Section 2 - Tools and Methodologies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Research Methods in Mental HealthA Comprehensive Guide, pp. 81 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
References
Lewis, G, David, A, Andreasson, S, Allebeck, P. Schizophrenia and city life. Lancet 1992; 340: 137–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalman, C, Thomas, HV, David, AS, et al. Signs of asphyxia at birth and risk of schizophrenia. Population-based case-control study. British Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 179: 403–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ching, RK, Hibar, DP, Gurholt, TP, et al. What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Human Brain Mapping 2022; 43: 56–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amen, DG, Raji, CA, Willeumier, K, et al. Functional neuroimaging distinguishes posttraumatic stress disorder from traumatic brain injury in focused and large community datasets. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0129659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, L. Exploring human genomic diversity with gnomAD. Nature Reviews Genetics 2020; 21: 448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGregor, I, John, A, Lloyd, K. Psychiatric research platform within SAIL: linkage of prospectively ascertained phenotypically rich and genetic data to routinely collected anonymised records. International Journal of Population Data Science 2017; 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, CK, Hayes, RD, Broadbent, MTM, et al. A cohort study on mental disorders, stage of cancer at diagnosis and subsequent survival. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, R, Chesney, E, Cullen, A, et al. Clinical outcomes and mortality associated with weekend admission to psychiatric hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry 2016; 209: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolliakou, A, Bakolis, I, Chandran, D, et al. Mental health-related conversations on social media and crisis episodes: a time-series regression analysis. Scientific Reports 2020; 10: 1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jankovic, J, Parsons, J, Jovanović, N, et al. Differences in access and utilisation of mental health services in the perinatal period for women from ethnic minorities: a population-based study. BMC Medicine 2020; 18: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, M, Shine, L, John, A, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes for older people with dementia prescribed antipsychotic medication: a population based e-cohort study. Neurology and Therapy 2017; 6: 57–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, J, Akbari, A, Agrawal, U, et al. Protocol for the development of the Wales Multimorbidity e-Cohort (WMC): data sources and methods to construct a population-based research platform to investigate multimorbidity. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e047101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tulloch, JS, Beadsworth, MB, Vivancos, R, et al. GP coding behaviour for non-specific clinical presentations: a pilot study. BJGP Open 2020; 4: bjgpopen20X101050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, B, Eastham, R, Brown, B, Fitton, R, Dickinson, D. Primary care patient records in the United Kingdom: past, present, and future research priorities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018; 20: e11293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, A, McGregor, J, Jones, I, et al. Premature mortality among people with severe mental illness – new evidence from linked primary care data. Schizophrenia Research 2018; 199: 154–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mykletun, A, Overland, S, Dahl, AA, et al. A population-based cohort study of the effect of common mental disorders on disability pension awards. American Journal of Psychiatry 2006; 163: 1412–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, R, Fosså, S, Hotopf, M, Mykletun, A. Extent of disease at first cancer presentation and previous anxiety and depressive symptoms: the HUNT Study data linkage. British Journal of Psychiatry 2020; 217: 427–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera, G, Khondoker, M, Broadbent, M, Breen, G, Stewart, R. Factors associated with response to acetylcholinesterase inhibition in dementia: a cohort study from a secondary mental health case register in London. PLoS One 2014; 9: e109484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S, Mueller, C, Stewart, R, et al. Predictors of falls and fractures leading to hospitalisation in people with dementia: a representative cohort study. JAMDA 2018; 19: 607–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Sleeman, KE, Perera, G, Stewart, R, Higginson, IJ. Predictors of emergency department attendance by people with dementia in their last year of life: retrospective cohort study using linked clinical and administrative data. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2018; 14: 20–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perera, G, Rijnbeek, PR, Alexander, M, et al. Vascular and metabolic risk factor differences prior to dementia diagnosis: a multi-database case control study using European electronic health records. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e038753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickersham, A, Dickson, H, Jones, R, et al. Trajectories of educational attainment among children and adolescents diagnosed with depression, and the role of sociodemographic characteristics: a longitudinal, data linkage study. British Journal of Psychiatry 2021; 218: 151–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, A, Friedmann, Y, Del Pozo-Banos, M, et al. Association of school absence and exclusion with recorded neurodevelopmental disorders, mental disorders, or self-harm: a nationwide, retrospective, electronic cohort study of children and young people in Wales, UK. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, LJ, McGregor, J, Pouliou, T, et al. Anxiety and depression among children and young people involved in family justice court proceedings: Longitudinal national data linkage study. BJPsych Open 2022; 8: E47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, A, McGregor, J, Fone, D, et al. Case-finding for common mental disorders of anxiety and depression in primary care: an external validation of routinely collected data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2016; 16: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, RD, Chang, CK, Fernandes, A, et al. Associations between symptoms and all-cause mortality in individuals with serious mental illness. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2012; 72: 114–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rucker, J, Newman, S, Gray, J, et al. OPCRIT+: and electronic system for psychiatric diagnosis and data collection in clinical and research settings. British Journal of Psychiatry 2011; 199: 151–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khapre, S, Stewart, R, Taylor, C. An evaluation of symptom domains in the 2 years before pregnancy as predictors of relapse in the perinatal period in women with severe mental illness. European Psychiatry 2021; 64: e26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parmar, M, Ma, R, Attygalle, S, et al. Associations between loneliness and acute hospitalisation outcomes among patients receiving mental healthcare in South London: a retrospective cohort study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2021; 57: 397–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, R, Wilson, R, Jackson, R, et al. Association of cannabis use with hospital admission and antipsychotic treatment failure in first episode psychosis: an observational study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e009888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botelle, R, Bhavsar, V, Kadra-Scalzo, G, et al. Can natural language processing models extract and classify instances of interpersonal violence in mental healthcare electronic records: an applied evaluative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e052911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jewell, A, Pritchard, M, Barrett, K, et al. The Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) data linkage service user and carer advisory group: creating and sustaining a successful patient and public involvement group to guide research in a complex area. BMC Research Involvement and Engagement 2019; 5: 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldacre, B, Morley, J (2022). Better, broader, safer: using health data for research and analysis. A review commissioned by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. Department of Health and Social Care, London, UK.Google Scholar
