Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T06:44:25.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Workers’ rights and transatlantic trade relations: The TTIP and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Aneta Tyc
Aneta Tyc*
Affiliation:
University of Łódź, Poland
*
Aneta Tyc, Department of Labour Law, University of Łódź, Kopcińskiego 8/12, 90-232 Łódź, Poland. Email: anetatyc85@o2.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of the working-class backlash against free trade represented by Brexit, the recent surge of right-wing political parties in Europe and the 2016 US presidential election, it is timely to take stock of the threats to jobs and wages posed by recent negotiations over the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The European Commission selectively relied on econometric analyses, predicting a positive impact of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Its proposed legal text on ‘Trade and sustainable development’ fell short of the European Parliament’s negotiating guidelines, which themselves failed to ensure protection of labour standards. The activities of corporate lobbies threatened the effective protection of workers’ rights. Major risks to workers’ rights are posed by discrepancies between US and European Union labour and social law and labour standards. The most recent legal text lacks compliance monitoring provisions and sanction mechanisms against member states failing to ratify core labour conventions. The investment court system does not resolve the problems of the discredited investor-state dispute settlement mechanism for which it is the proposed replacement. The year 2016 has provided a foretaste of the dislocation likely from trade and investment regulation that sees social and environmental standards and labour rights simply as barriers to corporate profits.

Keywords

F13F16F21F23F66J83K33Enforcement of standardslabour rightslabour standardstrade agreementstrade policyTransatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Type
Workers and neoliberalism
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 113 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhtar, SI, Jones, VC (2013) Proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): in brief. Current Politics and Economics of Europe 24(1–2): 107–122.Google Scholar
Baker, D (2014) The risks of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Intereconomics 49(3): 179–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berden, KG, Francois, J, Thelle, M, et al., et al (2009) Non-Tariff Measures in EU-US Trade and Investment – An Economic Analysis. Rotterdam: ECORYS Nederland BV. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/december/tradoc_145613.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Best, MC, McGrory, M, Pronk, A, et al . (2015) The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: a classical community method-driven economic integration process. Economia & Lavoro 2: 63–75.Google Scholar
Bickel, B (2015) Harmonizing regulations in the financial services industry through the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Emory International Law Review 29(3): 557–587.Google Scholar
Bogg, A, Ewing, KD (2015) Freedom of association. In: Finkin, MW, Mundlak, G (eds) Comparative Labor Law. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 296–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolle, MJ (2016) Overview of labor enforcement issues in free trade agreements. Congressional Research Service report prepared for Members and Committees of Congress, 22 February. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22823.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Botsford, P (2015) International trade: focus increases on TTIP dispute mechanism. IBA Global Insight 69(2): 4.Google Scholar
Bronstein, A (2009) International and Comparative Labour Law: Current Challenges. Geneva: Palgrave Macmillan, International Labour Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, RT (2015) Public participation and the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. The George Washington Law Review 83(4–5): 1262–1293.Google Scholar
Burtless, G, Lawrence, RZ, Litan, RE, et al . (2010) Globaphobia: Confronting Fears about Open Trade. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Cagnin, V (2015) What future for social rights under the new Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)? Some reflections on TTIP. Economia & Lavoro 2: 77–86.Google Scholar
Capaldo, J (2015) The TransAtlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: European disintegration, unemployment and instability. Economia & Lavoro 2: 35–56.Google Scholar
Celi, G (2015) How beneficial is TTIP for EU countries? Economic gains and social costs of an ambitious project. Economia & Lavoro 2: 11–34.Google Scholar
