OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our aim is to understand the role bilirubin oxidation products play in the development of cerebral vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. We aim to evaluate the time course of bilirubin, HO-1, and SOD1 in relation to the subsequent development of vasospasm in to establish predictors of vasospasm development. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Prospective cohort observational study involving collection of CSF samples of pts admitted to KU NeuroICU with SAH and placement of EVD. CSF will be extracted from the EVD of patients on the day of placement of the EVD, and then each subsequent day for a total of 10 days. Bilirubin concentration will be determined by means of spectrophotometry. HO-1 will be measured using a commercially available ELISA kit. Cu/Zn-Superoxide Dismutase will be measured using a commercially available ELISA kit. A review of patients chart will then be performed following discharge from hospital to determine if a diagnosis of vasospasm was made, details of the vasospasm (i.e. symptoms, severity), as well as to obtain demographic data and events occurring during patients admission that could confound statistical analysis. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: First: we will investigate the feasibility of collecting serial CSF samples and processing them for target analyte quantification. We predict that the protocol will yield quality data that will result in insight on the pathophysiology of cerebral vasospasm. Second: we will characterize the changes in target CSF bilirubin breakdown analytes over 10 days. From this we hypothesize that as bilirubin oxidation increases, the propensity for cerebral vasospasm will also increase. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: If there is a clear correlation between formation of bilirubin and increase in HO-1, and SOD1, with the clinical signs of vasospasm, this could be used as a biomarker for not only identifying patients at risk for developing these complications but also a means to follow the effectiveness of potential therapies.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Immediate negative impact of the COVID pandemic on CTSA T trainees and K scholars was reported in 2020 to be lack of access to research facilities, clinics, human subjects, and team members, and a need for homeschooling. In this study we examined in more detail the perceived impact of the COVID pandemic on training and career development three years later. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: CTSA T trainees and K scholars were surveyed in May-June 2023 to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training and career development. Data were included from 309 T trainees and K scholars appointed in 2018-2023 at 50 institutions, with good representation from states that were heavily impacted by COVID. Respondents included 76 past and 64 current T trainees, and 56 past and 113 current K scholars. There were no significant differences in race, ethnicity, or gender between T and K respondents. Significantly more K scholars reported both being married or in a committed relationship, and having children. Survey items included the same questions asked in the 2020 survey, plus additional new questions. Results compare impact for T trainees and K scholars. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: K scholars were more negatively impacted for access to clinic/human subjects, home environment, child care, access to staff, increased clinical responsibilities, and other hospital service. T trainees and K scholars reported higher positive impact than in 2020, for having more time to think/write and develop new research ideas. About 2/3 of respondents reported returning to research full-time by April 2021, and the remaining by August 2021. Lasting changes in career progression or research direction were reported as both positive and negative (48%), negative (25%), or positive (10%). Most (2/3) respondents in faculty positions reported that a time extension was available for promotion and/or tenure. Additional in-depth analysis will be presented, based on qualitative analysis of open-ended questions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite research shutdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that lasted for about a year, CTSA T trainees and K scholars were remarkably resilient. They were able to continue some research activities and professional development activities, and developed strategies to maintain productivity and minimize impact on their training duration.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Limited specialty care within safety net health systems reduces availability of follow-up appointments for chronic conditions. We evaluated patient acceptability of a 6 month series of telemedicine group medical visits for chronic migraine at a county hospital-based clinic as a potential method to improve access to specialty care in this setting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We developed and implemented a pilot program of monthly physician-led telemedicine group visits to provide routine follow-up care for adults with chronic migraine. Visits were conducted through the neurology clinic at LAC+USC medical center, a safety net hospital in Los Angeles and included an educational component, peer support, and the opportunity to address individual needs or refill medications. We assessed headache severity (HIT-6) and mood (PHQ-9) through telephone surveys before and 6 months after patients’ first telemedicine group visit and compared timepoints using paired t-tests. Patient acceptability of the group visits was elicited through focus groups and key themes identified using grounded field theory. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Baseline data was available for 18/20 pilot participants. Patients were predominantly female (89%) with mean age of 46 (SD 8.6). Mean HIT-6 was 65/78 reflecting a very severe impact on daily life, and mean PHQ-9 was 8.7 reflecting mild depressive symptoms. There was no statistically significant change in either HIT-6 (mean difference 2.36, p=0.34) or PHQ-9 (mean difference 2.09, p=0.12) after group participation. Key themes from the focus groups included lack of prior exposure to other people with similar headache burden and logistical barriers to care, such as difficulty contacting a provider or extended clinic wait times. Primary patient-reported benefits included more frequent access to a provider and peer support. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Telemedicine group visits for chronic migraine are feasible in a safety net context and were well-received by patients. However, this pilot study did not show a benefit of telemedicine group visits for headache control or mood symptoms.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Although referrals for specialty consultations are a core clinical process, they are prone to coordination and communication breakdowns that have led to adverse clinical outcomes. This project’s objective is to improve timely documentation, transmission, access, and quality of consultation notes across healthcare systems. