One criticism was that the 12-month follow-up failed to capture a true
clinical picture, and that more time was necessary to demonstrate their
worth. The team that carried out this original work have now published
3-year data on 330 individuals detained under section of the Mental Health
Act,1 randomised on discharge to CTO or voluntary status via
Section 17 leave. No improvements in readmission rates, time to first
readmission, or duration of readmissions were found for those placed on
CTOs. The findings are even more powerful than the original results; CTOs
now exist in various forms in over 75 jurisdictions, but no solid scientific
evidence has yet been produced to support them. If there are subpopulations
for whom (or specific circumstances in which) they work, such
characteristics have yet to be delineated. A ‘least restrictive’ principle
underpins the Mental Health Act, and a strong rebuttal is needed to justify
ongoing CTO use – so-called ‘revolving-door patients' should not be replaced
by revolving-door policy.