OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Translational research involves researchers’ teams working together to address health issues. However, successful translational researchers in health disparities require a set of competencies and skills. In order to increase the number of new minority investigators in translational research focused on health disparities, the Hispanics-in-Research Capability: SoHP & SoM Partnership and the Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium designed and implemented a webinar series “Fostering the Next Generation of Researchers in Health Disparities.” METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From March 31 to July 14, 2017, this webinar series offered the theoretical perspectives of health disparities, research methodology specific to its study, and intervention strategies to address health disparities in communities through minority investigators. National and local interdisciplinary experts were the presenters. Participants’ experience and impact were assessed through a self-administrated questionnaire. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 78 minority investigators participated in this webinar. Overall, participants indicated that the webinar improved their knowledge and skills about health disparities research. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Results guide the programs actions plans to enhance and support the translational researchers’ capacity. Diverse capacity building initiatives including peer-to-peer education, online course, tailored coaching, and other interventions have been designed to address researchers’ needs. This webinar was a pathway to build the next generation of translational researchers in health disparities.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Community Engagement Forum (CEF), a quarterly series hosted by the Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CCTSI) and the ACCORDS Education program, provides seminars from leading academic and community research partners. Our goal is to share the process and outcomes so others may implement a similar forum in their institution. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In 2019, CCTSI and the ACCORDS Education Program partnered to offer a forum to exchange best practices for investigators and study teams conducting community-engaged research. Each forum features presenters from community and academic partnerships. Initially this series was offered in-person; during the COVID-19 Pandemic the Forum moved online. At registration we collect data on current position, school/department or organization, and how they heard about the forum. Post session evaluations are also collected. Various topics have been covered including: community engagement foundations, creating advisory boards, responding appropriately to community needs in a pandemic, data equity, and community dissemination. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Between October 2019 and October 2022, we hosted twelve Community Engagement Forums. A total of 442 people have attended the forums, with the School of Medicine having the highest representation. Among attendees, university research staff are the highest represented position in attendance, with 115 attendees over the 12 forums. 133 people have completed evaluation questions since the start of the forum series. High percentages of agreement were seen from the question, will you use this information to make adjustments/improvements or continue the conversation . Additionally, most respondents agreed that the presentations were useful to their current or future work. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The CEF series has filled a gap for desired resources related to best practices for community-engaged research. CCTSI CE&HC and ACCORDS Education have created a learning community for investigators and study teams to share lessons learned and provide opportunities for trouble-shooting research ideas as they arise.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Multivariate regression is used for surgical outcomes analyses; but does not allow for evaluation of all variables. Machine learning could be the perfect alternative to address this issue. Our aim was to evaluate whether machine learning is a feasible alternative to evaluate surgical outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: H-CUP National Inpatient Sample database was queried for adult patients with colorectal cancer who underwent colorectal resection, while the NSQIP database was queried for adult patients with rectal cancer who underwent proctectomy. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with 30-day complications following those procedures. Subsequently, machine learning techniques of under-sampling and oversampling were applied to the same datasets for the evaluation of risk factors for the same outcome. These techniques were used to achieve a larger population sample size and to detect statistical significance. Results between the two methodologies were compared. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Multivariate regression revealed that open approach, gender, race, geographic location, number of comorbidities, and type of insurance was associated with increased 30-day mortality in colorectal resection patients. Conversely, the use of machine learning revealed that preoperative weight loss, preexistent chest heart failure, renal failure or perivascular disease were strongly associated with 30-day mortality. For proctectomy patients, multivariate regression found no association between surgical approach and 30-day mortality. However, machine learning revealed gender, hypertension, and reoperation to be strongly associated with 30-day mortality. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Machine learning enabled multiple combinations that were not possible to examine in a conventional multivariate regression analysis. Machine learning compared to traditional multivariate regression produced significantly different outcomes, highlighting the need for in depth of these methodologies.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The NIH states, “The training of the biomedical workforce has always been an integral part of the NIH mission… It takes just one good mentor to influence the career of a new investigator; it takes a robust culture of mentorship across the research community to strengthen, sustain and diversify the entire biomedical research enterprise.” The University of Minnesota’s CTSI-Education core strives to build and maintain a strong culture of mentoring by providing CTSI KL2 scholars an opportunity to mentor an undergraduate student participating in the Pathways to Research Program (PReP). Using this mentoring model, participants gain valuable benefits and CTSI’s culture of mentoring is strengthened. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Participating KL2 scholars are matched with a promising PReP scholar for a 12-week mentored research project. The PReP program selects top candidates through a highly competitive application process. Students work in their mentor’s lab full-time, funded by CTSI-Ed. They engage in additional activities together including a mentor/mentee, an interview activity and 2 social events. Junior faculty scholars are asked to participate as judges at CTSI’s Poster Session and are invited to present at PReP seminars. The program culminates with the announcement of the Junior Mentor of the Year, in which scholars nominate their mentors for the award. Junior faculty mentors receive support through a training course, Optimizing the Practice of Mentoring, mentor orientation and a roundtable discussion with the program director and other mentors. The program’s infrastructure is designed to foster mentee/mentor relationships through faculty and staff support. Junior faculty receive one-on-one coaching when faced with difficult mentoring situations and are recognized for their mentoring successes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Junior faculty mentors highly rate the program on the following points; the experience was a good use of time, I am satisfied with my experience, I would recommend this program to faculty colleagues and students. Undergraduates and Professional students rated their mentoring relationship as 1 of 3 best outcomes of the program. In exit surveys, their highly rated program successes include having a network that helps move their career forward, and confidence to persist through training to become a successful researcher. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Creating a culture of mentoring is important to the strengthen, sustain and diversify the biomedical research workforce. This mentoring model contributes to the mission while vertically integrating CTSI-Ed’s KL2 and PReP programs. On an individual level, junior faculty improve communication and management skills, develop leadership qualities, increase their network, provide a sense of fulfilment and personal growth, and reinforce their own skills and knowledge of subject. They are also provided a top undergraduate student worker fully funded by the program.

ABSTRACT IMPACT: Optimizing the use of endotracheal aspirate cultures (EACs) has the potential to improve the care of complex mechanically ventilated children by improving testing practices and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic treatment for false-positive results. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: An electronic survey has previously been employed to characterize the practices and attitudes around blood cultures among critically ill children. The objective of this work was to develop and pilot a new survey as a tool to understand practices and attitudes that could inform quality improvement initiatives to optimize EAC practices. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Informed by prior experience of diagnostic stewardship of EAC in other settings and using a similar structure to the blood culture practice survey, we developed an electronic self-administered survey sent to respiratory therapists, advanced practice providers, and physicians at the Johns Hopkins All Children’s pediatric intensive care unit. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 27 of 87 clinicians (37%) responded to the survey (22 respiratory therapists, 9 attending physicians and 1 advanced practice provider). Responses indicated samples are typically collected by respiratory therapists via in-line (endotracheal) or open suctioning (tracheostomy). Most respondents did not feel EACs could lead to unintended negative consequences (71%), agreed practices vary between people (89%), and felt an algorithm would help align the clinical team (79%). Most respondents agreed some clinicians may be reluctant to change practice (82%) and may not change practice due to concern for missing diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia or tracheitis (78%). Surveillance cultures were not used in this unit and there were no prior EAC diagnostic stewardship efforts. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: This survey captured practices, perceptions and barriers to changes that will inform the implementation of quality improvement initiatives to optimize EAC use in this unit. Future studies can consider utilizing an electronic survey to describe practice variation, clinician believes and attitudes about EAC testing in ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Innovation in healthcare is increasingly dependent on technology and teamwork, requiring effective collaboration among diverse disciplines. However, large knowledge barriers exist between these diverse disciplines which hinders effective communication and the innovation processes. We organized an intensive team-based competition event, Sinai MedMaker Challenge, that engaged individuals with a wide range of backgrounds in medicine, biomedical research, computers science, and engineering to collaborate in solving medical problems with technology-based solutions. The learning objectives were to: enable participants to identify healthcare problems which lend themselves to technology-based solutions; delineate key behaviors critical to multidisciplinary team success; identify optimal strategies for communicating in teams; engage and inspire participants to apply knowledge of technology to meaningfully impact clinical care and well-being. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Sinai MedMaker Challenge was a 48-hour team-based competition, modeled after previously held health “hackathons.” Adapting from guidelines provided by MIT Hacking Medicine, the event gathered participants from diverse backgrounds (clinicians, medical students, graduate students in biomedical science and humanities, software developers, engineers, and others), for the purpose of utilizing technology to address pressing problems in the diagnosis, management and/or treatment of pain and/or fatigue. The event flow can be outlined as follows: Phase 1—pre-event brainstorming via Slack and Sparkboard online platforms; Phase 2—problem review with clinical experts; Phase 3—solution pitches, formation of teams, development of prototype solutions; Phase 4—presentations and prizes awarded. The event was sponsored by ISMMS Institutes and Technology Companies. Mentors roamed throughout the event to support the teams in the technical, clinical, and business development aspects of their solutions. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In total, 78 participants forming 14 teams, worked on the development of software and hardware prototypes (apps/websites, devices, wearables) to address a variety of pain and fatigue problems, culminating in final pitch presentations to a panel of judges comprised of academic experts; innovators and entrepreneurs in the technology start up space. Award recipients were: (1) PT partners, a wearable device for monitoring physical therapy post knee replacement; (2) SickleMeNot, an interactive, multimodal website/app for children designed to assess, monitor and manage pain; and (3) Biolumen, a functional biofeedback system, to treat chronic back pain. Evaluations revealed a high-degree of satisfaction with the event. Several teams continue to develop their prototypes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The Sinai MedMaker Challenge (1) was a compelling and productive forum to bring together students, trainees, faculty and other stakeholders to explore tech-based solutions for management, monitoring, and treatment of pain and fatigue; and (2) can be repeated annually, fostering a “Community of Practice,” and expanded to offer pre and post event opportunities to encourage iterative learning and ongoing creative output.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In a previous genome-wide association study of European Americans, rs12772424, a variant in the gene encoding transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2), was shown to have a SNP-BMI interaction association with bipolar disorder (BD). The objective of this study was to replicate this finding in an African American (AA) sample. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using a sample of 659 controls and 323 BD cases from the Genetic Association Information (GAIN) Study of BD, we conducted analyses to assess association between BD and the interaction of BMI with genetic variation in TCF7L2. For this study we identified 4572 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a 1Mb region around the candidate SNP rs1272424. Based on variants identified in the prior analysis of the larger European American dataset we selected SNPs for analysis in the AA data. This allowed for a smaller AA sample, and still maintained adequate power for statistical significance. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate observing an effect of TCF7L2 variation on the relationship between BD and BMI in the AA data. We also anticipate that combining results from the European and African American patients may help narrow down potentially functional variants in TCF7L2 that influence the association between BD and BMI. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Psychiatric genetics studies lack ancestral diversity among participants, decreasing their generalizability, and possibly increasing health disparities, especially for diseases like BD, which is often misdiagnosed and untreated in AAs. This work propels us towards understanding the genetics of BD and obesity in this underrepresented population.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: (1) To discuss key differences of behavioral clinical trials from trials involving drugs, devices, and biologics and (2) to discuss NIH efforts to provide a study protocol template for use by investigators conducting behavioral clinical trials. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A working group was convened by NIH to refine the commonly used protocol template required for investigators conducting Phase 2 or 3 NIH-funded clinical trials. The committee met by phone regularly for 4 months to review, discuss, and refine each section of the template as needed to include aspects relevant to behavioral trials. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The behavioral trial protocol template draft has been created and is being further modified by feedback from the research community. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Use of the NIH behavioral trial protocol template is expected to enhance the quality of any behavioral study, because the template and supporting materials were developed with the unique aspects of behavioral research in mind.