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: There are two specific aims for this project. In Aim 1, we will characterize clinical workflows and information flow during cross-institutional referrals. In Aim 2, we will develop and test a prototype leveraging electronic health information exchange (HIE) to increase closing the loop for cross-institutional referrals and improve the quality of consultation notes. To accomplish these aims, we will use human factors methods, including data analytics, medical-record reviews, semi-structured interviews of consultants, rapid prototyping, and usability evaluations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results will inform the design and integration of clinician-facing technologies into clinical workflows to close the referral loop and improve diagnostic processes. Aim 1 will provide quantitative evidence about the quality of cross-institutional referrals, inform the eventual implementation of our prototype, and identify user interface features required for successful electronic health information exchange. Based on the results from Aim 1, reports and visual representations will be generated to illustrate information flows and clinical workflows. This will prioritize design efforts for the intervention’s prototype. Aim 2 will translate clinicians’ requirements into prototype features and assess clinicians’ experience with the prototype. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The use and usefulness of HIE has been limited due to usability and implementation issues. Cross-institutional referrals are complex and dependent on HIE due to EHRs’ lack of interoperability. This project will provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) to improve HIE during referrals.

ABSTRACT IMPACT: We explored the use of machine learning to explore how multi-pollutant air quality is related to type 2 diabetes, which is more representative than the single pollutant models often employed to assess this relationship. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Single pollutant air pollution models have correlated air pollution components with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, air pollution is a complex mixture, therefore, we explored the relationship between multi-pollutant air quality and DM incidence using machine learning. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Annual diabetes incidence from the CDC for each US county was downloaded for the years 2007-2016. Daily air pollution concentrations for PM2.5, PM10, CO, SO2, NO2, and O3 were downloaded from the US EPA for the years 2006-2015. K-means clustering, an unsupervised machine learning method, was employed to partition all air pollution components, for each day and county monitored, into the optimal number of clusters. Change in DM incidence was matched to air pollution clusters by county, lagged by one year. Additionally, NASA satellite-derived air pollution data will be compared to EPA data to inspect as a potential source for future clustering analysis of counties that do not have an EPA monitor. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The largest increase of annual DM incidence was associated with the cluster having the highest average PM10, PM2.5, and CO, and the second greatest average NO2 concentrations. Inversely, the most significant decrease of annual DM incidence was associated with the cluster having the lowest PM10, PM2.5, and CO. While average PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, and CO showed a rising tendency with elevating change of DM incidence, ozone did not show any such trend. It is anticipated that the NASA satellite-derived air pollution data will approximate the EPA air quality data and will be usable in assessing the air pollution-DM relationship for areas currently not monitored by the EPA. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Using an unsupervised k-means algorithm, we showed multiple ambient air components were related to increased incidence of T2DM even when average concentrations were below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. This work could help guide policy making regarding air quality standards in the future.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The first goal of this project is to test the reliability and validity of an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) that was designed to assess competency in clinical and translational research. The second goal is to evaluate the impact of MICHR’s Summer Research Program on the participating trainee’s competency development. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The methodology used for this study was reviewed and exempted from oversight by the U-M Institutional Review Board (HUM00113293). The participants in the study include 17 pre-doctoral students in health professions programs at U-M who participated MICHR’s Summer Research Program. The Research OSCE was administered using a pretest, post-test design. The pretest was administered once during the 1st week of program in the Summer of 2016 and the post-test during the 10th week of the program. The Research OSCE was proctored and rated by trained staff members. We will assess the reliability of the Research OSCE using Generalizability Theory (Webb et al., 2006). And the construct validity of the Research OSCE will be tested using factor analysis and other statistical analyses. Growth in the competence of the trainees participating in the Summer Research program will be evaluated by testing for significant differences between their pretest and post-test scores. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that this study will show that the Research OSCE is a reliable competency assessment with proven construct validity. We also anticipate that the use of the Research OSCE will show the trainees participating in the Summer Research program experienced a gain in competence during the course of the 10-week program. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This project uses a common and standardized testing approach. The primary goal of this project is to evaluate the reliability and validity of an OSCE to assess competency in clinical and translational research. It represents a new application for a well-studied testing method used extensively in the health professions to assess the clinical competency of health practitioners. This project will lead to a better understanding of (a) the reliability and validity of the Research OSCE designed to test research competency and (b) the effectiveness of the Summer Research Program curriculum in better preparing participants to conduct clinical and translational research. Showing how a specific competency assessment can be used for this purpose will provide the administrators, evaluators, and other stakeholders of clinical and translational research training programs with information that can be used to design more rigorous and relevant evaluations of their research training programs.