References
Purna Singh, A, Shahapur, PR, Vadakedath, S, et al. Research question, objectives, and endpoints in clinical and oncological research: a comprehensive review. Cureus [Internet]. 2022 Sep 25. www.cureus.com/articles/113292-research-question-objectives-and-endpoints-in-clinical-and-oncological-research-a-comprehensive-reviewGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saldanha, IJ, Skelly, AC, Ley, KV, et al. Inclusion of nonrandomized studies of interventions in systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness: an update [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022. (AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care). www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK584467/CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeni, CP, Tramontina, S, Ketzer, CR, Pheula, GF, Rohde, LA. Methylphenidate combined with aripiprazole in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized crossover trial. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2009;19(5):553–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grenyer, BFS, Lewis, KL, Fanaian, M, Kotze, B. Treatment of personality disorder using a whole of service stepped care approach: a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2018;13(11):e0206472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qurashi, I, Chaudhry, IB, Khoso, AB, et al. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids added to treatment as usual for at risk mental states: the NAYAB study. Brain Behav Immun 2024;115:609–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RECOVERY Collaborative Group, Horby, P, Lim, WS, Emberson, JR, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021;384(8):693–704.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, JJH, Harari, O, Dron, L, et al. An overview of platform trials with a checklist for clinical readers. J Clin Epidemiol 2020;125:1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, JJH, Hsu, G, Siden, EG, Thorlund, K, Mills, EJ. An overview of precision oncology basket and umbrella trials for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70(2):125–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Hutton, P, Kelly, J, Taylor, CDJ, et al. Correction: Accelerating the development of a psychological intervention to restore treatment decision‑making capacity in patients with schizophrenia‑spectrum disorder: a study protocol for a multi‑site, assessor‑blinded, pilot Umbrella trial (the DEC:IDES trial). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023;9(1):142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huckvale, K, Hoon, L, Stech, E, et al. Protocol for a bandit-based response adaptive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of brief self-guided digital interventions for reducing psychological distress in university students: the Vibe Up study. BMJ Open 2023;13(4):e066249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallmann, P, Bedding, AW, Choodari-Oskooei, B, et al. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them. BMC Med 2018;16(1):29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddinott, P, Pollock, A, O’Cathain, A, et al. How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Research 2018;7:752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein Tuente, S, Bogaerts, S, Bulten, E, et al. Virtual Reality Aggression Prevention Therapy (VRAPT) versus waiting list control for forensic psychiatric inpatients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med 2020;9(7):2258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetter, TR, Mascha, EJ. Defining the primary outcomes and justifying secondary outcomes of a study: usually, the fewer, the better. Anesth Analg 2017;125(2):678–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalfen, A, Wasserman, L, Benipal, PK, et al. Virtual psychiatric care for perinatal depression (Virtual-PND): a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord Rep 2021;4:100085.Google Scholar
Carlyle, D, Green, R, Inder, M, et al. A randomized-controlled trial of mentalization-based treatment compared with structured case management for borderline personality disorder in a mainstream public health service. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:561916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capacity, Biros M., Vulnerability, and informed consent for research. J Law Med Ethics J Am Soc Law Med Ethics 2018;46(1):72–8.Google Scholar
Sterne, JAC, White, IR, Carlin, JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009;338:b2393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Research. How to disseminate your research [Internet]. National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2019. https://arc-swp.nihr.ac.uk/uploads/attachments/NIHR%20Dissemination%20Guidance.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Research. Guidance on applying for feasibility studies [Internet]. 2021. Available from:www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/nihr-research-for-patient-benefit-rfpb-programme-guidance-on-applying-for-feasibility-studies/20474Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Research. The Clinical Trials Toolkit [Internet]. Available from: www.ct-toolkit.ac.uk/Google Scholar
Skivington, K, Matthews, L, Simpson, SA, et al. Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl 2021;25(57):1–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosall, NK, Gosall, GS. The doctors’ guide to critical appraisal. 5th ed. Knutsford: Pastest; 2020. 324 pp.Google Scholar
References
Michell, J. Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. Br J Psychol 1997; 88[3]: 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michell, J. Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. Br J Psychol 1997; 88[3]: 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tafreshi, D, Slaney, KL, Neufeld, SD. Quantification in psychology: critical analysis of an unreflective practice. J Theor Philos Psychol 2016; 36[4]: 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michell, J. Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. Br J Psychol 1997; 88[3]: 355–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaney, KL. Validating psychological constructs: historical, philosophical, and practical dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, PE. Clinical versus statistical prediction: a theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. University of Minnesota Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Grove, WM, Zald, DH, Lebow, BS, Snitz, BE, Nelson, C. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Psychol Assess 2000; 12[1]: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, LJ, Meehl, PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 1955; 52[4]: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayearst, LE, Bagby, RM. Evaluating the psychometric properties of psychological measures. In: Handbook of assessment and treatment planning for psychological disorders. 3rd ed [eds Antony, MM, Barlow, DH ]: Ch. 2. The Guilford Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Sijtsma, K. On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika 2009; 74[1]: 107–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrout, PE, Fleiss, JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86[2]: 420–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, C, Pistrang, N, Elliott, R. Research methods in clinical psychology: an introduction for students and practitioners. 2nd ed. Wiley, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breakwell, GM, Smith, JA, Wright, DB, eds. Research methods in psychology. 4th ed. Sage, 2012.Google Scholar
Haynes, SN, Smith, G, Hunsley, J. Scientific foundations of clinical assessment. Routledge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, TD, Campbell, DT. Quasi-experimentation: design & analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin, 1979.Google Scholar
Flake, JK, Fried, EI. Measurement schmeasurement: questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci 2020; 3[4]: 456–65.Google Scholar
Slaney, KL. Validating psychological constructs: historical, philosophical, and practical dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. P51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. Validity. In Educational measurement. 3rd ed [ed Linn, RL]: Ch. 2. American Council on Education, 1989.Google Scholar
Messick, S. Test validity: a matter of consequence. Soc Indic Res 1998; 45[1]: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, 2014. www.testingstandards.net/uploads/7/6/6/4/76643089/standards_2014edition.pdfGoogle Scholar
