Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Economics & Philosophy
  4. Volume 27
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 27 - March 2011

Contents

Page 2 of 3

Reviews

Book Review

Reviews

Book Review

Reviews

Book Review

Reviews

Erratum

  • AN EXTENDED FRAMEWORK FOR PREFERENCE RELATIONS – ERRATUM

  • Johan E. Gustafsson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 November 2011, p. 359
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • It is regretted that the originally published paper (Gustafsson, 2011a) was not the author's final amended version. We apologise for this oversight and reproduce the entire corrected paper here in print and online, with revised notation.

Addendum

Reviews

Contributors

Other

Articles

  • AN EXTENDED FRAMEWORK FOR PREFERENCE RELATIONS – CORRECTED VERSION

  • Johan E. Gustafsson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 November 2011, pp. 360-367

  • It is regretted that the originally published paper (doi:10.1017/S0266267111000010, published online 22 June 2011) was not the author's final amended version. We apologise for this oversight and reproduce the entire corrected paper here in print and online, with revised notation.

    In order to account for non-traditional preference relations the present paper develops a new, richer framework for preference relations. This new framework provides characterizations of non-traditional preference relations, such as incommensurateness and instability, that may hold when neither preference nor indifference do. The new framework models relations with swaps, which are conceived of as transfers from one alternative state to another. The traditional framework analyses dyadic preference relations in terms of a hypothetical choice between the two compared alternatives. The swap framework extends this approach by analysing dyadic preference relations in terms of two hypothetical choices: the choice between keeping the first of the compared alternatives or swapping it for the second; and the choice between keeping the second alternative or swapping it for the first.

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • EAP volume 27 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    22 June 2011, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Other

Contributors

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • EAP volume 27 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 November 2011, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 2 of 3