Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide(1). The microbiota-gut-brain axis may play a role in the aetiology of depression, and probiotics show promise for improving mood and depressive state(2). Further evidence is required to support mechanisms and in high-risk populations, such as those with sub-threshold depression (which may be 2-3 times more prevalent than diagnosed depression)(3). The aims were to assess the efficacy of a probiotic compared with placebo in reducing the severity of depressive symptoms in participants with subthreshold depression, and to investigate potential mechanistic markers of inflammatory, antioxidant status and stress response. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in participants meeting diagnosis of subthreshold depression (DSM-5); aged 18-65 years; ≥18.5 kg/m2 body mass index; not taking antidepressants, centrally acting medications, probiotics nor antibiotics for at least 6 weeks. The probiotic (4 × 109 AFU/CFU, 2.5 g freeze-dried powder containing Lactobacillus fermentum LF16 (DSM26956), L. rhamnosus LR06 (DSM21981), L. plantarum LP01 (LMG P-21021), Bifidobacterium longum BL04 (DSM 23233)) or placebo was taken daily for 3-months. Data was collected at 3 study visits (pre-, mid- (6 weeks), post-intervention). Self-reported questionnaires measured psychological symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI; Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, HADS) and quality of life. Blood and salivary samples were collected for biomarkers including cortisol awakening response (CAR). General linear models examined within-group and between-group differences across all time points. Thirty-nine participants completed the study (n = 19 probiotic; n = 20 placebo) using intention-to-treat analysis. The probiotic group decreased in BDI score by −6.5 (95% CI −12.3; −0.7) and −7.6 (95% CI −13.4; −1.8) at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. The HADS-A score decreased in the probiotic group by −2.8 (95% CI −5.2; −0.4) and −2.7 (95% CI −5.1; −0.3) at 6 and 12, respectively. The HADS-D score decreased in the probiotic group by −3.0 (95% CI −5.4; −0.7) and −2.5 (−4.9; −0.2) at 6 and 12 weeks of intervention, respectively. No between group differences were found. There were no changes in perceived stress or quality of life scores. The probiotic group had reduced hs-CRP levels (7286.2 ± 1205.8 ng/dL vs. 5976.4 ± 1408.3; P = 0.003) and increased total glutathione (14.2 ± 8.9 ng/dL vs. 9.3 ± 4.7; P = 0.049) compared to placebo, post intervention. Lower levels of CAR were found in the probiotic compared to placebo (−0.04 ± 0.17 μg/dL vs. 0.16 ± 0.25; P = 0.009). A significant reduction in depressive symptoms and anxiety was observed within the probiotic group only. These results were supported by improvements observed in biomarkers, suggesting probiotics may improve psychological wellbeing in adults experiencing sub-threshold depression, by potential pathways involved in central nervous system homeostasis and inflammation. Future analyses are required to understand changes within the intestinal microbiota and to clarify how their metabolites facilitate emotional processing.