Borsboom, D, Mellenbergh, GJ, van Heerden, J. The concept of validity. Psychol Rev 2004; 111[4]: 1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16[9]: 606–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM–V. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association, 2013.Google Scholar
Lawshe, CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975; 28[4]: 563–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Owen, SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30[4]: 459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K, Trevena, L, Waters, D. Content validation of the evidence-based nursing practice assessment tool. Nurse Res 2018; 26[1]: 33–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynn, MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986; 35[6]: 382–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunsley, J, Allan, T. Psychometrics and psychological assessment. In The cambridge handbook of clinical assessment and diagnosis [eds Sellbom, M, JA Suhr]: Ch. 2. Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychol Bull 1954; 51[2, Pt.2]: 15.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D. The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika 2006; 71[3]: 425–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, DT, Fiske, DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959; 56[2]: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noar, SM. The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 2003; 10[4]: 622–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association, APA Task Force on Psychological Assessment and Evaluation Guidelines. APA guidelines for psychological assessment and evaluation. American Psychological Association, 2020. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-psychological-assessment-evaluation.pdf.Google Scholar
Coaley, K. An introduction to psychological assessment & psychometrics. 2nd ed. Sage, 2014.Google Scholar
Butcher, JN, Dahlstrom, WG, Graham, JR, Tellegen, A, Kaemmer, B. Manual for the restandardised Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An administrative and interpretive guide.University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Amoretti, MC, Lalumera, E, Serpico, D. The DSM-5 introduction of the Social [Pragmatic] Communication Disorder as a new mental disorder: a philosophical review. Hist Philos Life Sci 2021; 43[4]: 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, LJ, ed. The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalisability for scores and profiles. John Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
Monteiro, S, Sullivan, GM, Chan, TM. Generalisability theory made simple[r]: an introductory primer to G-studies. J Grad Med Educ 2019; 11[4]: 365–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medvedev, ON, Berk, M, Dean, OM, et al. A novel way to quantify schizophrenia symptoms in clinical trials. Eur J Clin Invest 2021; 51[3]: e13398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, FM, Novick, MR. Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Rust, J, Kosinski, M, Stillwell, D. Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. 4th ed. Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Embretson, SE, Hershberger, SL, eds. The new rules of measurement: what every psychologist and educator should know. Psychology Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, SN, Keawe’aimoku Kaholokula, J, Tanaka-Matsumi, J. Psychometric foundations of psychological assessment with diverse cultures: what are the concepts, methods, and evidence? In Cultural competence in applied psychology: an evaluation of current status and future directions [eds Frisby, CL, WT O’Donohue]: Ch. 18. Springer International Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
Rust, J, Golombok, S. Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Wade, DL. Racial discrimination in IQ testing – Larry P v. Riles. DePaul Law Rev 1980; 29[4]: 1193–214.Google Scholar
Davidov, E, Meuleman, B, Cieciuch, J, Schmidt, P, Billiet, J. Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annu Rev Sociol 2014; 40[1]: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnick, DL, Bornstein, MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev 2016; 41: 71–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenberg, RJ, Lance, CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organisational research. Organ Res Methods 2000; 3[1]: 4–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, DJ. A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychol Methods 2017; 22[3]: 507–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, CM, Aronson, J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 69[5]: 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, H, Dollaghan, C. Applying item response theory modeling to identify social [pragmatic] communication disorder. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2020; 63[6]: 1916–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Business Innovation and Skills. The 2011 Skills for Life Survey: a survey of literacy, numeracy and ICT levels in England, BIS/12/P168. Department for Business Innovation and Skills, 2012. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/attachment_data/file/36000/12-p168-2011-skills-for-life-survey.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cuffe, R. A readability analysis of the PHQ-9: how much of the general public may struggle to understand it? Clin Psychol Forum 2021; 347: 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, RK, Behar, E. Readability of self-report measures of depression and anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009; 77[6]: 1100–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sentell, TL, Shumway, MA. Low literacy and mental illness in a nationally representative sample. J Nerv Ment Dis 2003; 191[8]: 549–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boateng, GO, Neilands, TB, Frongillo, EA, Melgar-Quiñonez, HR, Young, SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health 2018; 6: 149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenthal, KM, Lewis, CA. An introduction to psychological tests and scales. 3rd ed. Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Streiner, DL, Norman, GR, Cairney, J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
British Psychological Society. Psychological testing: a test user’s guide. The British Psychological Society: Psychological Testing Centre, 2017. https://ptc.bps.org.uk/sites/ptc.bps.org.uk/files/guidance_documents/ptc02_test_users_guide_2017_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hunsley, J, Mash, EJ, eds. A guide to assessments that work. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antony, MM, Barlow, DH, eds. Handbook of assessment and treatment planning for psychological disorders. 3rd ed. Guilford Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M, Suhr, JA, eds. The Cambridge handbook of clinical assessment and diagnosis. Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. List of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry [Internet]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_diagnostic_classification_and_rating_scales_used_in_psychiatryGoogle Scholar
References
Feyaerts, J., Kusters, W., Van Duppen, Z., et al. (2021). Uncovering the realities of delusional experience in schizophrenia: a qualitative phenomenological study in Belgium. Lancet Psychiatry, 8(9), 784–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00196-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, B., Vetere, A., & Davis, P. (2020). Understanding addiction, relapse and recovery amongst substance using offenders – a qualitative study informed by developmental psychological theories. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 20(4), 337–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-04-2020-0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, V., McCombie, C., Nikolakopoulos, G., & Morgan, C. (2021). Ethnicity and power in the mental health system: experiences of white British and black Caribbean people with psychosis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 30, e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796020001043CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Lancet, P. (2019). Deeper understanding. Lancet Psychiatry, 6(9), 713. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30304-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conserv Biol, 28(5), 1167–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holden, M., & Lynch, P. (2004). Choosing the appropriate methodology: understanding research philosophy. The Marketing Review – Market Rev, 4. https://doi.org/10.1362/1469347042772428Google Scholar
