other less developed places. In Europe there are various topics which can be organized into two main groups: aspects related to relative motions and aspects related to properties of light. Some examples of teaching activities and materials in various countries will be described.
It is also necessary to emphasize several initiatives such as the review of Astronomy curricula, the publication of general books on Astronomy for secondary schools and the organisation of new journals to promote Astronomy in schools.
It is essential to mention the new European Association for Astronomy Education (EAAE) founded last November in Athens. This meeting was attended by 100 teachers and astronomy professionals from 17 European countries. It is hoped that this, in conjuntion with the other initiatives, will do much to encourage the study of Astronomy.
Relative Motions.
In this field, as in others, there is some very interesting material promoted by the Comite de Liaison Enseignants et Astronomes (CLEA) in France. Denise Wacheux has produced a special umbrella which is used to study the movement of the Sun and celestial sphere in relation to the horizon, and which has very interesting didactic applications in secondary schools. It is possible to change the latitude and to move the umbrella around its axis.