Objectives/Goals: Effective research relies on a well-trained study coordinator workforce, but mentorship programs are lacking. Retaining and empowering career development for skilled research staff is challenging. To address this, the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research launched the STEP.up program. Methods/Study Population: The Staff Enrichment Program for Research Professionals (STEP.up) was created in 2018. To increase knowledge and awareness of our program, we developed an implementation guide to share best practices and open access to our program structure and content. We identified seven critical elements integral to program success. The implementation guide provides a description and rationale for these elements. We partnered with an instructional designer to build a descriptive and easy-to-use guide that describes insights into the successful implementation of the program, practical strategies for program management, and adaptable resources for institutions to use and tailor to their unique needs. Results/Anticipated Results: In the STEP.up program, early career, new-to-role, or new-to-organization research staff members are paired with senior research professionals in a 9-month structured mentorship and career development experience to promote professional development, job satisfaction, and retention for individuals currently working as research professionals. Of the 82 participants from 2018 to 2024, 76 (93%) have remained in their roles as study coordinators. The STEP.up program implementation guide provides the tools, resources, and insights senior research professionals need to implement this program successfully at their sites. Discussion/Significance of Impact: STEP.up program materials are available as an open-source resource on the DIAMOND portal. This resource can encourage others to invest in structured mentorship for research professionals to help establish a culture of growth and cultivate a resilient, skilled, and committed research workforce.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Given the heightened risk for suicide seen in individuals with PTSD+MDD, this report explored the effect of repeated ketamine infusions on SI in a cohort of veterans. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Veterans with PTSD+MDD (n = 15) received six intravenous infusions of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine on a Monday-Wednesday-Friday schedule over a 12-day period. All subjects endorsed SI at baseline. Outcome measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score, MADRS suicidal ideation item, and PTSD symptom Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) subscales (intrusion, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and marked alterations in arousal and reactivity), and visual analog scale of pain. Measures were collected immediately before and 24-hours after each infusion. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Significant improvement in SI was observed 24-hours after the first infusion (Z = 3.21; p = .001) and remained significantly improved at all other post-infusion time points. Improvement in SI at the conclusion of the infusion series was significantly correlated with PTSD subscales of avoidance (r(12) = .610, p = .021), negative alterations in cognition and mood (r(12) = .786, p = .001), alterations in arousal and reactivity (r(12) = .729, p = .003), and pain (r(12) = .591, p = .013), even when controlling for improvement in symptoms of depression. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The present analysis provides evidence of improvement in SI in a cohort of veterans with PTSD+MDD. Improvements in suicidality were correlated with PTSD symptom subscales and pain independent of improvement in depression. This report extends the interpersonal theory of suicide as it applies to posttraumatic pathology by demonstrating a significant association between improvements in all subclusters of PTSD, improvement in pain and improvement in suicidal ideation.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Older adults are affected by insufficient access to digital technology including digital healthcare. The aim of this program is to improve digital literacy in elders who were not using digital devices due to age and socioeconomic inequities. We provided technology and education on topics relevant but not limited to navigating health care. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Through partnerships with a non-profit organization helping elders to age well and independently (cohort 1 ongoing n=9) and an urban place of worship (cohort 2 starting), we reached out to elders residing in urban Buffalo, NY’s poorest zip codes. Participants received free tablets and Wi-fi hotspots. Participants received weekly interactive sessions over 6 months at their apartments or a place they felt comfortable with. A curriculum was developed but the sessions were not limited to digital health care, rather were also tailored to other individual needs like shopping on line, communication with loved ones, etc. A baseline, mid and post survey were administered to assess needs before the program and measure the impact of the program. An effort was also deployed in identifying a source of connectivity post program. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The participants were elders who did not have computer/digital knowledge and/or access to the digital world. Mid-intervention data show that 9/9 used the tablets, learned basic skills and felt more comfortable/confident using a digital device. 5/9 participants used their hotspots and the remaining learned to use Wi-Fi provided by the facility they live in. While at baseline only 1/9 participants had attempted to use patient portals, mid-intervention data showed that 8/9 accessed portals. Importantly, the participants are also using other digital functions essential to their well-being including streaming, shopping, bill paying, and communicating with loved ones. Preliminary post-surveys suggest that all participants now rate their internet literacy and web searching skills at an acceptable/good level. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Tailored support and access to technology led to uptake of digital technology among elders, enabling them to access health-related resources and other web activities which improved their quality of life and led to digital equity. This project can be leveraged to obtain funding to train trusted members of the community as digital literacy ambassadors.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To examine the racial/ethnic variation in the relation between metabolic syndrome (MetS) components and cardiovascular disease (CVD) as well as examine the role of uric acid as a predictor of CVD among population with MetS. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We analyzed National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys data (1999–2010) for adults aged >20 years with MetS. Using the ATP III clinical criteria for diagnosing MetS, subjects were classified as having MetS if they had ≥3 of the following: waist circumference ≥40 inches for men or ≥35 inches for women, triglyceride ≥150 mg/dL, HDL-C for men ≤40 mg/dL; women ≤50 mg/dL, pre-hypertension, or fasting glucose ≥110 mg/dL. We used multiple logistic regression in STATA 14 survey module to examine the relation between MetS components and CVD adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, alcohol, albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate, C-reactive protein, uric acid and white blood count. To assess the racial/ethnic variation, we examined the same model in each race/ethnic group. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the 3212 subjects, 78% were Whites, 10% were Blacks, and 15% had CVD. MetS components, CVD, and uric acid varied significantly by race/ethnicity (p<0.05). In the multivariate model, HDL-C level [odds ratio (OR)=1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1–2.0], triglyceride level (OR=2.0; CI=1.4–2.9), and elevated uric acid (OR=1.4; CI=1.1–1.9) were independently related to CVD (p<0.05). While CVD was independently related to HDL-C, triglyceride, and elevated uric acid in Whites (p<0.05), it was associated with pre-hypertension and triglyceride in Blacks (p<0.05) and no predictors in Hispanics (p>0.05). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Elevated uric acid, HDL-C, and triglyceride levels are significant independent predictors of CVD among population with MetS. These predictors varied by race/ethnicity. Health care providers should be vigilant in the management of MetS components and control of uric acid level in each racial/ethnic group to prevent the CVD risk among the population with MetS.

ABSTRACT IMPACT: Measuring and analyzing qualitative and quantitative traits using phenomics approaches will yield previously unrecognized heart failure subphenotypes and has the potential to improve our knowledge of heart failure pathophysiology, identify novel biomarkers of disease, and guide the development of targeted therapeutics for heart failure. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Current classification schemes fail to capture the broader pathophysiologic heterogeneity in heart failure. Phenomics offers a newer unbiased approach to identify subtypes of complex disease syndromes, like heart failure. The goal of this research is to use data-driven associations to redefine the classification of the heart failure syndrome. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We will identify < 10 subphenotypes of patients with heart failure using unsupervised machine learning approaches for dense multidimensional quantitative (i.e. demographics, comorbid conditions, physiologic measurements, clinical laboratory, imaging, and medication variables; disease diagnosis, procedure, and billing codes) and qualitative data extracted from an integrated health system electronic health record. The heart failure subphenotypes we identify from the integrated health system electronic health record will be replicated in other heart failure population datasets using unsupervised learning approaches. We will explore the potential to establish associations between identified subphenotypes and clinical outcomes (e.g. all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We expect to identify < 10 mutually exclusive phenogroups of patients with heart failure that have differential risk profiles and clinical trajectories. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: We will attempt to derive and validate a data-driven unbiased approach to the categorization of novel phenogroups in heart failure. This has the potential to improve our knowledge of heart failure pathophysiology, identify novel biomarkers of disease, and guide the development of targeted therapeutics for heart failure.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This work develops an algorithm that identifies patients in a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) who should switch treatments prior to the end of a stage because clinical effectiveness via their current intervention is unlikely. This algorithm uses as inputs patient baseline and interim measurements to assign a probability that a patient should switch or stay on their current intervention. First, the algorithm will be derived assuming both a linear and non-linear patient trajectory. Second, the performance of the algorithm will be assessed using trial data from the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care† (EMBARC) study. The primary objective of the algorithm is to switch treatment in patients who will not reach clinical effectiveness by the end of the stage, and the secondary objective is to avoid accidentally switching treatment in patients who will reach clinical effectiveness by the end of the stage. †Trivedi et al. Journal of Psychiatric Research 78 (2016) 11-23 METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: First, the algorithm was derived assuming a linear or non-linear trajectory. Next, performance of the algorithm was assessed using data from the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care† (EMBARC) study. This two-stage SMART design measured the effectiveness of sertraline in 242 patients with nonpsychotic Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The algorithm was applied to baseline and interim measurements from the EMBARC study to predict end-stage Hamilton Depression (HAMD17) scores, the primary outcome of the study. True positive rate (TPR) and false positive rate (FPR) were used to measure respectively the primary study objective (switching treatment in patients who will not reach clinical effectiveness by the end of the stage), and the secondary study objective (avoiding accidentally switching treatment in patients who will reach clinical effectiveness by the end of the stage). TPR and FPR were calculated for the following prediction scenarios: (1) three separate two-point predictions: Baseline and Week 2, Baseline and Week 4, Baseline and Week 6, and (2) a single three-point prediction: Baseline and Weeks 2 and 6. †Trivedi et al. Journal of Psychiatric Research 78 (2016) 11-23 RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: When using two-point prediction, we found TPR to increase and FPR to decrease as the interim measurements approached closer to the end of the stage. We also found TPR to increase when using a three-point prediction, but at the expense of FPR also increasing. Across these scenarios, TPR ranged between 70 and 90%, and FPR ranged between approximately 20 and 50%. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Although SMART designs ultimately assign patients to more effective treatments, this process can take time and leave a patient (currently on an ineffective treatment) waiting until the end of a stage to try a potentially superior treatment. This disadvantage of the SMART design is currently addressed by this algorithm. By introducing a regression and likelihood approach to predict whether a patient should switch or stay on their current treatment, we move closer to the goal of designing rigorous, patient-centered studies. This work has the potential to improve individual clinical outcomes for patients enrolled in pragmatic clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs are launching D&I Science cores to provide resources and services to promote the translation of clinical evidence into practice. We developed a D&I Science Core strategic plan reflecting our research community’s needs by assessing Implementation Science (IS) competencies. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Tufts CTSI D&I Science Core was launched in early 2023. To design services that meet research community needs, we conducted a survey and key informant interviews based on Padek etal.’s list of Implementation Science (IS) competencies. The competencies are organized into four domains (Definition, Background, and Rationale; Theory and Approaches; Design & Analysis; and Practice-Based Considerations) and categorized by expertise level (beginner, intermediate, advanced). Participants who had attended or expressed interest in a D&I interest group were asked via an email survey to rate their level of confidence in completing selected IS-related research activities, about their experience with IS research or practice, and the types of resources, services and training they desired. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Twenty researchers (20/65, 31%) submitted survey responses and six researchers participated in in-depth interviews. Survey respondents felt most confident in engaging stakeholders in IS research and least confident selecting a model or framework for a study. Results suggest that researcher capacity building is needed to: • Understand IS models and frameworks and their approaches, strengths, and limitations • Select and use models and frameworks in studies • Assemble IS teams and prepare grant proposals Suggestions for resources, services, and training, include: • Customized education to address diverse needs, knowledge levels, and learning styles • Promotion of D&I Core consultations and grant support services • Sharing of successful proposals to help researchers learn how to apply IS methods DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: A strategic workplan for the D&I Science Core was developed and implemented to address the findings. Initial emphasis is on developing easily accessible resources and timely consultations for investigators new to IS needing to apply these methods in current grant proposals, while also providing training resources for deeper skill building.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Stakeholder and community engagement (SCE) is a national priority for the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS). An established framework for stakeholder engagement exists for the latter stages (T2-T4) of translational, but no such framework currently exists for early stages of translational science (T1). Four Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs launched a collaboration to develop a new framework for engaging communities and stakeholders in T1 research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We led structured individual and group discussions with T1 investigators to learn about: (1) the health decisions they seek to inform with research evidence, (2) the actors who make those decisions, and (3) the individuals and organizations that are affected by those decisions. In total, 18 individuals connected to 4 CTSA hubs participated in the discussions. Participants came from the fields ranging from basic chemistry and drug development to infectious disease and pediatrics and represented both methodological and topical experts. Focus groups lasted, on average, 1 hour, were audio recorded. Interviews lasted ~30 minutes. Audio recordings were transcribed and deidentified, and transcripts were coded using Dedoose™. We used a deductive-inductive procedure to develop the framework for stakeholder engagement in T1 research. A deductive codebook was development from the focus group and interview guides; emergent themes were added and the codebook was revised after preliminary inductive analysis. Two coders analyzed all transcripts using a constant comparison approach. We used an inductive process to identify themes and form them into a framework that could be used by T1 researchers in their work. The framework was developed through sequential reviews with coauthors and research participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary findings suggest that stakeholders in early stage translational research (T1) do not fit into the same framework as those further down the translational spectrum (T2-T4). Basic scientists can identify stakeholders, however, and would like more guidance on who, how, and when to engage them in their research. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: By showing T1 researchers how to identify and involve their stakeholders in (1) defining research questions, (2) carrying out research activities, and (3) disseminating research evidence, this work has the potential to improve the use of basic science evidence in latter stages of translation from bench to bedside.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Utilizing clinical electronic health record (eHR) data pulled en masse from data warehouses provides unique challenges when applying it to retrospective studies. Use of this data in conjunction with metabolomic and genomic results to predict response to lisinopril or ondansetron has been completed. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Study population consists of >2000 subjects recruited from the Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank at University of Colorado Denver (UCD). All patients presenting to the emergency department are approached to participate which significantly increases demographic diversity of our study populations. Clinical data is pulled from Health Data Compass (data warehouse at UCD that collects all electronic health record (EHR) data to be able to deliver de-identified). Effectiveness of lisinopril and ondansetron were investigated using metabolomic data collected via ultra-high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and genomic data from Illumina chip technology to find relevant correlations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Obtaining retrospective clinical data from data warehouses comes with significant challenges to be addressed. Verifying all clinical variables from patient EHRs is a crucial step that requires extensive quality control steps. As well, ensuring data validity, appropriateness of data points pulled as relate to the study criteria and identifying alternate EHR data points is needed. Chart review is a critical step necessary to surmount these challenges. Additionally, use of retrospective EHR data often necessitates the development of novel definitions of clinical effectiveness that can be abstracted from the EHR– such as how to determine decrease in nausea without a visual analogue scale. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Utilizing data warehouses to deliver EHR data provides a valuable tool for completing retrospective precision medicine projects. The validation of definitions for clinical outcomes identifiable retrospectively are necessary and provide novel guidance for future studies.

We conducted a survey study of clinical research coordinators (CRCs) at the member institutions of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network, to determine the demographic and linguistic characteristics of CRCs around the network, and any perceived impact of those characteristics on their duties. A total of 53/74 CRCs completed the survey. Most respondents identified as “female,” “white,” and “not Hispanic/Latino.” Most respondents felt that their race/ethnicity and their ability to speak a language other than English would positively impact recruitment. Four female respondents felt that their gender hindered their recruitment efforts and their sense of belonging within the research team.