Pilgrim, D. (2014). Some implications of critical realism for mental health research. Social Theory & Health, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.B. (2019). Qualitative research framework: integrating philosophical and methodological assumptions. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion. DOI: 10.7176/jpcr/40-01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiller, J. (2016). Epistemological foundations of objectivist and interpretivist research. In Books and Book Chapters by University of Dayton Faculty. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/books/52Google Scholar
Blackman, K.M. a. D. (2017). A guide to ontology, epistemology, and philosophical perspectives for interdisciplinary researchers. https://i2insights.org/2017/05/02/philosophy-for-interdisciplinarity/Google Scholar
Feast, L., & Melles, G. (2010). Epistemological positions in design research: a brief review of the literature. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Design Education (connected 2010), 28 June–01 July.Google Scholar
Staller, K.M. (2012). Epistemological boot camp: the politics of science and what every qualitative researcher needs to know to survive in the academy. Qualitative Social Work, 12(4), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325012450483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambra, C., Riordan, R., Ford, J., & Matthews, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health, 74(11), 964–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collyer, F., & White, K. (2011). The privatisation of Medicare and the National Health Service, and the global marketisation of healthcare systems. Health Sociol Rev, 20(3), 238–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2011.11003086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannella, G. (2015). Qualitative research as living within/transforming complex power relations. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 594–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414554907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somekh, B., & Lewin, C. (2005). Research methods in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: real or imagined. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol, 53(8), 765–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cargo, M., & Mercer, S.L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health, 29, 325–50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, C., & Frisby, W. (2008). Continuing the journey: articulating dimensions of feminist participatory action research. In Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934.d12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varcoe, C. (2006). Doing participatory action research in a racist world. West J Nurs Res, 28(5), 525–40; discussion 561–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945906287706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jannesari, S. (2022). Exploring the challenges of working with migrants, migrant organisations and migrant communities: an ethnography of participatory action research projects. New Sociological Perspectives, 2(2).Google Scholar
Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: theory, research and method. Pearson.Google Scholar
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2012). Interpretative phenomenological analysis theory, method and research (1st ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Golsworthy, R., & Coyle, A. (2001). Practitioners’ accounts of religious and spiritual dimension in bereavement therapy. Counsell Psychol Quart, 14(3), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070110037993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, B., Vetere, A., & Davis, P. (2020). Should Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) be used with focus groups? Navigating the bumpy road of ‘iterative loops’, idiographic journeys, and ‘phenomenological bridges’. Int J Qualitat Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920921600Google Scholar
Clare, L. (2003). Managing threats to self: awareness in early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Social Sci Med, 57, 1017–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarman et al. 2005. Keeping safe, keeping connected: A qualitative study of HIV-positive women’s experiences of partner relationships. Psychology & Health, 20(4), 533–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500083667Google Scholar
Smith, J., Flowers, P., Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research (3rd ed.). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.Google Scholar
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: a design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Med, 7, 2050312118822927. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armson, G., & Whiteley, A. (2010). Employees’ and managers’ accounts of interactive workplace learning. J Workplace Learn, 22(7), 409–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621011071091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A., & Futing Liao, T. (2004). The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.Google Scholar
Sebastian, K. (2019). Distinguishing between the strains grounded theory: classical, interpretive and constructivist. J Social Thought, 3(1).Google Scholar
Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/h0022100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, K., Minckas, N., Bond, V., et al. (2019). Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions. Trials, 20(1), 329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3439-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiles, R., Crow, G., & Pain, H. (2011). Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review. Qualitat Res, 11, 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geia, L.K., Hayes, B., & Usher, K. (2013). Yarning/Aboriginal storytelling: towards an understanding of an Indigenous perspective and its implications for research practice. Contemp Nurse, 46(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2013.46.1.13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitat Res, 15(2), 219–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475Google Scholar
Bradbury-Jones, C. (2007). Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin’s I’s. J Advanc Nurs, 59(3), 290–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, A., et al. (2015). OT promotes closer interpersonal distance among highly empathic individuals. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 10(1), 3–9, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dheensa, S., Morgan, K., Love, B., & Cramer, H. (2022). Researching men’s violence against women as feminist women researchers: the tensions we face. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221134823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell-Mundine, G. (2012). Reflexivity in Indigenous research: reframing and decolonising research? J Hospitality Tourism Manage, 19(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jht.2012.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G., & Clare, L. (2006). Illness representations and lived experience in early-stage dementia. Qual Health Res, 16(4), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306286851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, V., Samsi, K., Banerjee, S., Morgan, C., & Murray, J. (2011). Threat to valued elements of life: the experience of dementia across three ethnic groups. Gerontologist, 51(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.Google Scholar
Braun, V.C.V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. Sage.Google Scholar
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., et al. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, J. (2020). The changing face of qualitative inquiry. Int J Qualitat Methods, 19, 1609406920909938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920909938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malterud, K., Siersma, V.D., & Guassora, A.D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res, 26(13), 1753–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.Google Scholar
Crosley, J. (2021). What is thematic analysis? Simple definition + examples. Grad Coach. https://gradcoach.com/what-is-thematic-analysis/Google Scholar
