Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T15:00:57.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations between the EAT-Lancet Index, food group consumption and Eatwell Guide adherence in UK adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2025

D. Albabtain
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK
R. Fallaize
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK
F. Hwang
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering Section, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6DH, UK
J.A. Lovegrove
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK
M. Weech
Affiliation:
Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The EAT-Lancet Commission’s “Planetary Health Diet” (PHD) aims to optimise population health and environmental sustainability by promoting a plant-forward diet with animal products consumed in moderation(1). The UK’s Eatwell Guide provides recommendations for key nutrients and food groups to achieve a healthy, balanced diet; greater adherence is associated with environmental benefits(2). This secondary analysis examines the relationships between PHD adherence, food group intakes and compliance with the Eatwell Guide in UK adults.

Data from disease-free UK adults aged ≥18 years (n=452) were pooled from five cross- sectional analyses that recorded habitual dietary intake using the eNutri food frequency questionnaire, which generated nutrient and food group data(3). EAT-Lancet Index scores were calculated(4) for each participant then stratified into quartiles (Q), with the highest scores in Q4 (representing greater adherence to the PHD). Adherence to the 9 Eatwell Guide recommendations were determined for each quartile then classified as ‘very low’ (0– 2 recommendations met), ‘low’ (3–4) or ‘intermediate-to-high’ (5–9) (2). ANCOVA (adjusted for sex, age, physical activity, ethnicity, employment status, and body mass index (BMI)) compared the mean daily intakes of 17 food groups across quartiles. If significant, pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction were determined. P values ≤0.01 were considered significant for all.

Study participants had a mean (SD) age of 44 (19) years and a BMI of 25.7 (6.0) kg/m2 and 79.6% were female. Adherence to the Eatwell Guide was very low in Q1 and Q2, low in Q3 and intermediate-to-high in Q4 (where 5 out of the 9 recommendations were met).

Compared to Q1, higher adherence to the PHD (Q4) was associated with higher intakes of ‘fruits and vegetables’ (+408 g/d), ‘pulses’ (+25.0 g/d), ‘whole grains’(+29.2 g/d), ‘nuts and seeds’(+15.8 g/d) ‘plant-based meat alternatives’ (+14.3 g/d) and ‘plant-based dairy alternatives’ (+110 g/d) (all p≤0.001). In contrast, Q4 had lower intakes of ‘eggs’ (-17.0 g/d), ‘potatoes’(-50.5 g/d), ‘poultry’ (-38.1 g/d), ‘red meat’(-40.4 g/d), ‘processed meat’(-22.5 g/d), ‘refined grains’ (-65.0 g/d) and ‘dairy products’ (-110 g/d) relative to Q1 (all p≤0.001). Although intakes of ‘unsaturated fats and oils’ and ‘fish and other seafood’ were highest in Q4, neither was significantly different from the other quartiles.

Greater adherence to the PHD was associated with higher intakes of plant-based foods (including a two-fold higher intake in fruits and vegetables), and lower consumption of animal products, notably a five-fold lower intake of red meat. Moreover, UK adults whose diets more closely reflected the PHD also met a higher proportion of Eatwell Guide recommendations. These findings suggest that closer adherence to the PHD aligns with greater compliance to UK dietary guidelines (Eatwell Guide), reflecting a more favorable dietary pattern.

Information

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Willett, W et al. (2019) Lancet 393(10170), 447492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheelbeek, P et al. (2020) BMJ Open 10(8), e037554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenun, Franco et al. (2022) J Med Internet Res 24(4), e29088.Google Scholar
Stubbendorff, A et al. (2022) Am J Clin Nutr, 115(3), 705716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar