Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T02:38:20.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drop impact on small surfaces: thickness and velocity profiles of the expanding sheet in the air

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

Y. Wang  and
L. Bourouiba
Y. Wang
Affiliation:
The Fluid Dynamics of Disease Transmission Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
L. Bourouiba*
Affiliation:
The Fluid Dynamics of Disease Transmission Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: lbouro@mit.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the radially expanding sheet formed upon impact of a drop on a surface of comparable size to that of the drop. A unified self-similar solution for the unsteady radial thickness profile of the expanding sheet is derived from first principles in the inviscid limit. This unified functional form reconciles two conflicting theoretical profiles of sheet thickness proposed in the literature and allows for the collapse on a single curve direct measurements of sheet thickness profiles reported in the literature and the detailed measurements conducted herein. We show good agreement between our proposed unified thickness profile and data from our experiments for a range of surface-to-drop size ratios. We show that there is an optimal range of surface-to-drop size ratio for which the hypothesis of inviscid thin sheet expansion in the air holds. Outside of this optimal range, either insufficient vertical momentum is transferred to horizontal momentum to form an expanding sheet or viscous effects become too important to neglect. In this latter regime, the dominant effect of surface friction is to modify the velocity profile. We elucidate this effect using a Blasius-type boundary layer model. Finally, we relate the geometry of the drop in its early phase of impact to the sheet thickness profile in the air. We show that the coefficients of the proposed unified similarity thickness profile can directly be linked to volume flux conservation at early times, and to the maximum sheet thickness at the edge of the surface. Our results thus quantitatively link the fluid history on the surface to the thickness and velocity profiles of the freely expanding sheet in the air.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Aerosols/atomization Drops and Bubbles: Drops and Bubbles Interfacial Flows (free surface): Interfacial Flows (free surface)

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 814 , 10 March 2017 , pp. 510 - 534
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Banine, V. Y., Koshelev, K. N. & Swinkels, G. H. P. M. 2011 Physical processes in EUV sources for microlithography. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44, 253001.Google Scholar
Bergeron, V., Bonn, D., Martin, J. & Vovelle, L. 2000 Controlling droplet deposition with polymer additives. Nature 405, 772–775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourouiba, L. 2016 A sneeze. New Engl. J. Med. 375 (8), e15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourouiba, L. & Bush, J. W. M. 2013 Drops and bubbles in the environment. In Handbook of Environmental Fluid Dynamics (ed. Fernando, H. J. S.), chap. 32, pp. 427–439. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bourouiba, L., Dehandschoewercker, E. & Bush, J. W. M. 2014 Violent expiratory events: on coughing and sneezing. J. Fluid Mech. 745, 537–563.Google Scholar
Clanet, C. & Villermaux, E. 2002 Life of a smooth liquid sheet. J. Fluid Mech. 462, 307–340.Google Scholar
Eggers, J., Fontelos, M. A., Josserand, C. & Zaleski, S. 2010 Drop dynamics after impact on a solid wall: theory and simulations. Phys. Fluids 22, 1–13.Google Scholar
Eggers, J. & Villermaux, E. 2008 Physics of liquid jets. Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 036601.Google Scholar
Gilet, T. & Bourouiba, L. 2014 Rain-induced ejection of pathogens from leaves: revisiting the hypothesis of splash-on-film using high-speed visualization. Integr. Compar. Biol. 54, 974–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilet, T. & Bourouiba, L. 2015 Fluid fragmentation shapes rain-induced foliar disease transmission. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141092.Google Scholar
Josserand, C. & Thoroddsen, S. T. 2016 Drop impact on a solid surface. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 365–391.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Kim, M. H. 2005 A photochromic dye activation method for measuring the thickness of liquid films. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 26 (6), 966–970.Google Scholar
Lastakowski, H., Boyer, F., Biance, A. L., Pirat, C. & Ybert, C. 2014 Bridging local to global dynamics of drop impact onto solid substrates. J. Fluid Mech. 747, 103–118.Google Scholar
Rein, M. 1993 Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces. Fluid Dyn. Res. 12, 61–93.Google Scholar
Riboux, G. & Gordillo, J. M. 2014 Experiments of drops impacting a smooth solid surface: a model of the critical impact speed for drop splashing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 024507.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V., Berberovi, E. & Tropea, C. 2009 Inertia dominated drop collisions. I. On the universal flow in the lamella. Phys. Fluids 21, 052103.Google Scholar
Rozhkov, A., Prunet-Foch, B. & Vignes-Adler, M. 2002 Impact of water drops on small targets. Phys. Fluids 14, 3485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozhkov, A., Prunet-Foch, B. & Vignes-Adler, M. 2004 Dynamics of a liquid lamella resulting from the impact of a water drop on a small target. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 460, 2681–2704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savart, F. 1833 Mémoire sur le choc de deux veines liquides animées de mouvements directement opposés. Ann. Chim. 55, 257–310.Google Scholar
Scharfman, B. E., Techet, A. H., Bush, J. W. M. & Bourouiba, L. 2016 Visualization of sneeze ejecta: steps of fluid fragmentation leading to respiratory droplets. Exp. Fluids 57, 24.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1959 The dynamics of thin sheets of fluid III. Disintegration of fluid sheets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 253, 313–321.Google Scholar
Thoroddsen, S. T., Takehara, K. & Etoh, T. G. 2012 Micro-splashing by drop impacts. J. Fluid Mech. 706, 560–570.Google Scholar
Vernay, C., Ramos, L. & Ligoure, C. 2015 Free radially expanding liquid sheet in air: time- and space-resolved measurement of the thickness field. J. Fluid Mech. 764, 428–444.Google Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Bossa, B. 2011 Drop fragmentation on impact. J. Fluid Mech. 668, 412–435.Google Scholar
Watson, E. J. 1964 The radial spread of a liquid jet over a horizontal plane. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 481–499.Google Scholar
Worthington, A. M. 1876 On the forms assumed by drops of liquids falling vertically on a horizontal plate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 25, 498–503.Google Scholar
Yarin, A. L. 2006 Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing…. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 159–192.Google Scholar
Yarin, A. L. & Weiss, D. A. 1995 Impact of drops on solid surfaces: self-similar capillary waves, and splashing as a new type of kinematic discontinuity. J. Fluid Mech. 283, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zable, J. L. 1977 Splatter during ink jet printing. IBM J. Res. Dev. 21, 315–320.Google Scholar