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counsell Psychother Res, 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitat Psychol, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, T.R., Biederman, D.J., & Gringle, M.R. (2014). Using research poetics “responsibly”: applications for health promotion research. Int Quart Community Health Educ, 35(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.2190/IQ.35.1.bCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., et al. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337, a1655. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S.A., et al. (2021). A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 374, n2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raine, R., Fitzpatrick, R., & de Pury, J. (2016). Challenges, solutions and future directions in evaluative research. J Health Services Res & Policy, 21(4), 215–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819616664495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yardley, L., Ainsworth, B., Arden-Close, E., & Muller, I. (2015). The person-based approach to enhancing the acceptability and feasibility of interventions. PilotFeasibility Stud, 1(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-015-0033-zGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, V., Kimona, K., Howard, R.J., et al. (2019). Optimising the acceptability and feasibility of acceptance and commitment therapy for treatment-resistant generalised anxiety disorder in older adults. Age Ageing, 48(5), 741–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz082CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, M., İnce, B., Webb, H., et al. (2023). Autopsy of a failed trial: A qualitative investigation of clinician’s views on and experiences of the implementation of the DAISIES trial in UK-based intensive eating disorder services. Eur Eat Disord Rev, 31(4), 489–504. doi: 10.1002/erv.2975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, V., Fossey, J., Ballard, C., Ferreira, N., & Murray, J. (2016). Helping staff to implement psychosocial interventions in care homes: augmenting existing practices and meeting needs for support. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 31(3), 284–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
University of Oxford Ethics Governance (2021). Informed consent: information and guidance for researchers. https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/governance/ethics/resources/consent.Google Scholar
Pittaway, E., Bartolomei, L., & Hugman, R. (2010). ‘Stop stealing our stories’: the ethics of research with vulnerable groups. J Human Rights Pract, 2(2), 229–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huq004Google Scholar
Lester, J.N., & O’Reilly, M. (2015). Is evidence-based practice a threat to the progress of the qualitative community? Arguments from the bottom of the pyramid. Qualitat Inquiry, 21(7), 628–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563808Google Scholar
Steinmetz, G. (2005). The epistemological unconsciousness of US sociology and the transition to post-Fordism: the case of historical sociology. In Remaking modernity: politics, history, and sociology, pp. 109–57. Duke University Press. Chapter DOI: doi.org/10.1515/9780822385882-005Google Scholar
Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Health, 15(2), 215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitat Res Psychol, 18(3), 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238Google Scholar
Whittemore, R., Chase, S.K., & Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitat Health Res, 11(4), 522–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Lester, J.N., & O’Reilly, M. (2021). Introduction to special issue quality in qualitative approaches: celebrating heterogeneity. Qualitat Res Psychol, 18(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1931734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, R.S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ, 322(7294), 1115–17. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., et al. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ, 51(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International J Qualitat Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. Int J Qualitat Methods, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Spiers, N, Qassem, T, Bebbington, P, et al. Prevalence and treatment of common mental disorders in the English national population, 1993–2007. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 209(2): 150–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Forti, M, Quattrone, D, Freeman, TP, et al. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6(5): 427–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hope, S, Pearce, A, Chittleborough, C, et al. Temporal effects of maternal psychological distress on child mental health problems at ages 3, 5, 7 and 11: analysis from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Psychol Med 2019; 49(4): 664–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Susser, ES. Psychiatric epidemiology: searching for the causes of mental disorders. Oxford; Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, KM, Galea, S. Epidemiology matters: a new introduction to methodological foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fett, AJ, Lemmers-Jansen, ILJ, Krabbendam, L. Psychosis and urbanicity: a review of the recent literature from epidemiology to neurourbanism. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2019; 32(3): 232–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, S, Bebbington, PE, Jenkins, R, et al. Data resource profile: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS). Int J Epidemiol 2020; 49(2): 361–2e.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, C, Lappin, J, Heslin, M, et al. Reappraising the long-term course and outcome of psychotic disorders: the AESOP-10 study. Psychol Med 2014; 44(13): 2713–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Craig, TK, Rus-Calafell, M, Ward, T, et al. AVATAR therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations in people with psychosis: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5(1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, C, Cohen, A, Esponda, GM, et al. Epidemiology of untreated psychoses in 3 diverse settings in the Global South: The International Research Program on Psychotic Disorders in Diverse Settings (INTREPID II). JAMA Psychiatry 2023; 80(1): 40–8.Google ScholarPubMed
McGrath, J, Saha, S, Welham, J, et al. A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: the distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology. BMC Med 2004; 2(1): 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perala, J, Suvisaari, J, Saarni, SI, et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64(1): 19–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jongsma, HE, Turner, C, Kirkbride, JB, Jones, PB. International incidence of psychotic disorders, 2002–17: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2019; 4(5): e229–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jongsma, HE, Gayer-Anderson, C, Lasalvia, A, et al. Treated incidence of psychotic disorders in the multinational EU-GEI study. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75(1): 36–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, G, Stapley, S, Newlove-Delgado, T, et al. Time trends in autism diagnosis over 20 years: a UK population-based cohort study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022; 63(6): 674–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, G, Gayer-Anderson, C, Turner, A, et al. Covid-19, social restrictions, and mental distress among young people: a UK longitudinal, population-based study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022; 63(11): 1392–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, S, Susser, E. What is a cause? In Susser, E, Schwartz, S, Morabia, A, Bromet, EJ, eds. Psychiatric epidemiology: searching for the causes of mental disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006: 33–42.Google Scholar
Morgan, C, Gayer-Anderson, C. Childhood adversities and psychosis: evidence, challenges, implications. World Psychiatry 2016; 15(2): 93–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, OD, Murray, RM. Schizophrenia: an integrated sociodevelopmental-cognitive model. Lancet 2014; 383(9929): 1677–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fearon, P, Kirkbride, JB, Morgan, C, et al. Incidence of schizophrenia and other psychoses in ethnic minority groups: results from the MRC AESOP Study. Psychol Med 2006; 36(11): 1541–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demyttenaere, K, Bruffaerts, R, Posada-Villa, J, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 2004; 291(21): 2581–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Knowles, G, Gayer-Anderson, G, Smith, S, et al. Cohort profile: Resilience, Ethnicity, and Adolescent Mental Health (REACH). Int J Epidemiol 2022; 51(5): e303–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gondek, D, Bann, D, Patalay, P, et al. Psychological distress from early adulthood to early old age: evidence from the 1946, 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts. Psychol Med 2022; 52(8): 1471–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patalay, P, Moulton, V, Goodman, A, Ploubidis, GB. Cross-domain symptom development typologies and their antecedents: results from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017; 56(9): 765–76 e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, S-J. Inventing ourselves: the secret life of the teenage brain. New York: PublicAffairs; 2018.Google Scholar