Nutrition transitions are key contributors to the obesity epidemic plaguing South Pacific Island countries (SPIC). Prior to European contact and colonisation, traditional Pacifica diets consisted mainly of root crops, indigenous fruits and vegetables, freshwater proteins and seafood(1). This diet has been replaced by diets high in processed foods which are high in salt, sugar and unhealthy fats(2). Various political, economic, environmental and socio-cultural factors have been associated with the proliferation of unhealthy foods in Pacifica diets. However, very few studies have examined how these changes have impacted individual food choices. This study aims to address the gap in the knowledge of food choice motives of Pacific Islanders. An online qualitative survey was used(1) to explore how the nine food choice motives in the widely used Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ)(3) impact food choice and (2) to identify additional food choice motives, not captured in the FCQ. The first section of the survey included open-ended questions which explored the top three food choice motives of the participants. This section was followed by a series of open-ended questions exploring participant’s views on the nine food choice motives from the FCQ. The last part of the survey asked participants to identify any other food choice motives which were not already identified in the survey. An exploratory qualitative approach, employing inductive and deductive thematic analyses, was used to analyse results(4). The sample (N = 105) was predominantly female (73%), living with family (72%) and the average age was 22.06 years (S.D = 5.0). It consisted of 28% indigenous Fijians, 26% Fijians of Indian descent, 15% Solomon Islanders, 13% I-Kiribati and smaller percentages of students from Niue (3%), Samoa (5%), Tonga (5%) and Vanuatu (5%). Of the nine FCQ motives, the most commonly identified top three food choice motives included price (n = 54), health (n = 45), and sensory appeal, especially taste (n = 40). Participants also identified three new food choice motives which many ranked in their top three motives: satiety concerns (n = 22), food quality and hygiene when eating out (n = 26) and religious or cultural food restrictions (n = 11). Additionally, issues with face validity of the health, convenience, price, weight control and familiarity food choice motives from the FCQ were identified. These findings highlight the importance of validity studies prior to using FCQ, and more broadly other similar instruments, with understudied populations like that of SPIC. The findings also provided important insights into the food choice motives of Pacific Islanders and can inform public health interventions for encouraging healthy eating. Further research using an adapted FCQ with larger and diverse samples will increase its effectiveness of measuring food choice motives in the region.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by a deficiency in insulin production and consequent hyperglycaemia. A glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value < 53 mmol/mol (< 7%) is recommended to reduce the risk for diabetes-specific complications(1). However, most adolescents and young adults (AYAs) have an HbA1c above the target(2). Dietary behaviours, including a routine meal plan with snacks, play a significant role in self-management(3). Snacks without an insulin bolus, grazing or snacking to cope with stress contribute to out-of-target glucose levels. Although modifying AYAs’ snacking behaviours could be a low-cost, equitable, and effective approach to improving glycaemic control, there is a dearth of evidence to inform effective snacking interventions. Importantly, no brief, validated tool exists to assess snacking behaviour among individuals with T1D. This research explored the acceptability and feasibility of validating a snacking questionnaire adapted for AYAs with T1D; a crucial step before a larger validation study. Twenty-five AYAs (aged 13-20 years) with T1D and receiving diabetes care through Te Whatu Ora Southern were invited to participate in a feasibility study. Purposive sampling was used for maximum variability in participants’ demographic characteristics. All study procedures were completed remotely, with electronic questionnaires administered in the morning via a secure web platform. On days 1 and 8 of the 8-day study, participants completed a 30-item snacking questionnaire that assessed the timing and frequency of snacking and types of food or drinks consumed as a snack in the past seven days. The snacking questionnaire was adapted from questionnaires previously used in population-level surveys. An experienced diabetes dietitian ensured that items reflected foods commonly consumed by AYAs with T1D. Before recruitment, two diabetes dietitians and a young adult with T1D critically reviewed the adapted snacking questionnaire. On days 2-8, participants recalled their snacking behaviour (timing, frequency, food/drink consumed) over the previous day. The proportion of completed snacking questionnaires assessed feasibility, defined as a response rate ≥ 80%. The ease of completing the snacking questionnaires was self-reported on a Likert-type scale (1-completely agree, 5-completely disagree) to assess acceptability, defined as ≤ 20% of participants reporting the questionnaires were not easy to complete. Participants (n = 10) were aged 16.2 ± 1.69 years, 60% male, and 90% self-identified as New Zealand or Other European. All participants completed the proposed validation study. Most (95%) of the snacking questionnaires were completed. All (100%) daily snacking behaviour questionnaires were completed. All participants (100%) agreed that the questionnaires were easy to complete. The snacking behaviours questionnaire validation procedures are feasible and acceptable to New Zealand and Other European AYAs with T1D. Feasibility and acceptability must be explored among ethnically diverse AYAs before conducting a larger rigorous validation study.

The traditional Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) is consistent with a dietary pattern and time-honoured eating behaviours by populations living in the olive-tree growing areas of the Mediterranean basin before the mid-1960’s. The MedDiet is described in the literature as a plant-based dietary pattern, consistent with a high intake of vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, wholegrains cereals, and daily use of extra-virgin olive oil incorporated into all meals; moderate consumption of fish, shellfish, fermented dairy products (cheese and yogurt), and wine (typically during meals); and a low or infrequent consumption of meat and processed meat products, processed cereals, sweets, vegetable oils, and butter(1). Being predominately plant-based, the MedDiet is naturally low in saturated fat, and rich in several functional components, including vitamins and minerals, carotenoids, unsaturated fatty acids, and phenolic compounds, depicted by antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. As a result of its putative beneficial health effects, the MedDiet is one of the most widely evaluated dietary patterns in the scientific literature(2). In both observational and intervention studies, there is a large and consistent body of evidence to support that a MedDiet is protective against chronic and inflammatory conditions, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, management and prevention of type 2 diabetes, central adiposity, cancer, neurodegenerative conditions, and frailty(3). The effect of the MedDiet on women’s reproductive health is an emerging area in the literature. There have been a range of studies (observational and interventional) examining outcomes related to menarche, menstrual cycle, pregnancy, infertility, lactation, and menopause. The MedDiet has also been studied for the management of conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome and endometriosis. These conditions are often associated with hormonal imbalances, inflammation, and oxidative stress, all of which can be influenced by the diet’s key components. The MedDiet may be a promising nutritional strategy for promoting women’s reproductive health. However, more extensive, and rigorous studies, including randomized controlled trials and longitudinal investigations, are necessary to establish a causal relationship between the MedDiet and women’s reproductive health outcomes. While the adoption of a MedDiet in non-Mediterranean populations is appealing, consideration needs to be given about potential barriers and enablers towards adherence(4). Furthermore, while the primary focus has been on nutritional strategies within the framework of the Mediterranean Diet, equal attention must be given to the eating behaviours and lifestyle factors associated with it.

