Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-kfd97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-20T15:54:14.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Japan: A Different Model of Mathematics Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2025

Estela A. Gavosto
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Steven G. Krantz
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
William McCallum
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access

Summary

Undergraduate and K-12 mathematics education in the United States have seen many reforms during the past decade. With the initial results of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) appearing in October, 1996, there is also considerable interest in mathematics education elsewhere, especially Japan. A major revision in the K-12 curriculum in Japan has recently occurred, and the Mathematical Society of Japan has formed the Working Group for Undergraduate Mathematics, a committee of educators and mathematicians, to examine undergraduate mathematics education in Japan.

The success of the Japanese educational system in producing students who excel in mathematics is well-known and is pointed out in the results of TIMSS. This study was sponsored by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement and involved approximately fifty nations world-wide. TIMSS focused on grades four, eight, and twelve, with Germany, Japan, and the United States receiving special attention [16; 17]. Unlike the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards, which merely makes recommendations for K-12, Japan has a nationally set curriculum [5; 6; 12]. Since a fifth grade mathematics class in Tokyo will be covering roughly the same material as a class in Nagasaki or Sapporo during any given time of the academic year, Japanese educators have an opportunity to collaborate and polish lessons on a nationwide scale. This is not the case in U.S. schools, where the curriculum is locally controlled. In fact, the “TIMSS study of curricula found that current U.S. standards are unfocused and aimed at the lowest common denominator.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×