ABSTRACT IMPACT: We review our strategy to use live community events on Facebook to share health and clinical research information and share further steps to increase engagement. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To describe the use of live community events to enhance communication about clinical and health research through a Facebook platform (MN Research Link) with diverse social media users. The project identified variables associated with video engagement and strategic implications. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From June 2019 to November 2020 we streamed 31 events on the MN Research Link Facebook public page. Events highlighted different investigators’ clinical and health research in the areas of mental health, health and wellness, chronic diseases and immunology/infectious diseases. Facebook analytics were used to determine the number of views, total minutes viewed, average video watch time, and audience retention. Engagement score was calculated as the total number of interactions (likes, shares, and comments) divided by total number of followers (N=1437), expressed as a percentage RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Events averaged 24secs/16 min (SD=0.4). A mean of 1.61 (SD=1.28) followers viewed the events live but an average of 417.52 (SD=793.50) followers viewed after the event posted. The average engagement score was 1.1%. Mean total minutes viewed for all 31 videos was 253.5 (SD= 437.6). Viewers spent an average of 17 seconds (SD=0.01) watching each piece of video content. On average 28 followers viewed the events for at least 1-minute event (SD= 48.7). Audience retention at the halfway point for each video was 15.74% (SD=0.19). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Results suggest that novel approaches are necessary for active engagement. Promotion of live events is recommended to increase participation and length of engagement. Prior length of engagement (average 17 seconds), suggests refining video introduction will increase engagement.

Objectives/Goals: Collaborations between translational science programs and academic health sciences libraries can enhance research impact by improving efficiency, leveraging diverse professional expertise, and expanding opportunities for collaboration between librarians and translational science programs. Methods/Study Population: A team science approach was utilized, integrating findings from a literature review, practical experiences of health sciences librarians, and collaborative writing. An analysis of case studies from institutions with successful partnerships explored the roles of libraries in partnering with translational science programs. The data collected were mapped to the Clinical and Translational Science Award Program’s five functional areas outlined in the Notice of Funding Opportunity PAR-24–272. Librarians from 21 institutions engaged in discussions and collaborative writing to share insights and identify key factors driving successful partnerships. Results/Anticipated Results: Academic health sciences libraries play a crucial role in enhancing translational science programs through expert knowledge management, facilitation of research dissemination, and support for interdisciplinary collaboration. Results from this project include a table outlining 16 specific opportunities mapped across five functional areas and six topical categories for translational science programs and libraries to collaborate effectively.Successful partnerships demonstrate improved research workflows, increased interactions between researchers and libraries, and accelerated translation of discoveries into clinical settings. These collaborations illustrate opportunities for other institutions to adopt as they consider best practices in supporting translational science. Discussion/Significance of Impact: By combining resources and expertise between libraries and translational science programs, these partnerships enhance the ability to transform scientific discoveries into real-world clinical applications, drive innovation, and amplify the contributions of both libraries and translational science programs.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Dietary approach to stop hypertension (DASH) is a proven intervention to treat hypertension. Despite years of research the immediate physiologic response to its implementation was never characterized.This translational trial describes the biological pathway from nutrition through hormons, urine electrolytes and blood pressure reduction. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A single center interventional trial. Stage 1 hypertensive otherwise healthy volunteers were admitted for 14-days, transitioning from American style diet to DASH diet. Nutritional habits were assessed with food frequency questionnaires, and menus designed according to the guidelines of the National Heart Blood and Lung Institute (NHBLI) of the National Institute of Health (NIH). Data were collected daily for vital signs, blood and urine. Participants completed two 24-hour ABPM on days 1,10, and two 24-hour urine collections in parallel. We conducted a follow up visit two weeks after discharge. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 9 volunteers (78% male, 89% Black individuals) completed the protocol. During an inpatient stay, they consumed a mean daily potassium intake of 5.6 g (±0.7g) and 2.6 g (±0.3g) of Sodium. Serum Aldosterone increased from day 0 (mean 8.3, range 2.8-18.9) to day 5 (mean 17.8, range 10.2-27.2) after intervention, and decreased on day 11 (mean 11.5, range 4.8-18.2) despite continuous exposure (p-value=0.002). The urine electrolyte ratio of ([Na]/[K]) decreased from a mean of 3.5 before intervention to 1.16 on day 4, creating a statistically significant slope (p-value<0.001). Blood pressure by 24-hour ABPM decreased by 3.7 mmHg systolic BP and 2.3 mmHg diastolic BP from day 1 to 10 for the entire period, and for measures taken during sleep or awake time, assessed separately. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Shifting from a high-sodium low-potassium diet to the opposite composition leads to serial physiological changes that are governed by aldosterone and result in blood pressure reduction. Urine electrolyte ratio reflects nutritional changes within 4 days of transition and should guide clinicians in assessing lifestyle modification adherence.