Unhealthy food environments are major drivers of obesity and diet-related diseases(1). Improving the healthiness of food environments requires a widespread organised response from governments, civil society, and industry(2). However, current actions often rely on voluntary participation by industry, such as opt-in nutrition labelling schemes, school/workplace food guidelines, and food reformulation programmes. The aim of the REFORM study is to determine the effects of the provision of tailored support to companies on their nutrition-related policies and practices, compared to food companies that are not offered the programme (the control). REFORM is a two-country, parallel cluster randomised controlled trial. 150 food companies were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive either a tailored support intervention programme or no intervention. Randomisation was stratified by country (Australia, New Zealand), industry sector (fast food, other packaged food/beverage companies), and company size. The primary outcome is the nutrient profile (measured using Health Star Rating [HSR]) of foods and drinks produced by participating companies at 24 months post-baseline. Secondary outcomes include company nutrition policies and commitments, the nutrient content (sodium, sugar, saturated fat) of products produced by participating companies, display of HSR labels, and engagement with the intervention. Eighty-three eligible intervention companies were invited to take part in the REFORM programme and 21 (25%) accepted and were enrolled. Over 100 meetings were held with company representatives between September 2021 and December 2022. Resources and tailored reports were developed for 6 touchpoints covering product composition and benchmarking, nutrition labelling, consumer insights, nutrition policies, and incentives for companies to act on nutrition. Detailed information on programme resources and preliminary 12-month findings will be presented at the conference. The REFORM programme will assess if provision of tailored support to companies on their nutrition-related policies and practices incentivises the food industry to improve their nutrition policies and actions.

Recent studies have documented the importance of postprandial hyperglycaemia in the incidence of chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes. Inhibition of digestive enzymes, including membrane-bound brush-border α-glucosidases, leads to slowed carbohydrate digestion and absorption, and reduced postprandial glycemia. Nuts are widely eaten around the world and have the potential to inhibit α-glucosidases through their content of polyphenols and other bioactive compounds. According to our recent systematic review(1), no study has investigated the inhibitory effects of nut extracts on human α-glucosidase activities. Almost all studies in this area have been conducted on yeast α-glucosidase, with only a few using rat α-glucosidase. While there is no sequence homology between yeast and human α-glucosidase, there is 74% to 78% sequence homology between rat and human α-glucosidases(1). The lack of studies on the effect of bioactive compounds from nuts on human α-glucosidases, along with the growing attention to nuts as an important component of a healthy diet with the potential to reduce the risk of chronic diseases(2), highlights the need for research to evaluate the inhibitory effect of nut extracts on human α-glucosidases. The aim of the current study is to explore the inhibitory effect of extracts from nuts on human carbohydrate digestive enzymes. Walnuts and almonds were ground and defatted with hexane, extracted in 80% (v/v) acetone, and further purified using solid-phase extraction to obtain phenolic-rich extracts. The Folin–Ciocalteu assay was used to approximate the polyphenol content of the samples. Following our recently published detailed protocol(3), cell-free extracts from human intestinal Caco-2/TC7 cells were used as a source of α-glucosidase in enzyme inhibition assays, with sucrose, maltose and isomaltose as substrates and appropriate controls. The assay products were quantified using high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). Glucose production in the presence of various concentrations of phenol-rich nut extracts was compared using a one-way ANOVA and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated. The Folin–Ciocalteu data demonstrate that walnut extracts comprise a relatively high polyphenol content, with 18.1 ± 0.23 mg (epigallocatechin gallate [EGCG] equivalent) per gram of fresh weight, while almond extracts contain 0.87 ± 0.03 mg EGCG equivalent/g of fresh weight. The walnut phenolic-rich extract dose-dependently inhibited human intestinal sucrase and maltase activities (both p<0.01), with IC50 values of 1.67 mg/mL and 2.84 mg/mL, respectively. We demonstrate that phenolic-rich walnut extracts can inhibit human α-glucosidases in vitro and therefore walnuts may contribute to slowing carbohydrate digestion in humans. As such, we plan to assess the effects of walnuts on postprandial glycaemia in vivo.

Food insecurity, the inadequate or insecure access to food due to financial constraints, is a growing concern in high-income countries like Australia(1). Food insecure adults may have reduced diet quality due to constraints on food purchasing and consumption(2) but further research is needed to understand how the severity of food insecurity impacts diet quality in an Australian setting. This study aimed to examine the relationship between diet quality and increasing severity of household food insecurity using validated measurement tools. A cross-sectional, online survey of Australian adults (aged 18 years+) used the USDA Household Food Security Six-item Short Form to classify respondents as food secure or marginally, moderately, or severely food insecure. The Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS; score between 0–73) determined diet quality (ARFS total) and sub-scale scores for eight food groups(3), with higher scores indicating higher diet quality. Diet quality score results are further categorised as “needs work” (<33), “getting there” (33-38), “excellent” (39-46) or “outstanding” (47+). Survey-weighted linear regression (adjusted for age, sex, income, education, location, household composition) analyses indicate that 45% of participants were living in households that experienced food insecurity, comprising 7% marginally, 18% moderately and 20% severely food insecure households. The ARFS total survey-weighted mean score for the whole sample (n = 804) was 32.4 (SD = 9.8). As the severity of household food insecurity increased, ARFS scores decreased. Marginally food insecure respondents reported a mean ARFS score three points lower than food-secure adults (B=-2.7; 95%CI [−5.11, −0.34]; p = 0.03), and scores reduced by six points for moderately (B=-5.6; 95%CI [−7.26, −3.90]; p<0.001) and twelve points for severely food insecure respondents (B=-11.5; 95%CI [−13.21, −9.78]; p<0.001). Marginally food insecure respondents had significantly lower vegetable sub-scale scores, moderately food insecure respondents had significantly lower sub-scale scores for all food groups except dairy, severely food insecure respondents had significantly lower scores for all sub-scale scores. Poorer diet quality is evident in adults living with any food insecurity but gets progressively worse as the severity of food insecurity increases. Interventions to reduce food insecurity and increase diet quality are required to prevent adverse nutrition-related health outcomes in food-insecure populations in Australia and beyond.

The eight well-known food security indicators were developed in 1997 using a stepwise process that involved five focus group interviews (one Māori, one Pakeha, two Pacific, and one mixed ethnicity) of 8-16 people, all of whom were either on a low income or were government beneficiaries(1). As part of the development of the tools and methods for a future New Zealand National Nutrition Survey, these eight indicators were considered for inclusion. The Māori and Technical Advisory Groups convened for the development of the National Nutrition Survey foresaw issues with the interpretation of some of the questions given the changes in the food environment and sources of food assistance in the last 25 years and recommended that cognitive testing should be conducted to see if changes were required. Participants were recruited through two community organisations, a local marae, and community Facebook pages. Participants were given the option of participating in a one-on-one interview or as part of a focus group. During each session, participants were asked five (three original and two new) questions relating to food security (running out of basics, use of food assistance, household food preparation and storage resources). After each question, the participants were asked a series of additional probing questions to ascertain whether they had interpreted the question as intended. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, and a qualitative analysis was performed on the transcripts to determine areas of concern with each question. A total of 46 participants completed the cognitive testing of the food security questions, including 26 aged 18-64 years, and 20 aged 65+ years. Participants also spanned a range of ethnicities including 8 Māori, 15 Pasifika, 15 Asian, and 8 New Zealand European or Other. Just over half of the participants (n=24) reported themselves to be financially secure, 16 participants reported that their financial security was borderline, 1 participant reported that they were not at all financially secure, and 5 participants declined to answer. Variable interpretations of terms by participants were found in all questions that were tested. Therefore, answers to the food security questions may have not reflected the actual experience of participants. This study also identified other dimensions of food security not assessed by the current eight indicators (e.g., lack of time, poor accessibility). These findings indicate that the food security questions need to be improved to ensure they are interpreted as intended and that new questions are needed that considers all dimensions of food insecurity (i.e., access, availability, utilisation, and stability). These new and amended questions should be cognitively tested in groups that are more likely to be experiencing food insecurity.

The FAO states that the term food sovereignty focuses on food for the people by placing people’s need for food at the centre of policies and insists that food is more than just a commodity. Food Sovereignty also promotes knowledge and skills by building on traditional knowledge; using research to support and pass on this knowledge to future generations; and rejecting technologies that undermine local food systems. It is essentially a movement that “recognizes that control over the food system needs to remain in the hands of producers, and is clearly focused primarily on small-scale agriculture of a non-industrial nature, preferably organic”(1). In Māori terms, Kai Sovereignty is drawn first from the relationship of foods to our needs; it is expressed through whakapapa, and has an overarching contribution to food security. Traditional foods abound in Aotearoa. The relationships are longstanding, expressive and contribute to our wellbeing in various ways(2). But the true cultural value of traditional foods is diminishing as new foods, lifestyles and experiences succeed them. Kai sovereignty therefore is at risk of being relegated to historical discourse. The FAO acknowledgement of the intergenerational role of traditional knowledge to support food sovereignty aligns well to the Māori experience. This knowledge covers a myriad of food relationships including foraging, producing, harvesting, processing, cooking and manaakitanga. We are in a renaissance period that seeks to rediscover our relationship with the pātaka, the food store. So much knowledge has been lost, but much also remains. How we draw that together in a way that acknowledges the whakapapa or historical relationship alongside the present and future. The right to achieving kai sovereignty is yet to be properly understood within our communities. The first steps lie in the knowledge space; sharing and acknowledgement of our food traditions before they are lost or misinterpreted.

