To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Health research needs to reflect meaningful ethnic diversity in research design and recruitment. This chapter outlines some of the factors that both contribute and perpetuate barriers to effective representation of minority ethnicities in research and concludes with some recommendations that can be adopted to improve engagement of minority ethnicities in research as a forethought in research design and application.The term minority ethnics is used in recognition that white people also have ethnicities but is interchangeable with ethnic minorities. The chapter uses examples of how the two largest minority ethnicities comprising South Asians and African-Caribbeans in the UK are consistently under-represented in health research of diabetes, dementia, cardiovascular and cancer medicine where they are disproportionately over-burdened compared to the white population. As a consequence, much of the good research in these conditions is mainly based upon white populations with generalisation to other minority ethnic groups. We highlight how disaggregation of ethnic population data is essential to identify differential cultural, social and health needs and how generalisability of health interventions are potentially flawed by a lack of minority ethnic representation leading to either inaccurate or ineffective health interventions that lead to poorer health outcomes.Despite little research into the factors that contribute to this under-representation, the few studies that exist help outline their origins within historical, cultural, experiential and perceptual mistrust perpetuated by systematic and institutional racism. These key barriers need to be understood to avoid perpetuating these pitfalls in future research. The chapter concludes with ways to facilitate and implement solutions guided by the principles of community-based participatory research.
The Open Science [OS] movement aims to foster the wide dissemination, scrutiny and re-use of research components for the good of science and society. This Element examines the role played by OS principles and practices within contemporary research and how this relates to the epistemology of science. After reviewing some of the concerns that have prompted calls for more openness, it highlights how the interpretation of openness as the sharing of resources, so often encountered in OS initiatives and policies, may have the unwanted effect of constraining epistemic diversity and worsening epistemic injustice, resulting in unreliable and unethical scientific knowledge. By contrast, this Element proposes to frame openness as the effort to establish judicious connections among systems of practice, predicated on a process-oriented view of research as a tool for effective and responsible agency. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.