Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:16:21.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour agency in the future of work: Shenzhen’s maker community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Bingqing Xia Open the ORCID record for Bingqing Xia [Opens in a new window]
Bingqing Xia*
Affiliation:
East China Normal University, China
*
Bingqing Xia, School of Communication, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China. Email: bqxia@comm.ecnu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since emerging around 2010, maker culture and the maker movement have drawn little attention from digital labour research. This article fills the gap by exploring sociocultural dynamics that have emerged in maker culture, such as how makers in China mobilise their agency to struggle for a path forward to achieve decent work and a better society. The article first reviews research on the Chinese maker community as well as digital labour, in particular the dualism of exploitation and workplace resistance in current digital labour research. It argues that makers, in the case studied, mobilise certain agency initiating from sociocultural dynamics beyond the framework of exploitation. The article then explicates the argument with cases collected from our fieldwork in Shenzhen’s maker community in July–August 2017. It shows makers’ practices originating from the open-source ethos, such as an awareness of sharing and mutual support in moulding a ‘micro-innovation’ model, and in creating products that aim to benefit vulnerable communities and build up a sustainable ecosystem. The article thus turns the current economic discussion on maker culture in a new direction: the sociocultural impact of the maker movement. Furthermore, it suggests that this research on the sociocultural impact fills the gap between existing digital labour research and maker studies.

Keywords

H49O3Z1Digital labourlabour agencylabour process theorymakeropen-sourcesociocultural dynamics
Type
New work forms
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 484 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbassi, W, Harmel, A, Belkahla, W, et al. (2021) Maker movement contribution to fighting COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Tunisian Fablabs. R & D Management 52(2): 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackroyd, S and Thompson, P (2016) Unruly subjects: Misbehaviour in the workplace. In: Edgell, S, Hottfried, H and Granter, E (eds) The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment. London: Sage Publications, pp. 185–204.Google Scholar
Anderson, C (2012) Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. London: Random House Business.Google Scholar
Anwar, MA and Graham, M (2020) Digital labour at economic margins: African workers and the global information economy. Review of African Political Economy 47(163): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M (2007) The Politics of Cultural Work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M (2010) Autonomy guaranteed? Cultural work and the ‘art-commerce relation’. Journal for Cultural Research 14(3): 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbrook, R (1998/2005) The hi-tech gift economy. First Monday 3(12). Epub ahead of print 7 December 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v3i12.631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J, Furrer, M, Harmon, E, et al. (2019) Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Callinicos, A (2004) Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerini, M (2015) DIY nation: China’s new wave of young innovators. That’s Magazine. Available at: http://www.thatsmags.com/china/post/8675/diy-nation-the-fast-growing-world-of-chinas-hackerspace-communities (accessed 1 September 2017).Google Scholar
Constine, J (2019) Maker faire halts operations and lays off all staff. Techcrunch, 8 June. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/07/make-magazine-maker-media-layoffs/ (accessed 20 July 2019).Google Scholar
Corsini, L, Dammicco, V and Moultrie, J (2021) Frugal innovation in a crisis: The digital fabrication maker response to COVID-19. R &D Management 51(2): 195–210.Google Scholar
Doussard, M, Schrock, G, Wolf-Powers, L, et al. (2018) Manufacturing without the firm: Challenges for the maker movement in three U.S. cities. Environment and Planning A 50(3): 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, J, Kaletka, C, Pelka, B, et al. (2021) Gender in the making: An empirical approach to understand gender relations in the market movement. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 145: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderle, G and Murphy, P (2015) Ethical Innovation in Business and the Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallows, J (2016) Why the Maker movement matters: Part 1 – The tools revolution. The Atlantic, 6 June. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/why-the-maker-movement-matters-part-1-the-tools-revolution/485720/ (accessed 1 September 2017).Google Scholar
Florida, R (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York, NY: Basic books.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C (2015) Dallas Smythe and digital labor. In: Maxwell, R (ed.) Routledge Companion to Labor and Media. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C and Sandoval, M (2014) Digital workers of the world unite! A framework for critically theorizing and analyzing digital labour. Communication, Capitalism and Critique 12(2): 486–563.Google Scholar
Gandini, A (2021) Digital labour: An empty signifier? Media, Culture & Society 43(2): 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, R (2002) Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe. Information, Communication and Society 5(1): 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M, Hjorth, I and Lehdonvirta, V (2017) Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23(2): 135–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammersley, M and Atkinson, P (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardt, M and Negri, A (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, M and Negri, A (2005) Multitude. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heeks, R, Eskelund, K, Gómez-Morantes, JE, et al. (2020) Digital labour platforms in the global south: Filling or creating institutional voids? Digital Development Working Paper 86. Manchester: Centre for Digital Development, Global Development Institute, University of Manchester. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3645389 (accessed 1 March 2022).Google Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D (2010) User-generated content, free labour and the cultural industries. Ephemera 10(3/4): 267–284.Google Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D and Baker, S (2010) Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodson, R (2001) Dignity at Work. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iinuma, K (2000) From imitation to creativity. In: Inkster, I and Satofuka, F (eds) Culture and Technology in Modern Japan. London and New York, NY: I.B Tauris, pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H (2006) Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, M and Zhao, EJ (2013) Renegades on the frontier of innovation: The shanzhai grassroots communities of Shenzhen in China’s creative economy. Eurasian Geography and Economics 53(2): 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, H (2012) Net Work: Ethics and Values in Web Design. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Q, Yin, Y, Tang, X, et al. (2020) Assessing learning in technology-rich maker activities: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers and Education 157: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindtner, S (2014) Hackerspaces and the Internet of Things in China: How makers are reinventing industrial production, innovation, and the self. China Information 28(2): 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindtner, S, Greenspan, A and Li, D (2015) Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai manufacturing and maker entrepreneurs. In: Proceeding of the fifth decennial Aarhus conference on critical alternatives, Aarhus, Denmark, pp.85–96.Google Scholar
Lindtner, S and Li, D (2012) Created in China: The makings of China’s hackerspace community. Interactions 19(6): 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X, Xie, Y and Wu, M (2015) How latecomers innovate through technology modularization: Evidence from China’s shanzhai industry. Innovation 17(2): 266–280.Google Scholar
McKercher, C and Mosco, V (2008) Knowledge workers in the information society. Lanham, Plymouth: Lexington books.Google Scholar
McRobbie, A (2016) Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mengoni, L (2015) From Shenzhen: Shanzhai and the Maker movement. Available at: http://www.vam.ac.uk/shekou/from-shenzhen-shanzhai-and-the-maker-movement/ (accessed 22 July 2019).Google Scholar
Mengoni, L (2016) The pirates and the Makers/Shanzhai. Available at: http://www.vam.ac.uk/shekou/uaod-part-7-the-pirates-and-the-makers-shanzhai/ (accessed 22 July 2019).Google Scholar
Muirhead, R (2004) Just Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Doherty, D and Willmott, H (2001) Debating labour process theory: The issue of subjectivity and the relevance of poststructuralism. Sociology 35(2): 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rani, U and Furrer, M (2021) Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: Algorithmic management of work and workers. Competition & Change 25(2) 212–236.Google Scholar
Ren, X (2016) Copyright, media and modernization in China: A historical review, 1890–2015. Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture 7(3): 311–326.Google Scholar
Rosa, P, Ferretti, F and Pereira, A (2017) Overview of the Maker Movement in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Rosa, P, Pereira, A and Ferretti, F (2018) Futures of Work: Perspectives from the Maker Movement. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Ross, A (2012) In search of the lost paycheck. In Scholz, T (ed.) Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.13–32.Google Scholar
Saunders, T and Kingsley, J (2016) Made in China: Makerspaces and the search for mass innovation. NESTA. Available at: https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/made_in_china-_makerspaces_report.pdf (accessed 22 July 2019).Google Scholar
Schad, M and Jones, W (2019) The maker movement and education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 52(1): 148–164.Google Scholar
Schmidt, FA (2017) Digital labour markets in the platform economy: Mapping the political challenges of crowd work and gig work. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/13164.pdf (accessed 2 July 2021).Google Scholar
Scholz, T (2014) Platform cooperativism vs. the sharing economy. Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@trebors/platform-cooperativism-vs-the-sharing-economy-2ea737f-1b5ad#.moyp7dbht (accessed 15 June 2021).Google Scholar
Smythe, D (1977) Communications: Blindspot of western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 1(3): 1–27.Google Scholar
Standing, G (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stangler, D and Maxwell, K (2012) DIY producer society. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 7(3): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terranova, T (2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
The Economist (2021) A confident China seeks to insulate itself from the world. Available at: https://www.economist.com/china/2021/03/13/a-confident-china-seeks-to-insulate-itself-from-the-world (accessed 12 March 2021).Google Scholar
Thompson, C (2015) How a nation of tech copycats transformed into a hub for innovation. The Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2015/12/tech-innovation-in-china/ (accessed 1 September 2017).Google Scholar
Thompson, P (2016) Dissent at work and the resistance debate: Departures, directions, and dead ends. Studies in Political Economy 97(2): 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P and Newsome, K (2016) The dynamics of dignity at work. In: Keister, L and Roscigno, V (eds) A Gedenkschrift to Randy Hodson: Working with Dignity. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp.79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, W (2017) Making in China: Is maker culture changing China’s creative landscape? International Journal of Cultural Studies 20(4): 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, K and Petrich, M (2014) The Art of Tinkering. San Francisco, CA: Weldon Owen.Google Scholar
Wood, S (2021) North Bay Maker Faire founder Sherry Huss helps connect businesses, customers. The North Bay Business Journal, 6 September. Available at: https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/article/article/north-bay-maker-faire-founder-sherry-huss-helps-connect-businesses-custome/ (accessed 10 September 2021).Google Scholar
Xia, B (2014) Digital labour in the new media sweatshop. Communication, Capitalism & Critique 12(2): 668–693.Google Scholar
Yang, X, Sun, L and Lee, R (2016) Micro-innovation strategy: the case of WeChat. Asian Case Research Journal 20(2): 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar