No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 June 2025
This article considers the ways in which the material infrastructures of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) intersect with other infrastructural formations, and how the resulting overlaps can trigger processes of what I call ‘infrastructural splintering’. These processes cause infrastructure to be experienced in differentiating ways, creating divisive politics where once there might have been unity. Embracing these politics as an analytical starting point undermines the techno-material stability of the BRI and reveals its more-than-material affects. I illustrate these ideas by developing a case study of the impacts of the China-backed Colombo Port City project on Catholic fishing communities that are dependent upon the aquatic commons for survival. The construction of the Port City has brought about significant aquatic pollution and ecosystem destruction, and public erasure by Colombo’s political elites. Complicating matters is the dominance of the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka’s littoral spaces, which has become divided by a universalist politico-ecological consciousness imposed by the Vatican, a corruptible local hierarchy, and environmental activists who engage communities via the Church’s sacred infrastructures. By working through these processes of infrastructural splintering, I consider how the BRI has caused Sri Lanka’s littoral spaces to face increasingly fractious futures.
1 Lin, Shaun, Shimazu, Naoko and Sidaway, James D., ‘Theorising from the Belt and Road Initiative’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, vol. 62, no. 3, 2021, pp. CrossRefGoogle Scholar emphasis in original; see also Winter, Tim, ‘Geocultural power: China’s Belt and Road Initiative’, Geopolitics, vol. 26, no. 5, 2021, pp. 1376–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gao, Quan et al., ‘What and whose Confucianism: Sinophone communities and dialogical geopolitics’, Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, pp. 244–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woods, Orlando, ‘Between the commons and the cosmos: The sacred politics of the BRI in Southeast Asia and beyond’, Area Development and Policy, 2022, pp. 1–17Google Scholar.
2 Oakes, Tim, ‘The Belt and Road as method: Geopolitics, technopolitics and power through an infrastructure lens’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, vol. 62, no. 3, 2021, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Yuan Woon, Chih, ‘“Provincialising” the Belt and Road Initiative: Theorising with Chinese narratives of the “digital Silk Road”’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, vol. 62, no. 3, 2021, p. .Google Scholar
4 Oakes, ‘The Belt and Road as method’, p. 283; after Anand, Nikhil, Gupta, Akhil and Appel, Hannah (eds), The promise of infrastructure (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 After Graham, Steve and Marvin, Simon, Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition (London and New York: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
6 Larkin, Brian, ‘The politics and poetics of infrastructure’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 42, 2013, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Berlant, Lauren, ‘The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 34, no. 3, 2016, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Ibid.
9 After Ann Miller, Michelle, ‘B/ordering the environmental commons’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 44, no. 3, 2020, pp. 473–491.Google Scholar
10 Abeyasekera, Asha, Maqsood, Ammara, Perera, Iromi, Sajjad, Fizzah and Spencer, Jonathan, ‘Discipline in Sri Lanka, punish in Pakistan: Neoliberalism, governance, and housing compared’, Journal of the British Academy, vol. 7, no. 2, 2019, pp. 215–244.Google Scholar
11 Apostolopoulou, Elia, ‘Tracing the links between infrastructure-led development, urban transformation, and inequality in China’s Belt and Road Initiative’, Antipode, vol. 53, no. 3, 2021, pp. 831–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bunnell, Tim, ‘BRI and beyond: Comparative possibilities of extended Chinese urbanisation’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, vol. 62, no. 3, 2021, pp. 270–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Radicati, Alessandra, ‘Island journeys: Fisher itineraries and national imaginaries in Colombo’, Contemporary South Asia, vol. 27, no. 3, 2019, pp. 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Bunnell, ‘BRI and beyond’, p. 271; see also Ling, Ma et al., ‘Restoration of an ancestral temple in Guangzhou, China: Re-imagining history and traditions through devotion to art and creation’, Cultural Geographies, vol. 26, no. 1, 2019, pp. 141–149.Google Scholar
14 Gidwani, Vinay and Baviskar, Amita, ‘Urban commons’, Review of Urban Affairs, vol. 46, no. 50, 2010, p. .Google Scholar
15 Oakes, ‘The Belt and Road as method’, p. 281.
16 Lindberg, Jonas and Biddulph, Robin, ‘China’s Belt and Road Initiative: The need for livelihood-inclusive stories’, Geoforum, vol. 121, 2021, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Woon, ‘“Provincialising” the Belt and Road Initiative’, p. 286.