Supermarkets have been described as having unprecedented and disproportionate power in the food system, influencing population diets through the products they have for sale, their price, store layouts, and other marketing activities(1).There is growing evidence to suggest that changing the retail food environment to be more health-enabling via in-store interventions is possible. The purpose of this study was to review the available high-quality evidence reporting on the effectiveness of real-world supermarket-based interventions on improving the healthiness of consumer purchases and consumption. First, a systematic search across seven electronic databases was completed in April 2023 to identify reviews describing the effects of intervention strategies that aimed to improve the healthiness of consumer purchasing in supermarkets and grocery stores (overview of reviews). The methodological quality of reviews was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Systematic Reviews for systematic and scoping reviews, and the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles for narrative reviews. Review findings were synthesised narratively. Next, high-quality, primary studies from these reviews were further inspected (review of primary studies). In-store interventions were categorised by strategy type(2), and outcome effects were coded as effective (positive/promising), ineffective or mixed/unclear(3). Results were synthesised narratively, and separately for population subgroups. Thirty-eight reviews published between 1989 and 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Most were systematic reviews (n = 29, 76%). The number of primary studies included in reviews ranged between eight and 211. Prompting (n = 19, 50%) and pricing (n = 15, 40%) were the most assessed strategy type, either alone or in combination with another strategy. From the overview of reviews, pricing strategies appeared to be the most promising at improving consumer purchasing. Twenty-three high-quality primary studies met the inclusion criteria for further review. In most studies (n = 21, 91%), the goal was to increase sales of healthy products, most commonly fruit and vegetables, or products with a higher nutritional ranking. Only two studies (9%) aimed to exclusively reduce sales of unhealthy/less healthy products. Promotion was the most assessed strategy type (n = 11, 48%), either alone or in combination with another strategy. Common promotion strategies included providing education to customers about the health benefits of selected products, offering samples of products and giving food demonstrations. From the review of primary studies, promotional strategies used in combination with another strategy appeared to be most successful in the general population, and pricing was successful in subgroups of the population, including socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, and those living in regional/remote areas. Overall, the evidence reviewed shows that the implementation of health-promoting supermarket interventions are more likely to be successful if they include a substantial pricing initiative (particularly for some subgroups), or the inclusion of promotion in combination with another strategy.

Gold kiwifruit consumption and increased vitamin C intake have been associated with improved mood, vitality, and wellbeing in healthy individuals(1,2). However, to date, no studies have focussed exclusively on the efficacy of gold kiwifruit for improving such outcomes in participants with disturbed mood. A randomised crossover trial was undertaken to examine the efficacy of ZespriTM SunGoldTM kiwifruit for improving psychological wellbeing and vitamin C concentrations in adults with sub-clinical levels of mood disturbance. In a two-period, non-blinded crossover trial, N = 26 adults aged 21 to 60 years (M = 36.1, SD = 11.0) with mild to moderate mood disturbance were randomised to a counter-balanced sequence. Participants consumed 2x SunGold kiwifruit daily or their typical diet for four weeks, with a two-week washout between periods. The primary outcome was change in mood disturbance, with secondary outcomes including plasma vitamin C, wellbeing, vitality and gut health. Results indicated a significant time x treatment interaction effect for mood disturbance (F(2,107.3) = 6.19, p = ,003) with significant improvements in mood disturbance scores between baseline and post-intervention during the SunGold kiwifruit period. A significant time x treatment interaction effect for blood plasma vitamin C (F(2,98.5) = 3.65, p = ,029) also demonstrated increased vitamin C concentrations during the SunGold kiwifruit period. A significant time x treatment interaction effect for wellbeing (F(2,104.7) = 4.5, p = ,013) was evident with wellbeing significantly improved between baseline and post-intervention during the SunGold kiwifruit period. The time x treatment interaction for vitality approached significance (F(2,104.7) = 2.89, p = ,06) with increases in vitality following SunGold kiwifruit consumption. These results provide preliminary evidence that SunGold kiwifruit consumption improves psychological wellbeing in mood-disturbed adults, which corresponds to increased plasma vitamin C concentrations. Future research is required to replicate this effect and to further demonstrate the potential benefit of whole-food interventions for treating mood-disturbance.

