To determine base rates of invalid performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) undertaking rehabilitation who were referred for clinical assessment, and the factors contributing to TOMM failure.

Retrospective file review of consecutive TBI referrals for neuropsychological assessment over seven years. TOMM failure was conventionally defined as performance <45/50 on Trial 2 or Retention Trial. Demographic, injury, financial compensation, occupational, and medical variables were collected.

Four hundred and ninety one TBI cases (Median age = 40 years [IQR = 26–52], 79% male, 82% severe TBI) were identified. Overall, 48 cases (9.78%) failed the TOMM. Logistic regression analyses revealed that use of an interpreter during the assessment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 8.25, 95%CI = 3.96–17.18), outpatient setting (aOR = 4.80, 95%CI = 1.87–12.31) and post-injury psychological distress (aOR = 2.77, 95%CI = 1.35–5.70) were significant multivariate predictors of TOMM failure. The TOMM failure rate for interpreter cases was 49% (21/43) in the outpatient setting vs. 7% (2/30) in the inpatient setting. By comparison, 9% (21/230) of non-interpreter outpatient cases failed the TOMM vs. 2% (4/188) of inpatient cases.

TOMM failure very rarely occurs in clinical assessment of TBI patients in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. It is more common in the outpatient setting, particularly in non-English-speaking people requiring an interpreter. The findings reinforce the importance of routinely administering stand-alone performance validity tests in assessments of clinical TBI populations, particularly in outpatient settings, to ensure that neuropsychological test results can be interpreted with a high degree of confidence.

To determine associations of alcohol use with cognitive aging among middle-aged men.

1,608 male twins (mean 57 years at baseline) participated in up to three visits over 12 years, from 2003–2007 to 2016–2019. Participants were classified into six groups based on current and past self-reported alcohol use: lifetime abstainers, former drinkers, very light (1–4 drinks in past 14 days), light (5–14 drinks), moderate (15–28 drinks), and at-risk drinkers (>28 drinks in past 14 days). Linear mixed-effects regressions modeled cognitive trajectories by alcohol group, with time-based models evaluating rate of decline as a function of baseline alcohol use, and age-based models evaluating age-related differences in performance by current alcohol use. Analyses used standardized cognitive domain factor scores and adjusted for sociodemographic and health-related factors.

Performance decreased over time in all domains. Relative to very light drinkers, former drinkers showed worse verbal fluency performance, by –0.21 SD (95% CI –0.35, –0.07), and at-risk drinkers showed faster working memory decline, by 0.14 SD (95% CI 0.02, –0.20) per decade. There was no evidence of protective associations of light/moderate drinking on rate of decline. In age-based models, light drinkers displayed better memory performance at advanced ages than very light drinkers (+0.14 SD; 95% CI 0.02, 0.20 per 10-years older age); likely attributable to residual confounding or reverse association.

Alcohol consumption showed minimal associations with cognitive aging among middle-aged men. Stronger associations of alcohol with cognitive aging may become apparent at older ages, when cognitive abilities decline more rapidly.

Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a plasma-based biomarker for neurodegeneration, is a promising marker for early Alzheimer disease (AD) detection in individuals at increased risk. We previously reported that Presenilin1 (PSEN1) E280A carriers have increased levels of plasma NfL relative to non-carrier family members twenty years before the onset of clinical symptoms. Abstract reasoning is one of the first cognitive abilities to deteriorate in AD. Here, we examined whether levels of plasma NfL were associated with non-verbal abstract reasoning performance in non-demented PSEN1-E280A carriers and non-carriers.

A total of 798 members of the Colombian kindred with the PSEN1 E280A mutation (462 cognitively-unimpaired and 336 non-carriers; mean age= 34.02 (10.53), mean education= 8.23(4.60), 57% females and 43% males) were included in the study. Participants completed the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and underwent blood sampling. Plasma NfL concentrations were measured with a single molecule array (Simoa) method. Mann-Whitney U test and education-adjusted Spearman partial correlation were used to examine group differences and associations between abstract reasoning performance and NfL levels.

Non-carriers were older (p<.001) and had higher levels of education than carriers (p=.025). Compared to non-carriers, carriers had higher levels of NfL (p=.014), lower performance on the MMSE (p<.001) and on the RPM (p=.001). In the whole sample, performance on the RPM was significantly associated with age (r= -.144, p<.001), and MMSE score (r=.198, p<.001). In carriers only, performance on the RPM was negatively associated with NfL levels (r=-.121, p=.009). This association was not significant in non-carriers.

