Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-zv5th Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-30T03:18:36.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations between gut microbiota and menopause symptoms: novel insights from the ZOE PREDICT 3 cohort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2025

Curie Kim
Affiliation:
Zoe Ltd, United Kingdom
Francesco Asnicar
Affiliation:
Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Lucy Marples
Affiliation:
Zoe Ltd, United Kingdom
Georgios Pounis
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, United Kingdom
Kate Bermingham
Affiliation:
Zoe Ltd, United Kingdom
Wendy Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, United Kingdom
Nicola Segata
Affiliation:
Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Tim Spector
Affiliation:
Zoe Ltd, United Kingdom Department of Twins Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London, UK
Sarah Berry
Affiliation:
Zoe Ltd, United Kingdom Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Microbiome composition may differ according to menopause status, which may be partially mediated by diet (1). Peri- and post-menopausal symptom burden is associated with diet quality (2), however, knowledge on the association between menopause symptoms and gut microbiome composition is limited (3). This study investigates the associations between gut microbiome composition and menopause symptoms.

Data was analysed from 70,399 peri- (N = 27,926) and post-menopausal women (N = 42,473) from the PREDICT 3 cohort (NCT04735835), examining the gut microbiome composition (using metagenomic sequencing) and diet quality using Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores derived from the PREDICT Food Frequency Questionnaire. Data was also collected on menopause symptoms, grouped into vasomotor, sexual, psychological and somatic domains. A Menopause Symptom Tracker Score (MSTS) (0-100) was used to capture symptom prevalence (out of 20 symptoms) and impact on quality of life (0-not at all, 1-a little, 3-quite a bit and 5-extremely), with higher score values reflecting greater symptom burden (4).

Using random forest machine learning (ML) models, we found that microbiome composition was predictive of the MSTS (AUCall = 0.70; AUCperi = 0.66; AUCpost = 0.65), as well as physical (e.g., fatigue, weight gain and slowed metabolism, thinning hair) and psychological (e.g., low mood or depression, anxiety and mood changes) domain scores (AUCall = 0.70; AUCperi = 0.66; AUCpost = 0.68 and AUCall = 0.70; AUCperi = 0.65; AUCpost = 0.66 respectively). Microbiome was also predictive of diet quality (HEI; AUCall = 0.77; AUCperi = 0.77; AUCpost = 0.75). Subsequently, we compared the top 50 species predictive for the HEI and MSTS respectively, and identified 32 common predictive species. Notably, the top predictive species for both HEI and MSTS was the not-yet-characterised Lachnospiraceae species-level genome bin SGB4964.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time associations between menopause symptoms and the gut microbiome have been identified. Further work is needed to unravel diet-microbiome-symptom interrelationships and investigate a potential causal role of microbiome in menopause symptom burden. This knowledge could ultimately lead to novel, microbiome-based strategies for improving the quality of life for women during and after the menopausal transition.

Information

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Bermingham, KM, Linenberg, I, Hall, WL et al. (2022) EBioMedicine 85, 104303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pounis, G, Birmingham, K, Capdevilla, J et al. 2024. Proc Nutr Soc OC112Google Scholar
Yang, M, Wen, S, Zhang, J et al. (2022) Dis Markers, 3767373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascinar, F, Berry, SE, Valdes, AM et al. (2021) Nat Med 27, 321332Google Scholar