Belsky, J, Caspi, A, Moffitt, TE, Poulton, R. The origins of you: how childhood shapes later life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2020.Google Scholar
Morgan, C, Abdul-Al, R, Lappin, JM, et al. Clinical and social determinants of duration of untreated psychosis in the AESOP first-episode psychosis study. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 189: 446–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gayer-Anderson, C, Jongsma, HE, Di Forti, M, et al. The EUropean Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI): Incidence and First-Episode Case-Control Programme. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2020; 55(5): 645–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quattrone, D, Di Forti, M, Gayer-Anderson, C, et al. Transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology at first episode psychosis: findings from the multinational EU-GEI study. Psychol Med 2019; 49(8): 1378–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bifulco, A, Brown, GW, Harris, TO. Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA): a retrospective interview measure. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994; 35: 1419–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, HL, Craig, TK, Fearon, P, et al. Reliability and comparability of psychosis patients’ retrospective reports of childhood abuse. Schizophr Bull 2011; 37(3): 546–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, C, Pike, C, McManus, S, et al. The contribution of work and non-work stressors to common mental disorders in the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Psychol Med 2012; 42(4): 829–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadsworth, M, Kuh, D, Richards, M, Hardy, R. Cohort Profile: The 1946 National Birth Cohort (MRC National Survey of Health and Development). Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35(1): 49–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gondek, D, Lacey, RE, Blanchflower, DG, Patalay, P. How is the distribution of psychological distress changing over time? Who is driving these changes? Analysis of the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 2022; 57(5): 1007–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, E, Tibber, M, Fearon, P, Patalay, P, Ploubidis, GB. Socioeconomic and sex inequalities in parent-reported adolescent mental ill-health: time trends in four British birth cohorts. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023; 64(5): 758–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, EJ, Richards, M, Ploubidis, GB, Fonagy, P, Patalay, P. Changes in the adult consequences of adolescent mental ill-health: findings from the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts. Psychologic Med 2023; 53(3): 1074–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faris, R, Dunham, H. Mental disorders in urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1939.Google Scholar
Becares, L, Dewey, ME, Das-Munshi, J. Ethnic density effects for adult mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies. Psychologic Med 2018; 48(12): 2054–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehsan, A, Klaas, HS, Bastianen, A, Spini, D. Social capital and health: a systematic review of systematic reviews. SSM Popul Health 2019; 8: 100425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakolis, I, Hammoud, R, Stewart, R, et al. Mental health consequences of urban air pollution: prospective population-based longitudinal survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021; 56(9): 1587–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amrhein, V, Greenland, S, McShane, B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 2019; 567(7748): 305–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverwood, R, Narayanan, M, Dodgeon, B, Ploubidis, G. Handling missing data in the National Child Development Study: User guide (Version 2). London: University College London, 2021.Google Scholar
Hernan, MA, Robins, JM. Causal inference : what if. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis; 2024.Google Scholar
Hanandita, W, Tampubolon, G. Does poverty reduce mental health? An instrumental variable analysis. Soc Sci Med 2014; 113: 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsoutsoulis, K, Maxwell, A, Menon Tarur Padinjareveettil, A, Zivkovic, F, Rogers, JM. Impact of inpatient mental health rehabilitation on psychiatric readmissions: a propensity score matched case control study. J Mental Health 2020; 29(5): 532–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965; 58(5): 295–300.Google ScholarPubMed
Boydell, J, Van Os, J, Lambri, M, et al. Incidence of schizophrenia in south-east London between 1965 and 1997. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182: 45–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, C, Mortensen, P. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between urbanicity during upbringing and schizophrenia risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58: 1039–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantor-Graae, E, Pedersen, CB, McNeil, TF, Mortensen, PB. Migration as a risk factor for schizophrenia: a Danish population-based cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 182: 117–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortensen, PB, Pedersen, CB, Westergaard, T, et al. Effects of family history and place and season of birth on the risk of schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(8): 603–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Os, J, Pedersen, CB, Mortensen, PB. Confirmation of synergy between urbanicity and familial liability in the causation of psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161(12): 2312–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perera, G, Broadbent, M, Callard, F, et al. Cohort profile of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre (SLaM BRC) case register: current status and recent enhancement of an Electronic Mental Health Record-derived data resource. BMJ Open 2016; 6(3): e008721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cybulski, L, Chilman, N, Jewell, A, et al. Improving our understanding of the social determinants of mental health: a data linkage study of mental health records and the 2011 UK census. BMJ Open 2024; 14(1): e073582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downs, JM, Ford, T, Stewart, R, et al. An approach to linking education, social care and electronic health records for children and young people in South London: a linkage study of child and adolescent mental health service data. BMJ Open 2019; 9(1): e024355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevelink, SAM, Bakolis, I, Dorrington, S, et al. Universal Credit receipt among working-age patients who are accessing specialist mental health services: results from a novel data linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2024; 78(9): 592–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdellaoui, A, Yengo, L, Verweij, KJH, Visscher, PM. 15 years of GWAS discovery: realizing the promise. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110(2): 179–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bu, F, Steptoe, A, Fancourt, D. Depressive and anxiety symptoms in adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a panel data analysis over 2 years. PLoS Med 2023; 20(4): e1004144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reininghaus, U, Kempton, MJ, Valmaggia, L, et al. Stress sensitivity, aberrant salience, and threat anticipation in early psychosis: an experience sampling study. Schizophr Bull 2016; 42(3): 712–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichert, M, Braun, U, Lautenbach, S, et al. Studying the impact of built environments on human mental health in everyday life: methodological developments, state-of-the-art and technological frontiers. Curr Opin Psychol 2020; 32: 158–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Gayer-Anderson, C, Knowles, G, Beards, S, et al. Immersive virtual reality as a novel approach to investigate the association between adverse events and adolescent paranoid ideation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2025; 60(2):305–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valmaggia, LR, Latif, L, Kempton, MJ, Rus-Calafell, M. Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review of recent evidence. Psychiatry Res 2016; 236: 189–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grzenda, A, Kraguljac, NV, McDonald, WM, et al. Evaluating the machine learning literature: a primer and user’s guide for psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry 2021; 178(8): 715–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Global Market Insights. Digital health market size by technology, by component, COVID-19 impact analysis, regional outlook, application potential, price trends, competitive market share & forecast, 2021–2027. Global Market Insights, 2020 (www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/digital-health-market).Google Scholar