Our findings support the hypothesis that plasma NfL levels may be indicators of disease progression and early cognitive dysfunction in autosomal dominant AD. Future work with NfL, abstract reasoning and memory with larger samples across the preclinical/prodromal spectrum will allow a more comprehensive examination of these associations.

To examine neuropsychological functioning as a predictor of psychosocial adjustment difficulties at discharge from a postacute residential rehabilitation facility for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and depression as a potential mediator.

A retrospective record review was conducted of 172 adults who received rehabilitation services for TBI. Individuals completed a full battery of neuropsychological tests, depression assessment, and functional assessments at admission. Functional assessments were also obtained at discharge.

A two-phase structural equation model analysis was performed. The first phase specified a good fitting model of a cognitive functioning (CF) latent construct with four indicators of cognitive domains measuring verbal fluency, cognitive flexibility, verbal learning, and working memory. Worse CF was associated with greater psychosocial adjustment impairment at discharge, but not related to depression. Psychosocial adjustment impairment at admission was positively associated with depression when controlling for CF, however depression did not predict psychosocial adjustment at discharge. Thus, depression was not found to be a significant mediator of psychosocial adjustment impairment at discharge.

Results provide support for neuropsychological functioning at the start of postacute rehabilitation for TBI as an important predictor of psychosocial functioning difficulties that remain upon discharge and highlights the need to examine mechanisms beyond depression.

This study is based on long-term follow-up of participants in a randomized double-blind sham surgery-controlled trial (1995–1999) designed to determine the effectiveness of implantation of human embryonic mesencephalic tissue containing dopamine neuron precursors into the brains of patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). We investigated differences between long-term survivors and nonsurvivors at baseline in order to contribute to information regarding optimal patient selection for upcoming stem cell trials.

Forty participants were randomly assigned to receive either neural implantation or sham surgery. Thirty-four patients who ultimately received the implant were followed periodically with the most recent assessment occurring in 2015–2016. Demographic information, neurological measures, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, neuropsychological assessments, and a personality assessment were included in the current analyses. T-tests were used to compare survivors and nonsurvivors. Logistic regression analyses examined predictors of survivorship.

Five of six survivors were female. They were younger than nonsurvivors (p = .03) and more neuropsychologically “intact” across a broad range of cognitive areas (significance levels ranged from <.001 to .045). There were no differences between survivors and nonsurvivors off medications at baseline on neurological or PET assessments. Survivors reported more “Openness to Experience” (p = .004) than nonsurvivors. Using empirically derived predictor variables, results of logistic regression analyses indicated that Animal Naming (cognitive task) and Openness to Experience (personality variable) were the strongest predictors of survivorship.

Variables to consider when selecting participants for future cell-based therapies include being “intact” neuropsychologically, level of Openness to Experience, younger age, and inclusion of women.

The current study had two primary objectives: 1) To assess the dose-response relationship between acute bouts of aerobic exercise intensity and performance in multiple cognitive domains (episodic memory, attention, and executive function) and 2) To replicate and extend the literature by examining the dose-response relationship between aerobic exercise intensity and pattern separation.

18 young adults (mean age = 21.6, sd = 2.6; mean education = 13.9, sd = 3.4; 50% female) were recruited from The Ohio State University and surrounding area (Columbus, OH). Participants completed control (no exercise), light intensity, and vigorous intensity exercise conditions across three counterbalanced appointments. For each participant, all three appointments occurred at approximately the same time of day with at least 2 days between appointments. Following the rest or exercise conditions and after an approximately 7 minute delay, participants completed a Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST; Stark et al., 2019) to assess pattern separation. This task was always administered first as we attempted to replicate previous studies and further clarify the relationship between acute bouts of aerobic exercise and pattern separation by implementing an exercise stimulus that varied in intensity. After the MST, three brief cognitive tasks (roughly 5 min each) were administered in a counterbalanced order: a gradual-onset continuous performance task (gradCPT; Esterman et al., 2013), the flanker task from the NIH toolbox, and a face-name episodic memory task. Here we report results from the gradCPT, which assesses sustained attention and inhibitory control. Heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion were collected to validate the rest and exercise conditions. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to assess the relationship between exercise condition and dependent measures of sustained attention and inhibitory control and pattern separation.

