To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This book, written by a non-statistician for non-statisticians, emphasises the practical approach to those problems in statistics which arise regularly in data analysis situations in nuclear and high-energy physics experiments. Rather than concentrating on formal proofs of theorems, an abundant use of simple examples illustrates the general ideas which are presented, showing the reader how to obtain the maximum information from the data in the simplest manner. Possible difficulties with the various techniques, and pitfalls to be avoided, are also discussed. Based on a series of lectures given by the author to both students and staff at Oxford, this common-sense approach to statistics will enable nuclear physicists to understand better how to do justice to their data in both analysis and interpretation. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.
This book, written by a non-statistician for non-statisticians, emphasises the practical approach to those problems in statistics which arise regularly in data analysis situations in nuclear and high-energy physics experiments. Rather than concentrating on formal proofs of theorems, an abundant use of simple examples illustrates the general ideas which are presented, showing the reader how to obtain the maximum information from the data in the simplest manner. Possible difficulties with the various techniques, and pitfalls to be avoided, are also discussed. Based on a series of lectures given by the author to both students and staff at Oxford, this common-sense approach to statistics will enable nuclear physicists to understand better how to do justice to their data in both analysis and interpretation. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.
Another question concerns the oscillations of pendulums, and it falis into two parts. One is whether all oscillations, large, medium, and small, are truly and precisely made in equal times. The other concerns the ratio of times for bodies hung from unequal threads; the times of their vibrations, I mean…. As to the prior question, whether the same pendulum makes all its oscillations – the largest, the average, and the smallest – in truly and exactly equal times, I submit myself to that which I once heard from our Academician [Galileo]. He demonstrated that the moveable which falls along chords subtended by every arc [of a given circle] necessarily passes over them all in equal times….
As to the ratio of times of oscillations of bodies hanging from strings of different lengths, those times are as the square roots of the string lengths; or should we say that the lengths are as the doubled ratios, or squares, of the times.
Galileo Galilei, Two New Sciences (1638)
FINDING A CLOCK THAT WOULDN'T GET SEASICK
Navigation has provided one of the most persistent motives for measuring time accurately. All navigators depend on continuous time information to find out where they are and to chart their course. But until about two centuries ago, no one was able to make a clock that could keep time accurately at sea.
We have seen that the gaseous and liquid states are only distant stages of the same condition of matter, and are capable of passing into one another by a process of continuous change. A problem of far greater difficulty yet remains to be solved, the possible continuity of the liquid and solid states of matter. The fine discovery made some years ago by James Thomson, of the influence of pressure on the temperature at which liquefaction occurs, and verified experimentally by Sir. W. Thomson, points, as it appears to me, to the direction this inquiry must take; and in the case at least of those bodies which expand in liquefying, and whose melting-points are raised by pressure, the transition may possibly be effected. But this must be a subject for future investigation; and for the present I will not venture to go beyond the conclusion I have already drawn from direct experiment, that the gaseous and liquid forms of matter may be transformed into one another by a series of continuous and unbroken changes.
Thomas Andrews, Philosophical Transactions of 1869
COOLING OFF
How do you make something colder? Making something hotter is easy. For example, if you need to warm yourself on a chilly night, you can build a fire with little or no technology. But to cool yourself on a hot day is quite another matter.
Hitherto we have explained the phenomena of the heavens and of our sea by the power of gravity, but have not yet assigned the cause of this power. This is certain, that it must proceed from a cause that penetrates to the very centres of the sun and planets, without suffering the least diminution of its force; that operates not according to the quantity of the surfaces of the particles upon which it acts (as mechanical causes used to do), but according to the quantity of the solid matter which they contain, and propagates its virtue on all sides to immense distances, decreasing always as the inverse square of the distances.
Isaac Newton, Printipia (1686)
THE GENESIS OF AN IDEA
The year was 1665, the month was August, and Cambridge, England, was besieged by bubonic plague. Isaac Newton, then a 23-year-old university student, retired to the solitude of his family's farm in Lincolnshire until the plague subsided and the university reopened. Not taking kindly to inactivity, Newton composed 22 questions for himself to tackle, ranging from geometric constructions to Galileo's new mechanics to Kepler's planetary laws. During the next 18 months, he immersed himself in the search for answers and along the way discovered calculus, the laws of motion, and the universal law of gravity.
And with respect to the general cause, it seems manifest to me that it is none other than God himself, who, in the beginning, created matter along with motion and rest, and now by his ordinary concourse alone preserves in the whole the same amount of motion and rest that he placed in it. For although motion is nothing in the matter moved but its mode, it has yet a certain and determinate quantity, which we easily see may remain always the same in the whole universe, although it changes in each of the parts of it.
René Descartes, Principles of Philosophy (1644)
THE UNIVERSE AS A MACHINE
In the seventeenth century science assumed its modern form and the scientific spirit infected Europe. It was then that Aristotle's view of nature was rejected and Galileo's great book of the universe was adopted. The new science was nourished by an optimism that mankind could discover the laws of nature.
One of the most significant and influential figures in seventeenth-century natural philosophy was René Descartes. Early in his life, Descartes rebelled against the traditions in which he had been thoroughly educated. He sought new foundations for knowledge, foundations which could underpin confidence in our understanding of nature. Convinced of the indubitable logic of mathematics, Descartes chose to identify mathematics with physics.
Descartes is credited with having been the first person to state the law of inertia correctly.