Cody, J (2015) How US labour can still defeat the Trans-Pacific partnership. Global Labour Column (Number 218), 23 November. Available at: http://column.global-labour-university.org/2015/11/how-us-labour-can-still-defeat-trans.html (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Colantone, I, Stanig, P (2016) The real reason the U.K. voted for Brexit? Jobs lost to Chinese competition. The Washington Post, 7 July. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/07/07/the-real-reason-the-u-k-voted-for-brexit-economics-not-identity/?utm_term=.c725287729da (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Compa, L (2015) Labor rights and labor standards in transatlantic trade and investment negotiations: a US perspective. Economia & Lavoro 2: 87–102.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union (2014) Directives for the negotiation on a comprehensive trade and investment agreement, called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, between the European Union and the United States of America (Declassified 17 June 2013), Brussels, 9 October. Available at: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11103-2013-DCL-1/en/pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Deutsche Richterbund (DRB) (2016) Opinion on the establishment of an investment tribunal in TTIP – the proposal from the European Commission on 16.09.2015 and 11.12.2015. DRB-Stellungnahme Nr. 04/16. Available at: http://ttip2016.eu/files/content/docs/Full%20documents/english_version_deutsche_richterbund_opinion_ics_feb2016.pdf (accessed 26 June 2016).Google Scholar
De Ville, F, Siles-Brügge, G (2016) What does Brexit mean for TTIP? EurActiv.com, 14 July. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/opinion/what-does-brexit-mean-for-ttip/ (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
De Ville, F, Orbie, J, Van den Putte, L (2016) TTIP and labour standards: Study for the EMPL committee (Directorate-General for Internal Policy, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy), June. European Parliament. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/578992/IPOL_STU(2016)578992_EN.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Di Pietro, M (2015) Il TTIP (Partenariato transatlantico per il commercio e gli investimenti) e la cooperazione normativa. Economia & Lavoro 2: 121–130.Google Scholar
Easton, N (2014) Democrats love free trade. but they love big labor even more. Fortune 169(7): 74.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, P (2016) Investment Court System (ICS): the wolf in sheep’s clothing. The EU’s great corporate privilege rebrand. Available at: http://www.world-psi.org/sites/default/files/documents/research/en_wolfics_hd.pdf (accessed 3 January 2017).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2015a) EU textual proposal: trade and sustainable development. Tabled 19–23 October, made public 6 November. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/november/tradoc_153923.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2015b) Reading guide to the draft text on investment protection and investment court system in the transatlantic trade and investment partnership, 16 September. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1365 (accessed 11 March 2016).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2015c) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: trade in services, investment and e-commerce, Chapter II – investment, made public 12 November. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/november/tradoc_153955.pdf (accessed 1 July 2016).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2016a) Report of the 12th round of negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), Brussels, 22–26 February. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/march/tradoc_154391.pdf (accessed 28 June 2016).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2016b) Report of the 13th round of negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, New York, 25–29 April. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/may/tradoc_154581.pdf (accessed 28 June 2016).Google Scholar
European Parliament (2015) European Parliament resolution of 8 July 2015 containing the European Parliament’s recommendations to the European Commission on the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (2014/2228(INI)). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0252+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed 28 June 2016).Google Scholar
European Trade Union Confederation and the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (ETUC/AFL-CIO) (2014) TTIP must work for the people, or it won’t work at all, Declaration of Joint Principles. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/document/files/afl-cio_ttip_report_uk_1.pdf (accessed 4 January 2017).Google Scholar
Ewing, KD (2015) The death of social Europe. King’s Law Journal 26(1): 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faioli, M (2015) The quest for a new generation of labor chapter in the TTIP. Economia & Lavoro 2: 103–120.Google Scholar
Farrell, S (2016) France demands an end to TTIP talks. The Guardian, 30 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/aug/30/france-demands-end-to-ttip-trade-talks-matthias-fekl (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Felbermayr, G, Heid, B, Lehwald, S (2013) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Who Benefits from a Free Trade Deal? Part 1: Macroeconomic Effects. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. Available at: http://www.bfna.org/sites/default/files/TTIP-GED%20study%2017June%202013.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Fontagné, L, Gourdon, J, Jean, S (2013) Transatlantic trade: whither partnership, which economic consequences? CEPII – Policy brief no. 1, September. Paris: Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales. Available at: http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/pb/2013/pb2013-01.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Francois, J, Manchin, M, Norberg, H, et al., et al (2013) Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment: An Economic Assessment. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/march/tradoc_150737.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Fung, TS (2014) Negotiating regulatory coherence: the costs and consequences of disparate regulatory principles in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreement between the United States and the European Union. Cornell International Law Journal 47(2): 445–471.Google Scholar
