Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T08:47:53.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precarious work and intrinsic job quality: Evidence from Finland, 1984–2013

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Pasi Pyöriä  and
Satu Ojala
Pasi Pyöriä*
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Finland
Satu Ojala
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Finland
*
Pasi Pyöriä, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere, Tampere FI-33014, Finland. Email: pasi.pyoria@uta.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is often argued that job insecurity and precarious work are on the rise. However, the evidence to back these arguments remains mixed and inconclusive. In this study, we define and measure precarious work in Finland using five variables that reflect both objective and subjective insecurity: atypical employment, actually experienced unemployment, the threat of dismissal or unemployment, poor chances of finding a new job, and low earnings. Results based on Statistics Finland’s Quality of Work Life Surveys from 1984 to 2013 indicate that, from a labour market or forms of employment perspective, the proportion of precarious wage earners has increased from 11% in 1984 to 13% in 2013. From a second perspective, however, focusing on changing working conditions, growing inequality and eroding social security mechanisms, we also analyse how a precarious labour market position is related to intrinsic job quality. Precarious workers experience decreased levels of skill and discretion, and they work in a less supportive environment than other employees.

Keywords

Atypical employmentjob insecurityjob qualityprecarious workqualificationsskillsunemploymentwork intensityJ21J24J31J64J81
Type
Rethinking Precariousness and Flexibility
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 349 - 367
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chan, S (2013) ‘I am king’: financialisation and the paradox of precarious work. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3): 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, GHL and Chan, DKS (2008) Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Applied Psychology 57(2): 272–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bustillo, RF, Fernández-Macías, E, Antón, J-I, et al . (2011) Measuring More than Money: The Social Economics of Job Quality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, J (2015) An Income of One’s Own? The Political Analysis of Universal Basic Income. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D, Hänninen, S, Siisiäinen, M, et al . (eds) (2015) The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doogan, K (2009) New Capitalism? The Transformation of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Doogan, K (2015) Precarity – Minority condition or majority experience? In: Della Porta, D, Hänninen, S, Siisiäinen, M, et al . (eds) The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Eurofound (2012) Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Eurofound (2015) 3rd European Company Survey – Overview Report: Workplace Practices – Patterns, Performance and Well-Being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Commission (2004) Precarious Employment in Europe: A Comparative Study of Labour Market Related Risks in Flexible Economies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Fevre, R (2007) Employment insecurity and social theory: the power of nightmares. Work, Employment & Society 21(3): 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, D (2008) Task discretion and job quality. In: Gallie, D (ed.) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–136.Google Scholar
Green, F (2006) Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, F and Mostafa, T (2012) Trends in Job Quality in Europe: A Report Based on the Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2012) From Precarious Work to Decent Work: Outcome Document to the Workers’ Symposium on Policies and Regulations to Combat Precarious Employment. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Jokinen, E (2016) Precarious everyday agency. European Journal of Cultural Studies 19(1): 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalela, J, Kiander, J, Kivikuru, U, et al . (eds) (2001) Down from the Heavens, up from the Ashes: The Finnish Economic Crisis of the 1990s in the Light of Economic and Social Research. Helsinki: VATT – Government Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, AL (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, AL (2012) Job quality and precarious work: clarifications, controversies, and challenges. Work and Occupations 39(4): 427–448.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, AL (2014) Measuring precarious work. Working paper of the EINet Measurement group, University of Chicago School of Social Service Administration, Chicago, IL, November.Google Scholar
Karasek, R and Theorell, T (1990) Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kauhanen, M and Nätti, J (2015) Involuntary temporary and part-time work, job quality and well-being at work. Social Indicators Research 120(3): 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liukkonen, V (2012) Non-Standard Employment and Health with Respect to Sense of Coherence and Social Capital. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Employment and the Economy (2010) Finland’s Regional Development Strategy 2020. Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and the Economy.Google Scholar
Ministry of Employment and the Economy (2012) Finnish Labour Legislation and Industrial Relations. Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and the Economy.Google Scholar
Moulier-Boutang, Y (2012) Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Neilson, B and Rossiter, N (2008) Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society 25(7–8): 51–72.Google Scholar
Oinas, T, Anttila, T, Mustosmäki, A, et al . (2012) The Nordic difference: job quality in Europe 1995–2010. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 2(4): 135–152.Google Scholar
Ojala, S and Pyöriä, P (2015) Working around the clock? – The time and location of paid work in Finland, 1979–2010. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research 12(1): 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsthoorn, M (2014) Measuring precarious employment: a proposal for two indicators of precarious employment based on set-theory and tested with Dutch labor market-data. Social Indicators Research 119(1): 421–441.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2014) How’s Life in Finland? OECD Better Life Initiative. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Puig-Barrachina, V, Vanroelen, C, Vives, A, et al . (2014) Measuring employment precariousness in the European Working Conditions Survey: the social distribution in Europe. Work 49(1): 143–161.Google ScholarPubMed
Pyöriä, P, Melin, H and Blom, R (2005) Knowledge Workers in the Information Society: Evidence from Finland. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Quinlan, M (2012) The ‘pre-invention’ of precarious employment: the changing world of work in context. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 23(4): 3–24.Google Scholar
Rodgers, G and Rodgers, J (eds) (1989) Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Rokkanen, M and Uusitalo, R (2013) Changes in job stability – Evidence from lifetime job histories. Finnish Economic Papers 26(2): 36–55.Google Scholar
Ruostetsaari, I (2015) Elite Recruitment and Coherence of the Inner Core of Power in Finland: Changing Patterns during the Economic Crises of 1991–2011. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Siegrist, J, Starkea, D, Chandolab, T, et al . (2004) The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine 58(8): 1483–1499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soininen, T (2015) Changing Expectations and Realities of Employment Stability – Longitudinal Analysis on Tenures in Finland. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.Google Scholar
Standing, G (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sutela, H and Lehto, A-M (2014) Työolojen muutokset 1977–2013 [Changes in Working Conditions 1977–2013]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
Sverke, M and Hellgren, J (2002) The nature of job insecurity: understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Applied Psychology 51(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Tompa, E, Scott-Marshall, H, Dolinschi, R, et al . (2007) Precarious employment experiences and their health consequences: towards a theoretical framework. Work 28(3): 209–224.Google ScholarPubMed
Vosko, LF (2010) Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, S and Ebert, N (2013) Precarious work: economic, sociological and political perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3): 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar