To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter and the next balance the previous one. All three are about ways in which we think with narrative. But where in the last chapter, we focused on conflicts between narratives, in this one and the next, we are looking at conflicts within narratives. Where in the last chapter, we looked at the ways in which narratives are used as armament in a contest of narratives like a trial, a political race, or an intellectual controversy, now we are looking at narratives as themselves structured as contests, the claims of which they may or may not negotiate successfully, thereby achieving closure or remaining open.
I'm only speculating, but it could be that the neglect of space in the study of narrative may have come from the fact that narrative scholars, especially in the early years, tended to focus on verbal narrative, oral and written. These are forms where the audience cannot physically see what's happening.
Recalling Chapter 5, if closure at the level of expectations coincides with closure at the level of questions, it resolves issues that are carried by the agon. But with narratives of any complexity, this is hard to pull off – at least, without reduction. At the level of expectations, Sophocles's Oedipus Tyrannus appears to end emphatically with Jocasta's suicide and Oedipus's self-blinding.
If the creative leeway between script and performance is wide in the production of plays, it is enormous when adaptation crosses media boundaries. This is necessarily the case. Reviewers who complain that a film or play is a poor “translation” of the original may miss the fact that adaptation across media is not translation in anything but the loosest sense.
As you move to the outer edges of a narrative, you may find that it is embedded in another narrative. The containing narrative is what is called a framing narrative. Classic examples of framing narratives, or frame-tales, are Boccaccio's Decameron (1351–53), Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (1387–1400), and the Thousand and One Nights (c. 1450), in which an embracing narrative acts as a framework within which many tales are told.