To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
c. 1663–4. Nine essays in Latin, of which I–VIII are printed here. There is no general title, each essay being individually titled. MS Locke, e. 6 is in Locke's hand but contains only Essays IV–IX; f. 31 is a copy of the whole text in the hand of an amanuensis with corrections and additions by Locke; there is a later copy in f. 30, pp. 122–84 (which Locke marked ‘Lex Na[tur]ae’). Printed in Von Leyden 1954; Horwitz et al. 1990 (under the title Questions Concerning the Law of Nature); extracts in Raphael 1969, 1, 160–66; Wootton 1993, pp. 177–83. Discussed in Von Leyden 1954 and 1956; Singh 1961; Seliger 1963; Abrams 1967, pp. 84–107; Dunn 1969, chs. 3, 14; Snyder 1986. Cited by Laslett, First Treatise, §86; Second Treatise, §§12, 14, 51, 57, 77, 93. Letters 104, 106, 932 and 957 are pertinent. The present text reproduces Von Leyden's translation (1954, pp. 109–215). He used MS f. 31 as his copy-text; arguably he should have used MS e. 6 for Essays IV–IX. For criticism of his edition see Horwitz et al 1990 and Stewart 1992. Horwitz argues, inter alia, that Von Leyden's use of such Christian terms as ‘Almighty God’ and ‘Adam’ is not warranted by the Latin text. I have retained Von Leyden's numbering of the essays: in fact, Locke numbered from 1 to XII, but left three as titles only, without corresponding text. […]