NHS Health Education England. The Topol review. NHS Health Education England, 2019 (https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/the-topol-review/).Google Scholar
Torous, J, Bucci, S, Bell, IH, et al. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(3):318–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foley, T, Woollard, J. The digital future of mental healthcare and its workforce. NHS Health Education England, 2019 (https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/the-topol-review/).Google Scholar
Onnela, JP, Rauch, SL. Harnessing smartphone-based digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(7):1691–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torous, J, Kiang, MV, Lorme, J, Onnela, JP. New tools for new research in psychiatry: a scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Ment Health. 2016;3(2):e16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, TR. Digital phenotyping: technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA. 2017;318(13):1215–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huckvale, K, Venkatesh, S, Christensen, H. Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, SA, Adamo, KB, Hamel, ME, et al. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tackett, JL, Brandes, CM, King, KM, Markon, KE. Psychology’s replication crisis and clinical psychological science. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:579–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, G, Saunders, KEA. Remote monitoring for understanding mechanisms and prediction in psychiatry. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2019;6:51–6.Google Scholar
Meyer, N, Joyce, D, Karr, C, De Vos, M, Dijk, D, Jacobson, N & MacCabe, J. The temporal dynamics of sleep disturbance and psychopathology in psychosis: a digital sampling study. Psychol Med [Epub ahead of print] Jan 12 2021. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torous, J, Keshavan, M. Towards precision clinical trials and personalized prevention in CHR with smartphone digital phenotyping and personal sensing tools. Schizophr Res. 2021;227:61–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, NC, Weingarden, H, Wilhelm, S. Digital biomarkers of mood disorders and symptom change. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, SE, van Hees, VT, Mazzotti, DR, et al. Genetic studies of accelerometer-based sleep measures yield new insights into human sleep behaviour. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camacho, E, Brady, RO, Lizano, P, Keshavan, M, Torous, J. Advancing translational research through the interface of digital phenotyping and neuroimaging: a narrative review. Biomark Neuropsychiatry. 2021;4:100032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebner-Priemer, U, Santangelo, P. Digital phenotyping: hype or hope? Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(4):297–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torous, J, Rodriguez, J, Powell, A. The new digital divide for digital biomarkers. Digit Biomark. 2017;1(1):87–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Martin, N, Greely, HT, Cho, MK. Ethical development of digital phenotyping tools for mental health applications: Delphi study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(7):e27343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biagianti, B, Hidalgo-Mazzei, D, Meyer, N. Developing digital interventions for people living with serious mental illness: perspectives from three mHealth studies. Evidence-Based Mental Health. 2017;20(4):98–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faurholt-Jepsen, M, Geddes, JR, Goodwin, GM, et al. Reporting guidelines on remotely collected electronic mood data in mood disorder (eMOOD)-recommendations. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsanas, A, Saunders, K, Bilderbeck, A, et al. Clinical insight into latent variables of psychiatric questionnaires for mood symptom self-assessment. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(2):e15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wichers, M, Schreuder, MJ, Goekoop, R, Groen, RN. Can we predict the direction of sudden shifts in symptoms? Transdiagnostic implications from a complex systems perspective on psychopathology. Psychol Med. 2019;49(3):380–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henson, P, D’Mello, R, Vaidyam, A, Keshavan, M, Torous, J. Anomaly detection to predict relapse risk in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lydon-Staley, DM, Barnett, I, Satterthwaite, TD, Bassett, DS. Digital phenotyping for psychiatry: accommodating data and theory with network science methodologies. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2019;9:8–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benoit, J, Onyeaka, H, Keshavan, M, Torous, J. Systematic review of digital phenotyping and machine learning in psychosis spectrum illnesses. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2020;28(5):296–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myin-Germeys, I, Kasanova, Z, Vaessen, T, et al. Experience sampling methodology in mental health research: new insights and technical developments. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):123–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohr, DC, Zhang, M, Schueller, SM. Personal sensing: understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017;13:23–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, KE, Bilderbeck, AC, Panchal, P, et al. Experiences of remote mood and activity monitoring in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;41:115–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodday, SM, Atkinson, L, Goodwin, G, et al. The True Colours remote symptom monitoring system: a decade of evolution. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(1):e15188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez Arribas, I, Goodwin, GM, Geddes, JR, Lyons, T, Saunders, KEA. A signature-based machine learning model for distinguishing bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8(1):274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsanas, A, Saunders, KE, Bilderbeck, AC, et al. Daily longitudinal self-monitoring of mood variability in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. J Affect Disord. 2016;205:225–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmius, N, Tsanas, A, Saunders, KEA, et al. Detecting bipolar depression from geographic location data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(8):1761–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmius, N, Saunders, KEA, Carr, O, et al. Group-personalized regression models for predicting mental health scores from objective mobile phone data streams: observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(10):e10194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, G, McGowan, NM, Palmius, N, et al. Digital communication biomarkers of mood and diagnosis in borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, and healthy control populations. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:610457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, NM, Goodwin, GM, Bilderbeck, AC, Saunders, KEA. Circadian rest-activity patterns in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, NM, Goodwin, GM, Bilderbeck, AC, Saunders, KEA. Actigraphic patterns, impulsivity and mood instability in bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and healthy controls. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020;141(4):374–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, O, Saunders, KEA, Tsanas, A, et al. Variability in phase and amplitude of diurnal rhythms is related to variation of mood in bipolar and borderline personality disorder. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, O, Saunders, KEA, Bilderbeck, AC, et al. Desynchronization of diurnal rhythms in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8(1):79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, NM, Nichols, M, Bilderbeck, AC, Goodwin, GM, Saunders, KEA. Blood pressure in bipolar disorder: evidence of elevated pulse pressure and associations between mean pressure and mood instability. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021;9(1):5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucaille, A. Mental health goes mobile: The mental health app market will keep on growing. Deloitte. (www2.deloitte.com/xe/en/insights/industry/technology/technology-media-and-telecom-predictions/2022/mental-health-app-market.html).Google Scholar
