To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Adverbials do not only fulfil various semantic functions and come in various shapes and sizes; they may also be either obligatory or optional. However, it is the status as an optional, often inherently flexible constituent that has resulted in its frequent neglect in previous research. This holds true especially in relation to fronting, commonly defined as the sentence-initial placement of core elements. This paper proposes a distinction between two kinds of fronting phenomena, namely fronting (i.e., the initial placement of optional sentence constituents, enabling the consideration of optional adverbials) and preposing (i.e., the initial placement of obligatory constituents). It investigates the production of adverbial fronting phenomena in German learners of English compared to their native-speaker peers. While some of the results confirm a number of findings attested in previous research endeavours (e.g., the overrepresentation of particular semantic functions in sentence-initial position), others, including the correlation between the likelihood of encountering a fronted adverbial and sentence length and, with regard to the native speaker data, the newness of information, are more surprising. All in all, the paper proves the importance and justification of the consideration of adverbial fronting (as opposed to preposing) as part of the study of non-canonical syntax.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.