One-way repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed a main effect of exercise condition on gradCPT task performance for task discrimination ability (d') and commission error rate (p’s < .05). Pairwise comparisons revealed task discrimination ability was significantly higher following the light intensity exercise condition versus the control condition. Commission error rate was significantly lower for both the light and vigorous exercise conditions compared to the control condition. For the MST, two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed an expected significant main effect of lure similarity on task performance; however, there was not a significant main effect of exercise intensity on task performance (or a significant interaction).

The current study indicated that acute bouts of exercise improve both sustained attention and inhibitory control as measured with the gradCPT. We did not replicate previous work reporting that acute bouts of exercise improve pattern separation in young adults. Our results further indicate that vigorous exercise did not detrimentally impact or improve pattern separation performance. Our results indicate that light intensity exercise is sufficient to enhance sustained attention and inhibitory control, as there were no significant differences in performance following light versus vigorous exercise.

To explore the relationship between age, education, sex, and ApoE4 (+) status to brain volume among a cohort with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI).

One hundred and twenty-three participants were stratified into Hispanic (n = 75) and White non-Hispanic (WNH, N = 48). Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted with age, education, sex, and ApoE4 status as predictor variables and left and right combined MRI volumes of the hippocampus, parahippocampus, and entorhinal cortex as dependent variables. Variations in head sizes were corrected by normalization with a total intracranial volume measurement.

Bonferroni-corrected results indicated that when controlling for ApoE4 status, education, and age, sex was a significant predictor of hippocampal volume among the Hispanic group (β = .000464, R2 = .196, p < .01) and the WNH group (β = .000455, R2 = .195, p < .05). Education (β = .000028, R2 = .168, p < .01) and sex (β = .000261, R2 = .168, p < .01) were significant predictors of parahippocampal volume among the Hispanic MCI group when controlling for the effects of ApoE4 status and age. One-way ANCOVAs comparing hippocampal and parahippocampal volume between males and females within groups revealed that females had significantly larger hippocampal volumes (p < .05). Hispanic females had significantly larger hippocampal (p < .001) and parahippocampal (p < .05) volume compared to males. No sex differences in parahippocampal volume were noted among WNHs.

Biological sex, rather than ApoE4 status, was a greater predictor of hippocampal volume among Hispanic and WNH females. These findings add to the mixed literature on sex differences in dementia research and highlight continued emphasis on ethnic populations to elucidate on neurodegenerative disparities.

Resiliency has been shown to attenuate and even protect against cognitive impairment from mental and physical stressors. Recently, it has been demonstrated that individuals who score high in psychological resilience tend to have less impairment following a mTBI.The COVID-19 pandemic proved to be an uncertain time for many. Periods of isolation, unemployment, and of course, sickness, meant more time at home. The partial or complete breakdown of an individual’s day-to-day routine paired with the stress of the pandemic has reinforced the need for psychological resilience. This analysis investigates the relationship between self-reported routine adherence and an individual’s corresponding psychological resilience. We hypothesize that individuals who maintained a structured daily routine during the pandemic will have higher levels of psychological resilience, enabling them to better handle periods of extreme stress.

8963 English-speaking adults (18-92 years old; 59.5% female) from across the U.S. completed an online, monthly cross-sectional (∼1000 participants per month), battery of questions that included the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and a self-reported sleep and routine rating(s) between June 2020 and April 2021. We measured the level of an individual’s routine by adding the self-reported survey scores of waking at the same time and maintaining a routine throughout the day. Both questions were scored 0-4 (Likert-style) for a score range of 0 to 8; higher scores indicated a higher adherence to a daily structure. Weeknight sleep (Sun-Thurs) was a self-reported average of the hours of sleep obtained over the past 4 weeks. A two-way ANCOVA was used to analyze the effects that routine had on subsequent psychological resilience scores while controlling for average sleep duration.

A significant main effect routine on psychological resilience was found F(8,8953) =227, p=<.00001 after controlling for average reported weeknight sleep. An independent t-test was performed to determine the differences between those who fall above and below the average score (M= 5.1) for routine adherence. Individuals who were above average in adherence (M=71.1, SD=15.5) had significantly higher CD-RISC scores than individuals who did not (M=59.2, SD=16.7); t(9166)=35.1, p <0.001.

Individuals who maintained a more structured day throughout the pandemic were more likely to score higher on psychological resilience assessments than those who did not. Chronic stress is known to contribute to the development and exacerbation of many common psychiatric conditions like anxiety and depression. These results suggest that having a regular routine may have positive effects on an individual’s ability to bounce back from stressful cognitive and psychological events. This relationship should be further investigated in clinical populations as a potential intervention or adjunctive treatment for common neuropsychiatric conditions.