Thomas, JM, Higgs, S, Dourish, CT. Test-retest reliability and effects of repeated testing and satiety on performance of an emotional test battery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;38(4):416–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Lyreskog, DM, Pavarini, G, Lorimer, J, et al. How to build a game for empirical bioethics research: the case of ‘Tracing Tomorrow’. Health Expect 2022;25(1):304–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firth, J, Torous, J, Nicholas, J, et al. The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptom: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World Psychiatry 2017;16(3):287–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisel, KK, Fuhrmann, LM, Berking, M, et al. Standalone smartphone apps for mental health – a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digital Med 2019;2:118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagan, S, D’Mello, R, Vaidyam, A, Bilden, R, Torous, J. Assessing mental health apps marketplaces with objective metrics from 29.190 data points from 287 apps. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021;144(2):201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mental Health Innovations. Data & Research. Mental Health Innovations. (https://mentalhealthinnovations.org/data-research/).Google Scholar
Ewbank, MP, Cummins, R, Tablan, V, et al. Quantifying the association between psychotherapy content and clinical outcomes using deep learning. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(1):35–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statista. Share of adults who own a smartphone in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2008 and 2019 to 2021, by demographics. (www.statista.com/statistics/956297/ownership-of-smartphones-uk/).Google Scholar
Ofcom. Digital exclusion: a review of Ofcom’s research on digital exclusion amongst adults in the UK. (www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/234364/digital-exclusion-review-2022.pdf).Google Scholar
Statista. Do you personally use a smartphone? – by age. (www.statista.com/statistics/300402/smartphone-usage-in-the-uk-by-age/).Google Scholar
Alzheimer’s Research UK. Sea Hero Quest. (www.alzheimersresearchuk.org/research/for-researchers/resources-and-information/sea-hero-quest).Google Scholar
Valmaggia, LR, Freeman, D, Green, C, et al. Virtual reality and paranoid ideations in people with an ‘at risk-mental state’ for psychosis. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2007;51:63–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Howett, D, Castegnaro, A, Krzywicka, K, et al. Differentiation of mild cognitive impairment using an entorhinal cortex-based test of virtual reality navigation. Brain. 2019;142(6):1751–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzo, A, Reger, G, Perlman, K, et al. Virtual reality posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exposure therapy results with active duty OIF/OEF service members. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2011;10(4):301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gujjar, KR, Van Wijk, A, Kumar, R, De Jongh, A. Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of dental phobia in adults: a randomised controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord. 2019;62:100–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, PL, Price, M, Edwards, SM, et al. Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81:751–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentz, D, Wang, N, Ibach, MK, et al. Effectiveness of a stand-alone, smartphone-based virtual reality exposure app to reduce fear of heights in real-life: a randomized trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4:16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, D, Lambe, S, Kabir, T, et al. Automated virtual reality therapy to treat agoraphobic avoidance and distress in patients with psychosis (gameChange): a multicentre, parallel-group, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial in England with mediation and moderation analyses. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(5):375–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, V, Stewart, I, Jenkins, KG, et al. Bringing the outside in: the feasibility of virtual reality with people with dementia in an inpatient psychiatric care setting. Dementia 2021;20(1):106–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aafjes-van Doorn, K. The complexity of teletherapy: not better or worse, but different. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2022;29(2):182–4.Google Scholar
Patel, R, Irving, J, Brinn, A, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on remote mental healthcare and prescribing in psychiatry: an electronic health record study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e046365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekkering, E, Shim, J.P. Trust in videoconferencing. Communications of the ACM. 2006;49(7):103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, T, Gale-Grant, O. Telepsychiatry: what clinicians need to know about digital mental healthcare. BJPsych Advances. [Epub ahead of print] Jul 11 2022. doi: 10.1192/bja.2022.42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleton, R, Williams, J, Vera San Juan, N, et al. Implementation, adoption, and perceptions of telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e31746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvari, G, Coviello, L, Furlanello, C. EYE-C: eye-contact robust detection and analysis during unconstrained child-therapist interactions in the clinical setting of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Sci. 2021;11(12):1555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, KLH, Hahemi, J, Campbell, K, et al. Digital behavioral phenotyping detects atypical pattern of facial expression in toddlers with autism. Autism Res. 2021;14(3):488–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Martin, N. What are important ethical implications of using facial recognition technology in health care? AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(2):E180–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Greer, B, Robotham, D, Simblett, S, et al. Digital exclusion among mental health service users: qualitative investigation. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e11696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riches, S, Pisani, S, Bird, L, et al. Virtual reality-based assessment and treatment of social functioning impairments in psychosis: a systematic review. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021;33(3):337–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, IH, Nicholas, J, Alvarez-Jimenez, M, Thompson, A, Valmaggia, L. Virtual reality as a clinical tool in mental health research and practice. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020;22(2):169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hidalgo-Mazzei, D, Reinares, M, Mateu, A, et al. OpenSIMPLe: a real-world implementation feasibility study of a smartphone-based psychoeducation programme for bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:436–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, D, Reeve, S, Robinson, A, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med. 2017;47(14):2393–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiang, MV, Chen, JT, Krieger, N, et al. Sociodemographic characteristics of missing data in digital phenotyping. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehan, AJ, Lewis, SJ, Fazel, S, et al. Clinical prediction models in psychiatry: a systematic review of two decades of progress and challenges. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(6):2700–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haines-Delmont, A, Chahal, G, Bruen, AJ, et al. Testing suicide risk prediction algorithms using phone measurements with patients in acute mental health settings: feasibility study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(6):e15901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this book
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.