Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-c8jtx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-23T09:30:23.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The anti-inflammatory effects of three different dietary supplement interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2025

Amrita Vijay
Affiliation:
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre and Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Science, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham
Liz Simpson
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham
Sarah Turley
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University College Dublin
Afroditi Kouraki
Affiliation:
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre and Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Science, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham
Ana M Valdes
Affiliation:
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre and Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Science, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bridging the gap between healthspan and lifespan requires targeted dietary strategies that modulate inflammation, a key driver of age-related decline(1). The gut microbiome plays a central role in this process, influencing immune function and metabolic health(2). We investigated the impact of a six-week dietary intervention with prebiotics, omega-3, and synbiotics (fermented kefir + prebiotic fibre mix) on systemic inflammation, aiming to uncover mechanisms that may support healthy ageing through diet-microbiome-immune interactions.

Proteomic profiling using the Olink 96 inflammation target panel was performed on fasting serum samples collected at baseline and follow-up of a 6-week intervention with a highly fermented kefir plus a prebiotic fibre mix (n=20) (170ml of kefir combined with 10g of prebiotic fibre mix), 500 mg of omega-3/day, 20g inulin/day or nothing. Changes from baseline and differences in change compared to the control group were analysed using standard parametric methods. Cohen’s delta was computed as a measure of effect size. An FDR p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

All three interventions resulted in significant drops in systemic inflammation markers compared to controls.TNF-α decreased by Δ -0.303 (SD 0.718); Cohen’s d -0.618 in the omega-3 arm and by Δ -0.402 [SD 0.449]; Cohen’s d -1.012 in the inulin arm, while IFN-γ Δ -0.597 [SD 0.428]; Cohen’s d=-0.940 and IL-6 Δ -0.479 [SD 0.338]; Cohen’s d=-0.882 decreased in the synbiotic arm. The strongest drops were observed in other markers, notably SIRT2 (Δ -0.636 [SD 0.482] d=-1.505 p<0.0001), 4EBP1 (Δ -0.875 [SD 0.634]; d=- 1.384 p=0.0004), CCL23 (Δ -0.812 [SD 0.919]; d=-1.356 p=0.0002) following synbiotic supplementation, along with changes in two mucosal cytokines (CCL25 Δ -0.566 [SD 0.659]; d=-1.137 p=0.001) and CCL28 (Δ -0.477 [SD 0.591]; d=-1.006 p=0.003). We also saw significant increases in short-chain fatty acids, specifically butyrate, which correlated with the decrease in levels of IL-6 following synbiotic supplementation.

Synbiotic supplementation led to the most significant changes across inflammatory markers, particularly those linked to metabolic and immune function. These findings highlight the potential of targeted dietary interventions to modulate host–microbiome interactions and inflammation, offering a promising strategy to support healthy ageing and extend healthspan.

Information

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Goldberg, EL, Dixit, VD (2015) Immunol Rev. 265(1):6374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiertsema, SP, van Bergenhenegouwen, J, Garssen, J et al. (2021) Nutrients 9;13 (3):886Google Scholar