Objectives/Goals: To assess the impact of the MATCH Program on mentees and mentors over the years, we have surveyed both groups on the effectiveness of the mentorship process, how the MATCH program influenced mentees’ future career plans, and their ongoing interest in clinical research. Methods/Study Population: To evaluate impact on mentees and mentors in the most recent cycle, we fielded two program evaluation surveys, for mentors and mentees. The surveys were distributed and collected using Qualtrics in May 2024. The mentee survey collected data on relationship with mentors, quality of mentorship, future career/education plans, and self-assessment of the program impact. The mentor survey collected data on relationship with mentees, mentees’ engagement, and a self-assessment of the program impact. Qualitative analysis was conducted to determine key themes expressed by participants. The responses were compared to assess the effectiveness of the mentoring relationship from both parties. Results/Anticipated Results: Respondents included 15/20 (75%) mentees and 15/20 (75%) mentors. All mentees (100%) and mentors (100%) stated they would like to continue their relationship outside of the program. The majority of mentees 13/15 (87%) and mentors 13/25 (87%) also viewed their mentee/mentor relationship to be excellent or good. Most mentors 10/15 (67%) stated it was their first time serving as a mentor for the program. Mentees also found their experience in the program very beneficial with 6/15 (40%) stating that MATCH changed their career plans. In addition, most mentees 14/15 (93%) indicated that they are community college or four-year college/university bound. Most mentees 11/15 (73%) indicated an interest in pursuing a health or medical career. Also, 10/15 (67%) mentees stated an interest in pursuing a career in research. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Both mentees and mentors have benefited from the program’s daisy chain mentoring and the program has helped facilitate a potential lifelong mentorship between mentees and mentors. The program also demonstrates promise of developing a pre-health pathway for historically underrepresented students in STEM.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To assess barriers and recommendations for improving delivery of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in rural clinics, we assessed COPD care metrics and obtained perspectives of primary care providers (PCPs) who practice in rural clinics. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Quantitative retrospective analysis of patients with COPD using VA data. We included patients whose primary care clinic is located in a rural VA Midwest Health Care Network (HCN) facility and quantified binary measures for receipt of: spirometry, pulmonary specialty care, and optimal inhaler therapy (regimen with LAMA or LABA monotherapy) Qualitative semi-structured individual interviews of PCPs (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) whose clinics are located in a rural VA Midwest HCN facility. We elicited perceived barriers to and recommendations for receiving spirometry, pulmonary specialty care, and optimal inhaler therapy from PCPs. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 6,350 rural patients had a new diagnosis of COPD in 2016-2019. 48.4% had spirometry, 14.4% had pulmonary encounters, and among patients who were prescribed long-acting inhaler therapy, 48.8% received optimal inhaler regimens. Rural PCPs (n=14) highlighted lack of access to spirometry, pulmonary specialty care, and clinic staff support in local clinics and suggested: 1) leveraging the expertise of pharmacists in COPD management and 2) improving access to resources, including use of telehealth technologies. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Less than 50% of rural COPD patients received recommended diagnostic testing and therapy. Resource limitations in rural clinics were the main barrier. The main recommendation was to leverage pharmacists’ expertise in COPD care. These findings provide a pathway forward to improving rural COPD care.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Develop a plain language informed consent template that met IRB and regulatory requirements. Evaluate the effectiveness of the template at improving the readability of informed consents. Field test the informed consent with low health literacy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a retrospective analysis of over 200 UAMS IRB approved, investigator initiated informed consents from 2013 to 2015 to determine the readability before intervention. The mean grade level readabilities were derived from the results of 3 readability formulas (Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG, and Fry) using open-source readability tools. A plain language informed consent template that meets IRB and regulatory requirements was developed, adhering to health literacy best practices for written communication. The template was made available to investigators as an optional resource, and IRB committees were trained on use of the template. In addition, a focus group will be conducted to qualitatively assess