We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
First of all, it is necessary to note that each pendulum has its own time of vibration, so limited and fixed in advance that it is impossible to move it in any other period than its own unique natural one. Take in hand any string you like, to which a weight is attached, and try the best you can to increase or diminish the frequency of its vibrations; this will be a mere waste of effort. On the other hand, we confer motion on any pendulum, though heavy and at rest, by merely blowing on it. This motion may be quite large if we repeat our puffs; yet it will take place only in accord with the time appropriate to its oscillations. If at the first puff we shall have moved it half an inch from the vertical, by adding the second when, returned toward us, it would commence its second vibration, we confer a new motion on it; and thus successively with more puffs given at the right time (not when the pendulum is going toward us, for thus we should impede the motion and not assist it), and continuing with many impulses, we shall confer on it impetus such that much greater force than a breath would be needed to stop it.
Galileo Galilei, Two New Sciences (1638)
FORCED OSCILLATIONS
Galileo was not the only famous member of the Galilei family; his father Vincenzo was an accomplished and articulate musician.
The heavenly motions are nothing but a continuous song for several voices (perceived by the intellect, not by the ear); a music which, through discordant tensions, through sincopes and cadenzas, as it were (as men employed them in imitation of those natural discords), progresses towards certain predesigned, quasi six-voiced clausuras, and thereby sets landmarks in the immeasurable flow of time, tt is, therefore, no longer surprising that man, in imitation of his creator, has at last discovered the art of figured song, which was unknown to the ancients. Man wanted to reproduce the continuity of cosmic time within a short hour, by an artful symphony for several voices, to obtain a sample test of the delight of the Divine Creator in His works, and to partake of his joy by making music in imitation of God.
Johannes Kepler. Harmony of the World (1618)
Nature and Nature's law lay hid in night.
God said: “Let Newton be”; and all was light.
Alexander Pope, “Epitaph Intended for Sir Isaac Newton”
WINDING UP THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE
We've now arrived at the final chapter in our study of the mechanical universe. In our story we've introduced revolutionary ideas and heroes from Copernicus to Newton, and just as they did before us, we've linked the physics of the heavens to the physics of the earth.
Everybody knows that heat can cause movement, that it possesses great motive power; steam engines so common today are a vivid and familiar proof of it. … The study of these engines is of the greatest interest, their importance is enormous, and their use increases every day. They seem destined to produce a great revolution in the civilized world….
Despite studies of all kinds devoted to steam engines, and in spite of the satisfactory state they have reached today, the theory of them has advanced very little and the attempts to improve them are still directed almost by chance.
Sadi Camot, “The Motive Power of Heat” (1824)
THE AGE OF STEAM
The age of steam is past. The steam engine is a curiosity, an object of nostalgia that has been replaced by diesel engines, electric motors, turbine engines, and gasoline engines to drive the wheels of civilization. Nonetheless, steam did have its day. The steam engine not only caused the industrial revolution, which changed our lives, it also led to discoveries in physics so profound that they changed the way we think. How did investigations into the nature of steam engines lead to a deeper understanding of the universe?
First, we need to understand how a steam engine operates. In essence, a steam engine is a device which heats water in a dosed container, a boiler, thereby converting it to steam.
“Also I do not at all believe that the judgment wch is given can be taken for a final judgment of the [Royal] Society. Yet Mr Newton has caused it to be published to the world by a book printed expressly for discrediting me, and sent it into Germany, into France and into Italy in the name of the Society …
As for me I have always carried myself with the greatest respect that could be towards Mr Newton. And tho it appears now that there is great room to doubt whether he knew my invention before he had it from me; yet I have spoken as if he had of himself found something like my method; but being abused by some flatterers ill advised, he has taken the liberty to attaque me in a manner very sensible. Judge now Sr, from what side that should principally come wch is requisite to terminate this controversy.”
Leibniz's reply to the Royal Society on the priority claim, 28 April 1714
ANTIDIFFERENTIATION, THE REVERSE OF DIFFERENTIATION
We saw by examples in earlier chapters that laws of physics are often expressed as equations about the rate at which things change – that is, equations about derivatives.
In discussing falling bodies in Chapter 2, we started with a knowledge of the distance function (how far a body falls in a given time), then took its derivative to find its speed (how fast it is falling), and then took the derivative of the speed to find its acceleration (how fast it was getting faster).
In order to obtain physical ideas without adopting a physical theory we must make ourselves familiar with the existence of physical analogies. By a physical analogy I mean that partial similarity between the laws of one science and those of another which makes each of them illustrate the other. Thus all the mathematical sciences are founded on relations between physical laws and laws of numbers, so that the aim of exact science is to reduce the problems of nature to the determination of quantities by operations with numbers. Passing from the most universal analogies to a very partial one, we find the same resemblance in mathematical form between two different phenomena giving rise to a physical theory of light.
James Clerk Maxwell, “On Faraday's Lines of Force” (1855)
FINDING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM
The flood of forces identified and classified in the eighteenth century was reduced to a trickle after it was realized that electric forces were responsible for many phenomena. Nature, it seemed, acknowledged only a handful of forces. Each force had its own “universal constant.” For electric forces, it was Ke; for gravity, G; for magnetism, there was an additional constant Km; and for light, there was the speed of light, known since 1630 to be 3 × 108 m/s. Surely many physicists wondered whether these constants and the forces they represent are somehow related.
The Mechanical Universe is a project that encompasses fifty-two half-hour television programs, two textbooks in four volumes (including this one), teachers' manuals, specially edited videotapes for high school use, and much more. It seems safe to say that nothing quite like it has been attempted in physics (or any other subject) before. A few words about how all this came to be seem to be in order.
Caltech's dedication to the teaching of physics began fifty years ago with a popular introductory textbook written by Robert Millikan, Earnest Watson, and Duanc Roller. Millikan, whose exploits are celebrated in Chapter 12 of this book, was Caltech's founder, president, first Nobel prizewinner, and all-around patron saint. Earnest Watson was dean of the faculty, and both he and Duane Roller were distinguished teachers.
Twenty years ago, the introductory physics courses at Caltech were taught by Richard Feynman, who is not only a scientist of historic proportions, but also a dramatic and highly entertaining lecturer. Feynman's words were lovingly recorded, transcribed, and published in a series of three volumes that have become genuine and indispensable classics of the science literature.
The teaching of physics at Caltcch, like the teaching of science courses everywhere, is constantly undergoing transition. Caltech's latest effort to infuse new life in freshman physics was instituted by Professor David Goodstein and eventually led to the creation of The Mechanical Universe.
It is amazing! Although I had as yet no clear idea of the order in which the perfect solids had to be arranged, I nevertheless succeeded … in arranging them so happily, that later on. when I checked the matter over, I had nothing to alter. Now I no longer regretted the lost time; I no longer tired of my works; I shied from no computation, however difficult. Day and night I spent with calculations to see whether the proposition that i had formulated tallied with the Copernican orbits or whether my joy would be carried away by the winds…. Within a few days everything fell into its place. I saw one symmetrical solid after the other fit in so precisely between the appropriate orbits, that if a peasant were to ask you on what kind of hook the heavens are fastened so that they don't fall down, it would be easy for thee to answer him. Farewell!
Johannes Kepler, Preface to Mysterium Cosmographicum (1596)
THE SEARCH FOR ORDER
In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, that brilliant awakening known as the Renaissance was brought to an end as Europe turned its attention to a spirited debate on the finer points of Christian theology. This period, known as the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, culminated in the bloody Thirty Years' War (1618–48).
At that time, three individuals devoted to physics and astronomy laid the foundations for the enormous scientific achievements of Isaac Newton.
In the center of all the celestial bodies rests the sun. For who could in this most beautiful temple place this lamp in another or better place than that from which it can illuminate everything at the same time? Indeed, it is not unsuitable that some have called it the light of the world; others, its mind, and still others, its ruler. Trismegistus calls it the visible God; Sophocles' Electra, the all-seeing. So indeed, as if sitting on a royal throne, the Sun rules the family of the stars which surround it.
Nicolaus Copernicus, De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (1543)
THE COPERNICAN REVOLUTION
We find it difficult to imagine the frame of mind of people who once firmly believed the earth to be the immovable center of the universe, with all the heavenly bodies revolving harmoniously around it. It is ironic that this view, inherited from the Middle Ages and handed down by the Greeks, particularly Greek thought frozen in the writings of Plato and Aristotle, was one designed to illustrate our insignificance amid the grand scheme of the universe – even while we resided at its center.
Aristotle's world consisted of four fundamental elements – fire, air, water, and earth – and each element was inclined to seek its own natural place. Flame leapt through air, bubbles rose in water, rain fell from the heavens, and rocks fell to earth: the world was ordered.
You see, therefore, that living force [kinetic energy] may be converted into heat, and that heat may be converted into living force, or its equivalent attraction through space. All three, therefore – namely, heat, living force, and attraction through space (to which I might also add light, were it consistent with the scope of the present lecture) – are mutually convertible into one another. In these conversions nothing is ever lost. The same quantity of heat will always be converted into the same quantity of living force. We can therefore express the equivalency in definite language applicable at all times and under all circumstances.
James Prescott Joule. “On Matter, Living Force, and Heat” (1847)
And in each of these decades [the 1950s and 1960s] more oil was consumed than in all of man's previous history combined.
President Jimmy Carter (18 April 1977)
TOWARD AN IDEA OF ENERGY
The law of conservation of energy is a fundamental law of physics. No matter what you do, energy is always conserved. The total amount of energy in the universe is, has been, and always will be the same as it is right now. So why do people tell us to conserve energy? Evidently the phrase conserve energy has one meaning to a scientist and quite a different meaning to other peopie, for example, to the president of a utility company or to a politician. What then, exactly, is energy?
A prominent literary writer, I think it was Chesterton, once spoke of the electron as “only the latest hypothesis which will in its turn give way to the abra-ca-da-bra of tomorrow.” This sort of ignorance will disappear in time, just as will Kipling's “village that voted the earth was flat, flat as my hat, flatter than that:” In any case, the most direct and unambiguous proof of the existence of the electron will probably be generally admitted to be found in the oil-drop experiment here under discussion.
Robert A. Millikan, Autobiography (1950)
THE DISCOVERY OF THE ELECTRON
In the 1890s physicists were puzzled by cathode rays, by glowing gases, and by applegreen fluorescence that appeared in their investigations of light. To study the light emitted by various elements, researchers had developed a specially designed glass apparatus called the cathode-ray tube. To two pieces of metal, called the cathode and anode, which pass through the tube, would be connected a powerful electric voltage as illustrated in Fig. 12.1. When the gas was at atmospheric pressure, nothing happened, but when the pressure was reduced to one-hundredth of atmospheric pressure, the gas began to glow. The end of the tube near the anode glowed, or fluoresced, with an eerie green color, except where a shadow of the anode appeared. Evidently, the cathode emitted mysterious rays – cathode rays – that streamed from the cathode to the anode. Some of these rays hit the glass, creating the green light, but others were blocked by the anode, creating a shadow.
Then from these forces, by other propositions which are also mathematical, I deduce the motions of the planets, the comets, the moon, and the sea. I wish we could derive the rest of the phenomena of Nature by the same kind of reasoning from mechanical principles, for I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they may alt depend upon certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some cause hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards one another, and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from one another. These forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of Nature in vain, but I hope the principles here laid down will afford some light either to this or some truer method of philosophy.
Isaac Newton. Principia, 1687
THE END OF THE CONFUSION
In 1543, Copernicus published his book, and a tremor rocked the foundations of the Aristotelian worid. A century later the Aristotelian world lay in ruins, but nothing had arisen to replace it, Galileo and Kepler had made mighty discoveries, but there was no central principle that could organize the world. The unified harmony of the Aristotelian view had been replaced by buzzing confusion.
Galileo was concerned not with the causes of motion, but instead with its description. The branch of mechanics he reared is known as kinematics; it is a mathematically descriptive account of motion without concern for the causes.
I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind: it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of science.
Lord Kelvin (1891)
NEWTON AND THE SPEED OF SOUND
At any given moment in the development of physics, there are certain experiments or measurements that are just barely possible. These are not the most difficult experiments we can imagine, but they are the most difficult experiments that one can effect with existing equipment. These experiments become a challenge to the artistry and imagination of the most gifted experimenters. A typical example today might be the detection of gravity waves. Toward the end of the seventeenth century, one such state-of-the-art experiment was to measure the speed of sound.
Sound is some sort of disturbance that most often travels to our ears through air. Sound also travels through liquids and solids, but in any case a medium, that is, a substance, is needed in order for the sound waves to travel. In a vacuum, there is no sound.
I was almost driven to madness in considering and calculating the matter. I could not find out why the planet [Mars] would rather go on an ellipitical orbit. Oh ridiculous me! As if the libration on the diameter could not also be the way to the ellipse. So this notion brought me up short, that the ellipse exists because of the libration. With reasoning derived from physical principles agreeing with experience, there is no figure left for the orbit of the planet except for a perfect ellipse.…
Why should I mince my words? The truth of Nature, which I had rejected and chased away, returned by stealth through the back door, disguising itself to be accepted. That is to say, I laid [the original equation] aside, and fell back on ellipses, believing that this was a quite different hypothesis, whereas the two, as I shall prove in the next chapter, are one and the same… I thought and searched, until I went nearly mad, for a reason why the planet preferred an elliptical orbit… Ah, what a foolish bird I have been!
Johannes Kepler, Astronomia Nova (1609)
THE QUEST FOR PRECISION
Not long after Copernicus published his revolutionary book, Tycho Brahe (1546–1601) provided a multitude of new observations that, despite his own intentions, provided crucial support for the Copernican hypothesis.
Therefore, during the whole time of their appearance, comets fall within the sphere of activity of the circumsolar force, and hence are acted upon by its impulse and therefore (by Corollary 1. Proposition XII) describe conic sections that have their foci in the center of the sun, and by radii drawn from the sun describe areas proportional to the times. For that force propagated to an immense distance, will govern the motions of the bodies far beyond the orbit of Saturn.
Isaac Newton, Principia (1687)
CELESTIAL OMENS: COMETS
Ancient astronomers earned their keep and kept their heads by making accurate predictions of the arrival of the seasons and of such troubling ceiestiai events as solar and lunar eclipses. As their technical expertise improved, astronomers learned to predict even the wandering motion of the planets. Yet at times, interlopers, such as meteors, appeared in the night sky. Although meteors seemed as unpredictable as the weather (and were thought to be related to it, which is why their name shares the same Greek root with the science of weather – meteorology), even meteor showers were observed to occur regularly. For example, the most spectacular meteor showers occur every year in mid-August.
Nevertheless, objects occasionally and mysteriously appeared in the heavens which were not planets or meteors. Trailing plumes of cold fire, these objects were named comets, from the Greek word meaning thing with hair. Because their appearance was unpredictable, comets were interpreted as omens of impending disaster.