We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) is characterized by abnormal functional connectivity among distributed brain regions. Increasing evidence suggests a role for the limbic network (LN) and the triple network model in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). However, the specific relationship between the LN and the triple network in PBD remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the aberrant causal connections among these four core networks in PBD.
Method
Resting-state functional MRI scans from 92 PBD patients and 40 healthy controls (HCs) were analyzed. Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) was employed to assess effective connectivity (EC) among the four core networks. Parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) analysis was conducted to identify ECs associated with group differences, as well as depression and mania severity. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was used to test predictive accuracy.
Result
Compared to HCs, PBD patients exhibited primarily excitatory bottom-up connections from the LN to the salience network (SN) and bidirectional excitatory connections between the default mode network (DMN) and SN. In PBD, top-down connectivity from the triple network to the LN was excitatory in individuals with higher depression severity but inhibitory in those with higher mania severity. LOOCV identified dysconnectivity circuits involving the caudate and hippocampus as being associated with mania and depression severity, respectively.
Conclusions
Disrupted bottom-up connections from the LN to the triple network distinguish PBD patients from healthy controls, while top-down disruptions from the triple network to LN relate to mood state differences. These findings offer insight into the neural mechanisms of PBD.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic mental illness characterized by abnormal functional connectivity among distributed brain regions. Previous studies have primarily focused on undirected functional connectivity and rarely reported from network perspective.
Methods
To better understand between or within-network connectivities of OCD, effective connectivity (EC) of a large-scale network is assessed by spectral dynamic causal modeling with eight key regions of interests from default mode (DMN), salience (SN), frontoparietal (FPN) and cerebellum networks, based on large sample size including 100 OCD patients and 120 healthy controls (HCs). Parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) framework was used to identify the difference between the two groups. We further analyzed the relationship between connections and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS).
Results
OCD and HCs shared some similarities of inter- and intra-network patterns in the resting state. Relative to HCs, patients showed increased ECs from left anterior insula (LAI) to medial prefrontal cortex, right anterior insula (RAI) to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (R-DLPFC) to cerebellum anterior lobe (CA), CA to posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and to anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Moreover, weaker from LAI to L-DLPFC, RAI to ACC, and the self-connection of R-DLPFC. Connections from ACC to CA and from L-DLPFC to PCC were positively correlated with compulsion and obsession scores (r = 0.209, p = 0.037; r = 0.199, p = 0.047, uncorrected).
Conclusions
Our study revealed dysregulation among DMN, SN, FPN, and cerebellum in OCD, emphasizing the role of these four networks in achieving top-down control for goal-directed behavior. There existed a top-down disruption among these networks, constituting the pathophysiological and clinical basis.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.