understandability of the template with study participants identified as having inadequate health literacy. Data analysis will include readability assessment of IRB approved informed consents post intervention with and without use of the plain language template, as well as qualitative feedback from focus group participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The retrospective analysis revealed a mean readability of 10th grade for IRB approved informed consents from 2013 to 2015 (n=217). The readability of the developed plain language template was 5th grade. Preliminary post-intervention results show adoption of the template by investigators (n=16) resulted in informed consents with a mean readability of 7th grade (range 6–9th grade), compared to a mean of 10th grade (range 7–11th grade) for the comparator (“no adoption” group, n=24). Data collection will continue through May 2017. The focus group is forthcoming and results will be included in the poster. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Low health literacy is common in individuals with healthcare disparities and can limit their participation in clinical research. Few studies have examined interventions to address this barrier to research. Preliminary results of this study support the utilization of a plain language informed consent template in investigator-initiated research. Moreover, this study demonstrates the importance of stakeholder engagement among CTSA leadership, health literacy experts, the institutional review board, investigators, and research subjects in the development and testing of this intervention to make informed consents “understandable to the subject” while containing all required elements.

ABSTRACT IMPACT: Points to strategies to de-implement ineffective, harmful, or unproven practices, lowering burden and cost of healthcare, using evidence-based recommendations on low value care. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Ineffective, harmful, or unproven practices add burden and cost of healthcare. In national efforts to de-implement low value care (LVC), Choosing Wisely ®campaign generated 25 recommendations through the American Academy of Nursing (CW AAN). Our study described nurse-awareness of CW AAN recommendations as requisite toward de-implementing LVC. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A multi-stakeholder state action coalition led the project to achieve the Institute of Medicine Future of Nursing goals by describing nurse awareness of CW AAN recommendations. The survey was the first among nursing professionals. Use of human subjects was approved at the lead university. Registered Nurse contact information was obtained from the state Board of Nursing of a large mid-South state. Qualtrics ®surveys patterned after the CW survey of physicians’ awareness were administered online by the state Center for Nursing Workforce Studies. Content experts developed 2 surveys’‘ one for Registered Nurses (RNs) and one for Advance Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs)’‘ to account for differences in scope of practice. Surveys assessed current knowledge and perception of the Choosing Wisely ®AAN campaign. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Over six weeks, 374 nurses participated (295 RNs and 79 APRNs). About half of each group indicated that unnecessary nursing care was a ‘somewhat serious problem.’ Only 21% of RNs and 26% of APRNs were aware of Choosing Wisely ®AAN recommendations. Participants identified reasons for the prevalence of low value care in practice as being concerns about malpractice issues, lack of time with patients for meaningful discussion, ‘just to be safe,’ and patients insisting on getting the test or procedure. For the RN group, cost of LVC was rarely discussed; in the APRN group, cost was frequently discussed. Of the APRNs who were aware of CW, 90% believe the recommendations were helpful. When asked for LVC de-implementation suggestions, 78% said EBP recommendations would be effective; at the same time, 20% had low knowledge of EBP. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: RNs and APRNs reported low awareness of CW AAN advice. While representative, sample size limits generalization. De-implementation in learning health systems will include socioecological strategies focused on provider awareness and confidence, patient preference, cost, strength of evidence, and safe work culture to diffuse fear of litigation.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In line with NCATS funding requirements, the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR) established a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process and used the process to guide the implementation of a benchmarking project to evaluate and set goals for MICHR’s production of Clinical and Translational Science manuscripts. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We aimed to increase the number of Clinical and Translational Science papers MICHR produces and to set a reasonable goal for improvement. Benchmarking was used to obtain a baseline and inform the identification of a reasonable goal for improvement. 11 Peer institutions were identified with similar funding levels. 