18 Ibid., p. 289.
19 Denzin Gergan, Mabel, ‘Animating the sacred, sentient and spiritual in post-humanist and material geographies’, Geography Compass, vol. 9, no. 5, 2015, p. .Google Scholar
20 Barua, Maan, ‘Infrastructure and non-human life: A wider ontology’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 45, no. 6, 2021, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Wilkins, Dominic, ‘Where is religion in political ecology?’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 45, no. 2, 2021, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Barua, ‘Infrastructure and non-human life’, p. 1467.
23 Barua, ‘Infrastructure and non-human life’; Orlando Woods and David A. Palmer, ‘The sacred dimensions of the BRI’s infrastructural commons’, in this special issue.
24 Ibid., p. 1468.
25 Abeyasekera et al., ‘Discipline in Sri Lanka, punish in Pakistan’.
26 Oakes, ‘The Belt and Road as method’, p. 281.
27 Apostolopoulou, ‘Tracing the links’, p. 832; emphasis in original.
28 Winter, ‘Geocultural power’, p. 1378.
29 Barua, ‘Infrastructure and non-human life’, p. 1467.
30 Gidwani and Baviskar, ‘Urban commons’, p. 42.
31 Ibid.
32 García-López, Gustavo A., Lang, Ursula and Singh, Neera, ‘Commons, commoning and co-becoming: Nurturing life-in-common and post-capitalist futures (An introduction to the theme issue)’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, vol. 4, no. 4, 2021, p. Google Scholar; see also Johnson, Melissa, ‘Creole becoming and the commons: Black freedom in Belize’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, vol. 4, no. 4, 2021, pp. 1217–1231Google Scholar; and Nelson, Sara H. and Bigger, Patrick, ‘Infrastructural nature’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 46, no. 1, 2022, pp. 86–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Blau, Jill P., ‘Interdependencies, caring, and coming: The case of herders in Ethiopia and Germany’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, vol. 4, no. 4, 2021, p. .Google Scholar
34 Wilkins, ‘Where is religion in political ecology?’, p. 287.
35 Berlant, ‘The commons’, p. 393.
36 Ibid., p. 394; emphasis added.
37 Apostolopoulou, ‘Tracing the links’, p. 833.
38 Ibid.
39 Ghertner, Asher, Rule by aesthetics: World-class city making in Delhi (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abeyasekera et al., ‘Discipline in Sri Lanka, punish in Pakistan’; Radicati, Alessandra, ‘The unstable coastline: Navigating dispossession and belonging in Colombo’, Antipode, vol. 52, no. 2, 2020, pp. 542–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Ruwanpura, Kanchana N., Rowe, Peter and Chan, Loritta, ‘Of bombs and belts: Exploring potential ruptures within China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Sri Lanka’, The Geographical Journal, vol. 186, 2020, pp. 339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Woods, Orlando, ‘A harbour in the country, a city in the sea: Infrastructural conduits, territorial inversions and the slippages of sovereignty in Sino-Sri Lankan development narratives’, Political Geography, vol. 92, 2022, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41 Radicati, ‘The unstable coastline’, p. 547.
42 Cited in Fuglerud, Øivind, ‘Manifesting Sri Lankan megalomania: The Rajapakses’ vision of empire and of a clean Colombo’, in Urban utopias: Excess and expulsion in neoliberal South Asia, (eds) Kuldova, Tereza and Varghese, Mathew A. (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2017), p. .Google Scholar
43 Radicati, ‘Island journeys’, p. 331.
44 Abeyasekera et al., ‘Discipline in Sri Lanka, punish in Pakistan’.
45 Radicati, ‘The unstable coastline’, p. 548.
46 Chan, Loritta, Ruwanpura, Kanchana N. and Brown, Benjamin D., ‘Environmental neglect: Other casualties of post-war infrastructure development’, Geoforum, vol. 105, 2019, pp. 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Radicati, ‘The unstable coastline’, p. 546.
48 Ruwanpura, Kanchana N., Rowe, Peter and Chan, Loritta, ‘(Dis)connecting Colombo: Situating the megapolis in postwar Sri Lanka’, The Professional Geographer, vol. 72, no. 1, 2020, pp. 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 Ruwanpura et al., ‘(Dis)connecting Colombo’, p. 172.
