Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:01:39.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Is the Timing of Eating Relevant for Weight Loss?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2025

Alan Flanagan*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom Section of Chronobiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom NNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition & Health, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, United Kingdom
*
Lead contact and correspondence: Alan Flanagan, email: alan.flanagan@surrey.ac.uk

Abstract

The potential influence of the timing of eating on body weight regulation in humans has attracted substantial research interest. This review aims to critically evaluate the evidence on timed eating for weight loss, considering energetic and behavioural components to the timing of eating in humans. It has been hypothesised that timed eating interventions may alter energy balance in favour of weight loss by enhancing energy expenditure, specifically the thermic effect of food. This energetic effect has been suggested to explain greater weight loss which has been observed with certain timed eating interventions, despite comparable self-reported energy intakes to control diets. However, timed eating interventions have little impact on total daily energy expenditure, and the apparent effect of time of day on the thermic effect of food largely represents an artefact of measurement methods that fail to account for underlying circadian variation in resting metabolic rate. Differences in weight loss observed in free-living interventions are more likely explainable by real differences in energy intake, notwithstanding similar self-reported energy intakes. In addition, the energetic focus tends to overlook the role of behavioural factors influencing the timing of eating, such as appetite regulation chronotype-environment interactions, which may influence energy intake under free-living conditions. Overall, there is scant evidence that timed eating interventions are superior to general energy restriction for weight loss in humans. However, the role of behavioural factors in influencing energy intake may be relevant for adherence to energy-restricted diets, and this aspect remains understudied in human intervention trials.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Authors 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)