Hamilton, DS (2014) Transatlantic challenges: Ukraine, TTIP and the struggle to be strategic. Journal of Common Market Studies 52: 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, H (2014) 10 reasons to be worried about the trojan treaties. New Internationalist (issue 472), May. Available at: https://newint.org/features/2014/05/01/trojan-treaties/ (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Healy, H (2015) Toxic lobby. New Internationalist (issue 485), 8 September. Available at: http://1.droppdf.com/files/eqxS7/new-internationalist-september-2015.pdf (accessed 25 January 2017).Google Scholar
Jasper, WF (2013) EU/U.S. – transatlantic convergence. New American 29(17): 38–42.Google Scholar
Johnson, D (2016) The damage from free trade helped elect Trump. The Huffington Post, 9 November. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson/the-damage-from-free-trad_b_12889048.html (accessed 20 December 2016).Google Scholar
Kordos, M (2014) Issues and challenges of the US – EU economic relations. Economics and Management 19(1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraatz, S (2014) The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and labour (Economic and Social Affairs, Policy Department A: Economy and Scientific Policy: Briefing). PE 536.315, November. European Parliament. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2014/536315/IPOL_BRI(2014)536315_EN.pdf (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Lee, TM (2015) TTIP must protect jobs, workers and public services. Intereconomics 6: 317–327.Google Scholar
Liptáková, J (2015) Slegers: setting global standards with TTIP. The Slovak Spectator 21(14): 7–9.Google Scholar
Matthews, D (2013) Negotiating the IP chapter of an EU–US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: let’s not repeat past mistakes. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 44(5): 491–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosca, A, Bordonaro, V (2015) Il Parlamento e la nuova politica commerciale: riflessi transatlantici. Economia & Lavoro 2: 131–141.Google Scholar
Oltermann, P (2016) Obama and Merkel call for continued transatlantic cooperation. The Guardian, 17 November. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/16/barack-obama-and-angela-merkel-call-for-continued-transatlantic-cooperation (accessed 24 December 2016).Google Scholar
Osling, AW (2010) Intellectual Property Rights and International Trade. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Roberts, D, Felton, R (2016) Trump and Clinton’s free trade retreat: a pivotal moment for the world’s economic future. The Guardian, 21 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/20/trump-clinton-free-trade-policies-tpp (accessed 24 December 2014).Google Scholar
Schott, JJ, Cimino, C (2013) Keys to negotiating the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Intereconomics 48(4): 263–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonazzi, A, Faioli, M (2015) Introduction. Economia & Lavoro 2: 7–10.Google Scholar
Stephan, S (2015) Is TTIP a growth and employment engine for Southern Europe? Economia & Lavoro 2: 57–61.Google Scholar
Trades Unions Congress (TUC) (2016) TTIP, social rights and labour standards – speech by Steve Turner, TUC spokesperson on Europe. Available at: https://www.tuc.org.uk/international-issues/ttip-social-rights-and-labour-standards-speech-steve-turner-tuc-spokesperson (accessed 26 June 2016).Google Scholar
Tourkochoriti, I (2014) The Snowden Revelations, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the divide between U.S.-EU in data privacy protection. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review 36(2): 161–176.Google Scholar
Treu, T (2015) Postfazione. Economia & Lavoro 2: 143–155.Google Scholar
Trumka, R (2016) TPP: a new low. The Hill 23(10): 18.Google Scholar
UNI Europa (2016) EU’s investment Court System in TTIP and CETA does not protect governments’ right to regulate, 20 April. Available at: http://www.uni-europa.org/2016/04/20/eus-investment-court-system-ttip-ceta-not-protect-governments-right-regulate/ (accessed 26 June 2016).Google Scholar
Van Roozendaal, G (2015) The diffusion of labour standards: the case of the US and Guatemala. Politics and Governance 3(2): 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, JS (2015) The evolution of labor rights and trade – a transatlantic comparison and lessons for the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. Journal of International Economic Law 18(4): 827–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walls, HL, Smith, RD, Drahos, P (2015) Improving regulatory capacity to manage risks associated with trade agreements. Globalization and Health 11: 14. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376330/pdf/12992_2015_Article_99.pdf (accessed 21 December 2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, M (2014) The proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): ISDS provisions, reconciliation, and future trade implications. Emory International Law Review 29(1): 225–275.Google Scholar