Submissions which, after a first reading, the editors believe to be suitable for inclusion in the journal, are subject to peer review. Articles are reviewed externally in a double-anonymous process. Case notes are reviewed by the editors in a single-anonymous process but may be subject to external double-anonymous review where appropriate. Book reviews are reviewed internally by the editors.

Appeals

Appeals of editorial decisions will only be considered if they refer to a specific manuscript and must be based on evidence that either (1) an editor or reviewer made a significant factual error/a major misunderstanding of a manuscript, or (2) the integrity of the editorial decision making process was compromised.  In general, only one appeal per manuscript per decision stage will be considered. 

To appeal an editorial decision, contact the Editors-in-Chief and specify the reason for your appeal. Your appeal will be reviewed and the final decision regarding your appeal will rest with the Editors-in-Chief. New submissions take priority over appeals, so it may take a substantial period of time for the journal to reach a conclusion about your appeal.