To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Digital tools offer promising solutions to improve eligibility screening, recruitment, and retention in research, particularly in human genetic studies where representative sampling is critical. SMS text messaging has been found effective in population-based survey research, but evidence of its impact on genetic study recruitment – and how it varies by demographics – is limited.
Objective:
We examined the effect of tailored SMS messages on enrollment in a population-based genomic screening study. We assessed differences in message open and consent rates across four message types and explored how these outcomes varied by demographic factors.
Methods:
Participants were randomized to receive one of four SMS messages emphasizing different social values: generic, individual impact, community impact, or research discoveries. We calculated descriptive statistics for open and consent rates and used generalized linear logistic regression and Pearson’s Chi-Square Test to assess demographic differences.
Results:
Among 15,977 messages sent, 2.4% were opened (n = 382), and 35.3% of those who opened consented (n = 135). Females were more likely than males to open (3.1% vs. 1.6%) and consent (1.1% vs. 0.5%). Individuals aged 30–39 had the highest open rate (3.4%), and those 40–49 had the highest consent rate (1.6%). Message type was not significantly associated with open or consent rates.
Conclusion:
Sociodemographic factors were more predictive of engagement than message content. Tailoring messages by demographic group may improve recruitment in genomic studies. Future research should explore the drivers of participant engagement in digital recruitment strategies.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.