We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Billig, Michael (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society10(4):.10.1177/0957926599010004005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, Lewis (1975). Two methods in search of a substance. American Sociological Review40(6):691–700.10.2307/2094174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard (2012). Membership categorization analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the joy of Sacks?Discourse Studies14(3):.10.1177/1461445612440776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Matthew, & Turowetz, Jason (2023). Morality in the making of sense and self: Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments and the new science of morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190096045.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language50(4):696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics39(3):.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar