To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 5 examines the craft industry in the capital core, as well as state-run workshops attached in the core region, to shed light on the mass production and distribution of military supplies and key commodities, such as iron farming implements and ceramics. These lines of evidence provide a framework to illustrate the economic foundation of the imperial state and imperial regimes of value.
Chapter 6 explores the craft industries for both prestige items (silk, lacquerware, bronze) and mundane commodities goods (iron and ceramics) in peripheries. This chapter suggests that the circulation of Han-style commodities constituted a new commercial network of intertwined state- and privately run workshops. A “biography of objects” approach employed in this chapter also illustrates how interpersonal relationships and social lives of imperial subjects were shaped by participation as consumers.
Chapter 2 compares patterns of population growth and settlement organization of the Ordos and Lingnan – two frontier regions – in a diachronic framework to argue for the transformation of frontier zones into extended networks and bounded territories in the middle Western Han. The Great Wall is reprised as a spatial infrastructure that is central to understanding Han imperialism as both an economic enterprise and a form of settler colonialism.
This chapter outlines a key debate in the study of the Han Empire that is currently represented by proponents of a “fictive” versus “realist” view of empire building in early China. It makes a case for the book’s archaeological approach, namely the potential for recently excavated materials to trace the emergence of a constellation of universal ideas about imperialism, cultural unity, and sovereignty in China. These ideas will be examined along four domains of Han sociopolitical life – Part i Imperial Geography, Part ii Agriculture and Foodways, Part iii Craft Industries, and Part iv Ritual – as documented in core and frontier regions.
Chapter 3 looks at the relationship between the state and its imperial subjects through the politics of food production in the core. Pairing historical sources with the archaeology of spatial infrastructures (i.e., granaries and irrigation systems), this chapter evaluates how the state’s active involvement in intensifying crop production also led to the development of new techniques for transforming fields and imperial subjects into legible units.
Chapter 8 expands on funerary practices of Yue/Viet, Qiang, and “Xiongnu” subjects and asks how and why ritual conversion, which underlines the assimilationist campaign of jiaohua, was carried out. Through a comparison of tombs belonging to indigenous and Central Plains diasporic groups, this chapter argues that cultural boundaries dividing the Han/non-Han or Huaxia/ non-Huaxia world were magnified by differences in the presentation of the deceased’s physical body along ethnic and gender norms.
Chapter 7 examines changes in religious ideas about the soul and the afterlife among the aristocracy, elites, and non-elites. By reintegrating craft goods back into their tomb context, this chapter evaluates how, on the one hand, properly mourning the dead came to define a new moral vanguard, and on the other, also led to the creative manipulation of class boundaries through individual conspicuous displays of mourning.
Chapter 4 explores how state power managed crop production in various peripheral zones as a process of assimilation. Through the examination of archaeobotanical remains and farming practices on the frontier, this chapter shows that the transfer of intensive farming regimes and new foodways was a contingent and variable phenomenon, in part due to differences in local customs and ecologies.
Chapter 1 draws on settlement archaeology, urban infrastructures, and architecture to evaluate the hypothesis that Chang’an was an unprecedented imperial capital at the apex of the junxian system. Also subject to appraisal is the role of interregional networks and urban nodes in the spatial reworking of contentious territories into the constitution of an imperial core.