Hospital placement is essential training for medical interns, involving shift work and high-pressure environments. This can increase physiological and psychological stress, which may be mediated by metabolites of microbial digestion(1). Nutrients of interest include those accessible to microbial digestion and associated with altered signalling within the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA)(1). Fibre is fermented by gut microbes to produce short-chain fatty acids(2) and is associated with improved psychological outcomes(3). Tryptophan, a precursor to gut-derived serotonin(2), has been negatively associated with anxiety(4). Processed foods contain food additives, excess sugars, and saturated fats that may disrupt gut homeostasis(1) and impact psychological well-being(4). Lastly, total energy intake may determine the level of substrate available for microbial fermentation(2). Therefore, this research explores how microbiota-accessible food components interact with physical and psychological well-being in a cohort of medical interns undertaking their first-year of hospital placement. Participants were healthy medical interns, during first-year hospital placement (n = 21) from the Hunter New England Local Health District, NSW, Australia. Participants completed diet and wellbeing surveys at baseline and every 2 months over a 10-month period. 24-hour diet diaries were self-recorded from participants using a mobile application (Easy Diet Diary) and analysed using AusNut and the NOVA classification system of ultra-processed foods (ULP). Wellbeing surveys include depression, anxiety, stress scale (DASS), and PROMIS survey for mental (M), physical (P), and sleep well-being. Current data represents an ‘in-progress’ of the longitudinal data collection. This study utilised Spearman correlation and Tukey’s post hoc test for mixed methods analysis. From baseline to timepoint 3 (T3, 4 months) daily energy intake was consistent with cohort estimated energy requirements (EER). However, consumption ranged from 37% to 167% of EER, indicating a large variation of intakes. Energy consumed from ULP ranged from 30% to 34% (p = 0.6875). Baseline tryptophan intake (x¯ = 1139mg) was within the suggested target, whilst fibre intake (x¯ = 23g) was below the recommended intake. Neither saw significant changes from baseline to T3. Fibre intake was positively correlated with mental and physical well-being at baseline (x¯ = 23.1g, M: r = 0.474, p = 0.04, P: r = 0.608, p = 0.007), and timepoint 2 (x¯ = 31.5g, M: r = 0.647,p = 0.026, P: r = 0.780, p = 0.004) but not at T3. In addition, baseline consumption of sugar (x¯ = 18g) and poly-unsaturated fats (x¯ = 15g) were both negatively correlated with mental and physical well-being. Overall, no significant dietary changes were evident from baseline to mid-year collection in a first-year medical intern cohort during hospital placements. Fibre was significantly associated with mental and physical well-being, building on current understanding of fibre’s role in the MGBA. Planned metabolite analysis will explore the mechanisms of proposed microbiome-accessible nutrients alongside diet, well-being, and microbiota data. Findings from this study will identify how diet-microbiome interactions change under stress, with wider positive implications on intense workplace environments with the aim to preserve individual wellbeing.

Minerals and trace elements are essential for human health and wellness. Fruits can be an important dietary source of these micronutrients. For centuries, native Australian fruits have been a vital source of nutrition and well-being for the Indigenous Communities(1). However, comprehensive information on the mineral and trace element composition of these native fruits, including broad-leaved Geebung (Persoonia stradbrokensis), is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the mineral and trace element composition of broad-leaved Geebung, an important but still underutilised native Australian fruit, at different maturity stages. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) were used to analyse the fruit. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and the means (n = 3) were compared by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test with p < 0.05 as significant. Calcium and potassium could be identified as the main minerals, and iron, zinc and manganese as the main trace elements. The calcium content in broad-leaved Geebung was lower than Australian desert lime, kakadu plum, and riberry, respectively (35.7-271.5 vs. 384.2 vs. 282.5 vs. 307.7 mg/100g dry weight (DW))(2). Potassium has a vital role in the prevention of bone loss and is essential for the heart, kidney, and blood pressure. The potassium content of broad-leaved Geebung fruit was lower than Australian desert lime, kakadu plum, lemon aspen, quandong and riberry (average 516.4 vs. 1287.8 vs. 1905.5 vs. 1512.9 vs. 3456.2 vs. 1715.7 mg/100g DW)(2), which contributes to approximately 15% recommended dietary allowance (RDA). Iron is the main element in the production of hemoglobin and is important for maintaining healthy blood. Iron content in the fruit ranged from 0.8-2.6 mg/100g DW, which was higher than that of Davidson’s plum (1.2 mg/100g DW), but lower than the Green Plum, Australian desert lime, and kakadu plum (3.8 vs. 4.7 vs. 4.0 mg/100g DW) (2,3). Besides, the manganese levels were relatively high in broad-leaved Geebung fruit and considerably higher than in other native Australian fruits such as Kakadu plums, Desert limes and Quandongs (11.2-26.4 vs. 3.5 vs. 0.9 vs. 0.3 mg/100 g DW)(2). Interestingly, the mineral and trace element content decreased (p < 0.05) during fruit maturity. In general, broad-leaved Geebung fruit can provide considerable amounts of essential minerals and trace elements and its potential as a healthy “snack” alternative should be investigated further.

Nut consumption in Australia does not meet recommended levels, and concern regarding the impact of nuts on body weight is a reported barrier to regular intake, due to their high energy content(1). Nut intake is not associated with higher body weight(2), which may be explained by their lower metabolisable energy(3). Hence, total energy intake may be overestimated among nut consumers. Nut consumption patterns in Australia are also unknown. This study aimed to describe the metabolisable energy from nuts, and nut consumption patterns of the Australian population. A previously developed nut-specific database was expanded to include the metabolisable energy of nuts based on nut type and form, and applied to the 2011-12 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (NNPAS). Mean metabolisable energy was compared to mean energy intake determined using Atwater factors for nut consumers. Additionally, nut consumption patterns were also explored, including the proportion of nuts consumed at meals and snacks, proportion of nuts consumed alone or combined with other foods, and timing of nut intake. Among nut consumers, the mean metabolisable energy from nuts, based only on nut type, was 241.24 (95% CI: 232.00, 250.49) kJ/day. The mean metabolisable energy when considering both nut type and form was 260.69 (95% CI: 250.18, 271.21) kJ/day, while energy from nuts using Atwater factors was 317.60 (95% CI: 304.85, 330.35) kJ/day. Nuts were more likely to be consumed as snacks, with approximately 63% of all nut intake (in grams) occurring as a snack. Nuts were frequently consumed with other foods and beverages, with only 27% of nuts consumed alone or with plain water. Furthermore, nuts were most often consumed after midday (68% of intake) rather than in the morning (32% of intake). Application of metabolisable energy data to the 2011-12 NNPAS has a significant impact on the calculation of energy intake from nuts. Nut consumption patterns identify most nut consumption occurring as snacks and two-thirds of nut intake occurring in the afternoon and evening. These findings may inform strategies to promote nut consumption in Australia.

It is estimated that one-quarter of the world’s population has Metabolic Syndrome (MS)(1), a key driver of growth in healthcare expenditure. Traditional approaches to treating MS through the application of standard dietary recommendations and caloric restriction have had limited success. More recent evidence suggests that novel, anti-inflammatory approaches such as replacing refined carbohydrates and ultra-processed food with unprocessed or minimally processed, lower carbohydrate foods and adapting meal timing and frequency may be more effective(2). The aim of the study was twofold: 1) To determine the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory dietary strategies for long-term weight loss and improvement in metabolic health and 2) To examine the relationships between eating behaviours and long-term weight loss. Twelve-month audit data from a UK based 12-week lifestyle program that focuses the principles of consuming an anti-inflammatory diet was analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA to examine the effects of the program on changes in weight and waist circumference. A quantitative, survey-based research design was used to retrospectively identify relationships between eating behaviours and both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory dietary patterns. Multivariate regression using stepwise method was used to examine differences in weight change based on eating patterns and behaviours. Six hundred and forty-two (N = 642) participants (age = 50.4 ± 12.5 years, female 63.6%, weight = 96.1 kg ± 22.1, BMI 35.2 kg/m2 ± 7.5) demonstrated a weight loss average of 4.49 kg ± 3.78 post-lifestyle program (12 weeks). Survey respondents (N = 64) reported a maximum long term weight loss of 13.9 kg ± 11.9. Weight loss and percentage weight loss after the program was significantly predicted by daily consumption of sweet drinks and grain-based foods. The model predicted one unit increase in daily serving consumption of these foods resulted in less weight lost [2.3 kg (4.5%)]. Seventy one percent of survey respondents had maintained most or all their weight loss for more than 6 months. The model predicted change in consumption of grain-based foods, TFEQ-emotional eating score, consumption of savoury ultra-processed foods, and following an alternative dietary approach after the program were statistically significant in predicting weight loss maintenance (R2 = 0.803, F(4, 20) = 20.376, p < 0.001). The preliminary findings suggest that anti-inflammatory dietary approaches are effective and sustainable for weight loss. Eating behaviour may both support and hinder long term changes in eating patterns and whilst there are significant relationships between eating behaviour and eating patterns, the extent to which dietary patterns drive eating behaviour remains unclear.

Chronic pain affects 20-30% of people worldwide(1). While the impact of nutrition and dietary patterns on bodily pain has gained attention in recent years, the underlying linking mechanisms remain poorly understood; it is possible that body weight, specifically adiposity, may be a mediating factor(2). Thus, the primary aim of this study was to explore whether adiposity mediates the relationship between diet quality and bodily pain. This cross-sectional analysis included 654 adults (57% women, mean age 50.4 ± 1.1 years, BMI 29.0 ± 6.2 kg/m2) with complete diet, adiposity, and pain measures from the Whyalla Intergenerational Study of Health (2008-09). Diet quality was calculated using the Dietary Guideline Index (DGI total score, core and non-core scores)(3), and pain assessed via the Short Form-36 bodily pain scale (SF36-BPS) transformed percent score. Adiposity was determined from body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and body fat percent (BF, via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry). Mediation analyses determined the role of adiposity in the direct and indirect relationships between diet quality and pain in the whole population, then stratified by sex (self-report). There were no significant indirect or direct effects between DGI total scores and SF36-BPS, for any measure of adiposity. Direct effects were observed for DGI core-food scores on SF36-BPS for each measure of adiposity (BMI, β = 0.258, 95% CI 0.048, 0.467; WC β = 0.246, 95% CI 0.037, 0.455; BF β = 0.247, 95% CI 0.040, 0.454; all p<0.05). Each measure of adiposity accounted for <10% of the relationship between diet quality and pain, with a better-quality diet associated with less bodily pain (higher SF36-BPS). Relationships differed by sex; with no direct or indirect effects seen between DGI scores and SF36-BPS for men while, in women, there was non-mediation with direct positive effects between DGI total score and SF36-BPS for each measure of adiposity (BMI, β = 0.362, 95% CI 0.132, 0.591; WC β = 0.345, 95% CI 0.116, 0.574; BF β = 0.357, 95% CI 0.130, 0.584; all p<0.05). Also in women, body fat mediated 85% of the relationship between DGI non-core scores on bodily pain (indirect effect β=-0.242, 95% CI −0.358, −0.126, p <0.05). While adiposity did not mediate the relationship between diet quality and pain, this study highlights that diet quality plays a role in the pain experience with higher consumption of core foods showing direct associations with lower levels of bodily pain. Moreover, sex differences were observed, with less bodily pain in women associated with higher overall diet quality. Interestingly, body fat drove the relationship between higher pain scores and greater consumption of non-core foods (discretionary), but body fat alone was associated with consumption of fewer discretionary foods. This anomaly requires further investigation.

