Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T07:29:28.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Pesin theory for Anosov diffeomorphisms and flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2017

SÉBASTIEN GOUËZEL  and
LUCHEZAR STOYANOV
SÉBASTIEN GOUËZEL
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Jean Leray, CNRS UMR 6629, Université de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France email sebastien.gouezel@univ-nantes.fr
LUCHEZAR STOYANOV
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009 WA, Australia email luchezar.stoyanov@uwa.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pesin sets are measurable sets along which the behavior of a matrix cocycle above a measure-preserving dynamical system is explicitly controlled. In uniformly hyperbolic dynamics, we study how often points return to Pesin sets under suitable conditions on the cocycle: if it is locally constant, or if it admits invariant holonomies and is pinching and twisting, we show that the measure of points that do not return a linear number of times to Pesin sets is exponentially small. We discuss applications to the exponential mixing of contact Anosov flows and consider counterexamples illustrating the necessity of suitable conditions on the cocycle.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 159 - 200
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnold, L.. Random Dynamical Systems (Springer Monographs in Mathematics) . Springer, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
Avila, A. and Viana, M.. Simplicity of Lyapunov spectra: a sufficient criterion. Port. Math. (N.S.) 64(3) (2007), 311–376.Google Scholar
Bochi, J. and Viana, M.. The Lyapunov exponents of generic volume-preserving and symplectic maps. Ann. of Math. (2) 161(3) (2005), 1423–1485.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Viana, M.. Lyapunov exponents with multiplicity 1 for deterministic products of matrices. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 24(5) (2004), 1295–1330.Google Scholar
Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470) . Springer, Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar
Dolgopyat, D.. Limit theorems for partially hyperbolic systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), 1637–1689 (electronic).Google Scholar
Faure, F. and Tsujii, M.. The semiclassical zeta function for geodesic flows on negatively curved manifolds. Invent. Math. (2016), doi:10.1007/s00222-016-0701-5.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M. W. and Pugh, C. C.. Smoothness of horocycle foliations. J. Differential Geom. 10 (1975), 225–238.Google Scholar
Liverani, C.. On contact Anosov flows. Ann. of Math. (2) 159 (2004), 1275–1312.Google Scholar
Parry, W. and Pollicott, M.. Zeta functions and the periodic orbit structure of hyperbolic dynamics. Astérisque 187–188 (1990), 1–268.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Ergodic theory of differentiable dynamical systems. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 50(1) (1979), 27–58.Google Scholar
Sarig, O.. Lecture notes on ergodic theory. Lecture Notes, Penn. State University, 2009.Google Scholar
Stoyanov, L.. Spectra of Ruelle transfer operators for axiom A flows. Nonlinearity 24(4) (2011), 1089–1120.Google Scholar
Stoyanov, L.. Pinching conditions, linearization and regularity of axiom A flows. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 33(2) (2013), 391–412.Google Scholar
Stoyanov, L.. Ruelle transfer operators for contact Anosov flows and decay of correlations. Preprint, 2013, arXiv:1301.6855.Google Scholar
Viana, M.. Lectures on Lyapunov Exponents (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 145) . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.Google Scholar