The initial shock [of acceleration] is the worst part of it, for he is thrown upward as if by an explosion of gun powder…. Therefore he must be dazed by opiates beforehand; his limbs must be carefully protected so that they are not torn from him and the recoil is spread over all parts of his body. Then he will meet new difficulties: immense cold and inhibited respiration…. When the first part of the journey is completed, it becomes easier because on such a long journey the body no doubt escapes the magnetic force of the earth and enters that of the moon, so that the latter gets the upper hand. At this point we set the travellers free and leave them to their own devices: like spiders they will stretch out and contract, and propel themselves forward by their own force – for, as the magnetic forces of the earth and moon both attract the body and hold it suspended, the effect is as if neither of them were attracting it – so that in the end its mass will by itself turn toward the moon.
–Johannes Kepler, Somnium, published posthumously in 1634
FREEWAYS IN THE SKY
Not many years ago, the only conceivable use of the beautiful celestial mechanics developed over hundreds of years was to compute the positions of bodies in the heavens. Today that situation has changed radically.
First of all, it is necessary to note that each pendulum has its own time of vibration, so limited and fixed in advance that it is impossible to move it in any other period than its own unique natural one. Take in hand any string you like, to which a weight is attached, and try the best you can to increase or diminish the frequency of its vibrations; this will be a mere waste of effort. On the other hand, we confer motion on any pendulum, though heavy and at rest, by merely blowing on it. This motion may be quite large if we repeat our puffs; yet it will take place only in accord with the time appropriate to its oscillations. If at the first puff we shall have moved it half an inch from the vertical, by adding the second when, returned toward us, it would commence its second vibration, we confer a new motion on it; and thus successively with more puffs given at the right time (not when the pendulum is going toward us, for thus we should impede the motion and not assist it), and continuing with many impulses, we shall confer on it impetus such that much greater force than a breath would be needed to stop it.
Galileo Galilei, Two New Sciences (1638)
FORCED OSCILLATIONS
Galileo was not the only famous member of the Galilei family; his father Vincenzo was an accomplished and articulate musician.
The heavenly motions are nothing but a continuous song for several voices (perceived by the intellect, not by the ear); a music which, through discordant tensions, through sincopes and cadenzas, as it were (as men employed them in imitation of those natural discords), progresses towards certain predesigned, quasi six-voiced clausuras, and thereby sets landmarks in the immeasurable flow of time, tt is, therefore, no longer surprising that man, in imitation of his creator, has at last discovered the art of figured song, which was unknown to the ancients. Man wanted to reproduce the continuity of cosmic time within a short hour, by an artful symphony for several voices, to obtain a sample test of the delight of the Divine Creator in His works, and to partake of his joy by making music in imitation of God.
Johannes Kepler. Harmony of the World (1618)
Nature and Nature's law lay hid in night.
God said: “Let Newton be”; and all was light.
Alexander Pope, “Epitaph Intended for Sir Isaac Newton”
WINDING UP THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE
We've now arrived at the final chapter in our study of the mechanical universe. In our story we've introduced revolutionary ideas and heroes from Copernicus to Newton, and just as they did before us, we've linked the physics of the heavens to the physics of the earth.
Everybody knows that heat can cause movement, that it possesses great motive power; steam engines so common today are a vivid and familiar proof of it. … The study of these engines is of the greatest interest, their importance is enormous, and their use increases every day. They seem destined to produce a great revolution in the civilized world….
Despite studies of all kinds devoted to steam engines, and in spite of the satisfactory state they have reached today, the theory of them has advanced very little and the attempts to improve them are still directed almost by chance.
Sadi Camot, “The Motive Power of Heat” (1824)
THE AGE OF STEAM
The age of steam is past. The steam engine is a curiosity, an object of nostalgia that has been replaced by diesel engines, electric motors, turbine engines, and gasoline engines to drive the wheels of civilization. Nonetheless, steam did have its day. The steam engine not only caused the industrial revolution, which changed our lives, it also led to discoveries in physics so profound that they changed the way we think. How did investigations into the nature of steam engines lead to a deeper understanding of the universe?
First, we need to understand how a steam engine operates. In essence, a steam engine is a device which heats water in a dosed container, a boiler, thereby converting it to steam.
“Also I do not at all believe that the judgment wch is given can be taken for a final judgment of the [Royal] Society. Yet Mr Newton has caused it to be published to the world by a book printed expressly for discrediting me, and sent it into Germany, into France and into Italy in the name of the Society …
As for me I have always carried myself with the greatest respect that could be towards Mr Newton. And tho it appears now that there is great room to doubt whether he knew my invention before he had it from me; yet I have spoken as if he had of himself found something like my method; but being abused by some flatterers ill advised, he has taken the liberty to attaque me in a manner very sensible. Judge now Sr, from what side that should principally come wch is requisite to terminate this controversy.”
Leibniz's reply to the Royal Society on the priority claim, 28 April 1714
ANTIDIFFERENTIATION, THE REVERSE OF DIFFERENTIATION
We saw by examples in earlier chapters that laws of physics are often expressed as equations about the rate at which things change – that is, equations about derivatives.
In discussing falling bodies in Chapter 2, we started with a knowledge of the distance function (how far a body falls in a given time), then took its derivative to find its speed (how fast it is falling), and then took the derivative of the speed to find its acceleration (how fast it was getting faster).