Evidence suggests that low carbohydrate eating patterns are effective for rapid weight loss 1, however, little is known about their long-term effects on the risk of chronic diseases. We assessed the association of a low carbohydrate diet score (LCD) with the incidence of type 2 diabetes using Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) data. Between 1990 and 1994, the MCCS recruited 41,513 people aged 40 to 69 years. The first and second follow-ups were conducted in 1994-1998 and 2003-2007, respectively2. We analysed data from 39,185 participants. LCD at baseline was calculated as the percentage of energy from carbohydrate, fat, and protein. The higher the score the less carbohydrate contributed to energy intake. The association of LCD quintiles with the incidence of diabetes was assessed using modified Poisson regression, adjusted for lifestyle, obesity, socioeconomic and other confounders. LCD was positively associated with diabetes risk. Higher LCD score (p for trend = 0.001) was associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Quintile 5 (38% energy from carbohydrates) versus quintile 1 (55% energy from carbohydrates) showed a 20% increased diabetes risk (incidence risk ratio (IRR) = 1.20 (95% CI: 1.05-1.37)). A further adjustment for BMI and WHR eliminated the association. Mediation analysis demonstrated that BMI attributed 76% of the LCD & diabetes association. Consuming a low carbohydrate diet, reflected as a high LCD score, may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes which is largely explained by obesity. Results imply the need for further studies, including clinical trials investigating the effects of a low carbohydrate diet in type 2 diabetes.

Childhood obesity has been a public health concern worldwide(1). Parents are a crucial part of the weight monitoring of children(2). But effects of parental perception of children’s weight on children’s weight change remain inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects. A systematic search of six databases was conducted from inception to March 2023 based on Cochrane guidelines. Longitudinal studies were included. Data were synthesised using a semi-quantitative approach and meta-analysis. Finally, nine studies with a total of 25,475 respondents were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that compared to children perceived as normal weight, children who were perceived as overweight or obese by their parents had a statistically significantly greater weight gain (pooled coefficient β = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1, 0.76, p<0.05) during follow-up. Conversely, children perceived as underweight presented less weight gain (β=-0.16, 95%CI: −0.3,-0.02, p<0.05) during follow-up compared to children perceived as normal weight. However, parental misperception of their children’s weight was not statistically significantly associated with children’s weight change (underestimation: β = 0.04, 95% CI:-0.37, 0.44, p>0.05; overestimation: β=-0.09, 95% CI:-0.06, 0.23, p>0.05). We found that parental perception of children’s weight, not parental misperception, might influence children’s subsequent weight change. Longitudinal and intervention studies using validated measurements and including potential confounders and mediators are needed to confirm the causalities.

Utilising local and traditional foods in schools presents a significant opportunity within our region to ensure food and nutritional security, support local livelihoods by driving markets and employment opportunities, increasing food literacy, and help students to understand the role of, and develop a preference for these foods. School meals programs (SMP) are increasingly touted as a strategy for food system transformation(1), however, are not widely used in the Pacific Islands(2). Yet, there is increasing interest and momentum towards understanding school food and nutrition environments and the use of SMP in this region, especially with models that support and promote the integration of local, traditional climate-resilient, nutrient rich foods. When a large scale SMP may not be possible, other school food and nutrition activities can be utilised to support nutritious food choice. Evidence collected over the last five years provides information on the current situation, activities, and capacity for providing food in schools across the Pacific Islands (2,3,4). Activities across the region vary from national SMP to gardening programs, nutrition education, providing canteens/tuckshops and other ad hoc activities, for example events for World Food Day. Some activities have a requirement for the use of local food, while some prioritise local foods in gardening programs and work with local farmers. Recently it has been shown that youth are exposed to, and have access to significant amounts of ultra-processed foods (UPF) around schools(3). Mapping of the foods available to students within a 400m radius of 88 schools in Fiji found that sugar sweetened beverages were available in 80%, and lollies/confectionary in just over 60% of outlets. Fresh fruit was available in just over 20% of outlets, while fresh vegetables were available in less than 20% of outlets(3). While there are many challenges to providing local, traditional, nutritious foods in schools, including access to financial, human, and physical resources, stakeholders have told us that one of the most significant is how modernisation and colonisation of food systems have resulted in a preference for hyperpalatable UPF and how this makes it more challenging to incorporate local produce in a way that is accepted by students. This provides an opportunity to further explore and share ways to integrate local, traditional, climate-resilient, nutrient rich foods in schools to support children and adolescents to value, utilise, prefer, and advocate for these foods. There is a need to support the utilisation of traditional, local foods in schools by advocating for policy (at various levels, right from a school level upwards) that drives the use of these foods and creates more supportive school food environments.