1,225 Publications from 2022 for all 12 CTSAs were obtained from NIH Reporter. All publications were reviewed by title to identify probable CTS content. Two staff reviewers confirmed a total of 108 CTS publications across all CTSAs, and coded each paper to characterize the theoretical approach, method (quantitative and/or qualitative), analytic method and topic. All publications that were selected for benchmarking were also tracked and compared using Altmetrics for Institutions and Overton platforms. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 108 CTS publications were produced by 12 benchmarked CTSAs in 2022; of those, 70% (77) regarded research infrastructure, 37% (41) regarded research methods, and 15% (16) regarded clinical care. Over half, 53% (58), of the benchmarked papers are empirical research papers; of those, 67% (39) used quantitative methods, 28% (16) used qualitative methods, and 5% (3) used mixed methods. A clear majority of the benchmarked papers, 70% (76), provided only descriptive analyses, 18% (19) provided inferential analyses, and 12% (13) provided predictive analyses. We identified an opportunity to produce more manuscripts with descriptive analyses of research infrastructure. In the long-term, we saw an opportunity to produce predictive analyses of translational initiatives designed to impact clinical care. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The benchmarking results helped MICHR identify goals for its production of Clinical and Translational Science to fill gaps in the field. Expanding the scope of this benchmarking project might achieve greater interrater reliability using larger representative sets of publications drawn from institutions across the CTSA Consortium.

The Expanded Program for Immunization Consortium – Human Immunology Project Consortium study aims to employ systems biology to identify and characterize vaccine-induced biomarkers that predict immunogenicity in newborns. Key to this effort is the establishment of the Data Management Core (DMC) to provide reliable data and bioinformatic infrastructure for centralized curation, storage, and analysis of multiple de-identified “omic” datasets. The DMC established a cloud-based architecture using Amazon Web Services to track, store, and share data according to National Institutes of Health standards. The DMC tracks biological samples during collection, shipping, and processing while capturing sample metadata and associated clinical data. Multi-omic datasets are stored in access-controlled Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) for data security and file version control. All data undergo quality control processes at the generating site followed by DMC validation for quality assurance. The DMC maintains a controlled computing environment for data analysis and integration. Upon publication, the DMC deposits finalized datasets to public repositories. The DMC architecture provides resources and scientific expertise to accelerate translational discovery. Robust operations allow rapid sharing of results across the project team. Maintenance of data quality standards and public data deposition will further benefit the scientific community.

The success of clinical research studies depends on effective recruitment and retention of study participants, yet only a small fraction of patients engage in research studies, even in academic health systems. Increasing awareness of research opportunities and facilitating connections with clinical research study teams would help to improve the success of research programs. In this Special Communications, we describe the creation and evolution of and tools used for the My Research Partners Concierge Service (MRPcs) of an academic health system. The MRPcs provides a centralized point of contact or hub for patients and community members, as well as clinical research organizations and academic partners, who have research-related questions or interests. The MRPcs helps to connect the users of the service with relevant research study teams, personnel, or resources to facilitate their engagement in a clinical research program. Our experience with the MRPcs informs our recommendation that peer institutions organize similar research service hubs for their clinical research programs to help increase awareness of and participation in clinical research by the public and to help increase the success of research programs at fulfilling their ultimate goal of improving the health of their population.

The hidden curriculum (HC), or implicit norms and values within a field or institution, affects faculty at all career stages. This study surveyed affiliates of a junior faculty training program (n = 12) to assess the importance of HC topics for junior faculty, mentors, and institutional leaders. For non-diverse junior faculty and their mentors, work-life balance, research logistics, and resilience were key HC topics. Coping with bias and assertive communication were emphasized for diverse junior faculty and mentors. Institutional norms and vision were essential for leaders, while networking was important for all groups. Future research should explore HC needs and potential interventions.