50 Ibid., p. 174.
51 After Stirrat, R. L., Power and religiosity in a post-colonial setting: Sinhala Catholics in contemporary Sri Lanka (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Johnson, Deborah, ‘Sri Lanka—a divided church in a divided polity: The brokerage of a struggling institution’, Contemporary South Asia, vol. 20, no. 1, 2012, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53 Ibid.; see also Woods, Orlando, ‘Neoliberal shifts and strategies of religious adaptation in post-war Sri Lanka’, Journal of Contemporary Religion, vol. 39, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 See, for example, Woods, Orlando, ‘Sri Lanka’s informal religious economy: Evangelical competitiveness and Buddhist hegemony in perspective’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol. 51, no. 2, 2012, pp. 203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woods, Orlando, ‘The spatial modalities of evangelical Christian growth in Sri Lanka: Evangelism, social ministry and the structural mosaic’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 38, no. 4, 2013, pp. 652–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woods, Orlando, ‘(Re)producing Buddhist hegemony in Sri Lanka: Advancing the discursive formations of self-Orientalism, religious (im)mobility and “unethical” conversion’, Religion, vol. 48, no. 2, 2018, pp. 215–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woods, Orlando, ‘Strategies of salvation: Evangelical Christian praxis and sites of degradation in Sri Lanka’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, vol. 59, no. 1, 2018, pp. 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 See Woods, Orlando, ‘Infrastructure’s (supra)sacralizing effects: Contesting littoral spaces of fishing, faith and futurity along Sri Lanka’s western coastline’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, vol. 112, no. 8, 2022, pp. 2344–2359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Alexander, Paul, ‘Sea tenure in southern Sri Lanka’, Ethnology, vol. 16, no. 3, 1977, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Bruland, Stine, ‘Transgressing religious boundaries: The power of aesthetics in Tamil Catholic and Hindu worship’, Material Religion, vol. 9, no. 4, 2013, pp. 418–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 Barua, ‘Infrastructure and non-human life’, p. 1469.
59 Ruwanpura et al., ‘Of bombs and belts’, p. 340.
60 Gergan, ‘Animating the sacred’, pp. 262–263.
61 Wilkins, ‘Where is religion in political ecology?’, p. 277.
62 After Alexander, ‘Sea tenure’; and Alexander, Paul, ‘Malu Mudalali: Monopsonies in southern Sri Lanka fish trading’, Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, no. 2, 1979, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
63 Radicati, ‘Island journeys’.
64 Wilkins, ‘Where is religion in political ecology?’, p. 279.
65 Johnson, ‘Creole becoming and the commons’, p. 1219.
66 Alexander, ‘Sea tenure’, p. 248.
67 Gidwani and Baviskar, ‘Urban commons’, p. 42; see also Ouma, Stefan, Johnson, Leigh and Bigger, Patrick, ‘Rethinking the financialization of “nature”’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 50, no. 3, 2018, pp. 500–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Nelson and Bigger, ‘Infrastructural nature’.
68 Berlant, ‘The commons’, p. 394.
69 Ibid.
70 Ibid., p. 397; see also Gidwani and Baviskar, ‘Urban commons’.
71 Johnson, Deborah and Korf, Benedikt, ‘The predicament of pastoral sovereignty’, Political Geography, vol. 87, 2021, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72 Johnson, Deborah, ‘Taking liberties and making liberty: Religious bounding and political violence in Sri Lanka’, Religion, vol. 46, no. 3, 2016, p. CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Johnson, ‘Sri Lanka’.
73 ‘Not a cardinal sin’, Colombo Telegraph, 2 July 2020.
74 Ibid.
75 Other sources put the cost at Rs 300 million; see ‘China harbour funds Rs. 300 m to renovate Basilica of Our Lady of Lanka, Tewatta’, Daily FT, 27 July 2015.
76 ‘Chinese funds for Tewatta Basilica: CSM responds to cardinal’, Daily Mirror, 20 August 2015.
77 ‘Basilica renovation runs into stormy seas’, The Sunday Times, 9 August 2015.
78 Ibid.
79 ‘Colombo archbishop slams Sri Lankan government over China-funded Port City project’, South Asia Monitor, 4 June 2021.
80 ‘Duel between the Sri Lankan cardinal and the Chinese ogre’, UCA News, 9 July 2021.
81 Johnson, ‘Creole becoming and the commons’, p. 1220; after Singh, Neera M., ‘Introduction: Affective ecologies and conservation’, Conservation and Society, vol. 16, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82 Radicati, ‘The unstable coastline’, p. 544.
83 Abeyasekera et al., ‘Discipline in Sri Lanka, punish in Pakistan’, p. 218.
84 González-Hidalgo, Marien, ‘The ambivalent political work of emotions in the defence of territory, life and the commons’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, vol. 4, no. 4, 2021, p. .Google Scholar
85 Ibid., p. 1295; after Singh, ‘Introduction’.
86 Barua, ‘Infrastructure and non-human life’, p. 1469.
87 Stirrat, R. L., ‘The Palk Bay fishing dispute revisited’, India Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 1, 2018, p. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88 Bunnell, ‘BRI and beyond’, p. 272.
89 Oakes, ‘The Belt and Road as method’, p. 284.