Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-6lqsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T15:17:35.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short proof of the hypergraph container theorem

Part of: Graph theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2025

Rajko Nenadov  and
Huy Tuan Pham
Rajko Nenadov
Affiliation:
School of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Huy Tuan Pham*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, USA
*
Corresponding author: Huy Tuan Pham; Email: htpham@caltech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a short and simple proof of the celebrated hypergraph container theorem of Balogh–Morris–Samotij and Saxton–Thomason. On a high level, our argument utilises the idea of iteratively taking vertices of largest degree from an independent set and constructing a hypergraph of lower uniformity which preserves independent sets and inherits edge distribution. The original algorithms for constructing containers also remove in each step vertices of high degree, which are not in the independent set. Our modified algorithm postpones this until the end, which surprisingly results in a significantly simplified analysis.

Keywords

Hypergraph containersindependent sets

MSC classification

Primary: 05C30: Enumeration in graph theory 05C65: Hypergraphs 05C69: Dominating sets, independent sets, cliques
Secondary: 05C35: Extremal problems
Type
Paper
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , First View , pp. 1 - 4
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Balogh, J., Morris, R. and Samotij, W. (2015) Independent sets in hypergraphs. J. Am. Math. Soc. 28(3) 669–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, J., Morris, R. and Samotij, W. (2018) The method of hypergraph containers. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2018, ICM 2018, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 1–9, 2018, Vol. IV Invited lectures, World Scientific, Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática (SBM), Brazil, Hackensack, NJ-Rio de Janeiro, pp. 3059–3092.Google Scholar
Balogh, J. and Samotij, W. (2020) An efficient container lemma. Discrete Anal. 2020 56, Id/No 17.Google Scholar
Bernshteyn, A., Delcourt, M., Towsner, H. and Tserunyan, A. (2019) A short nonalgorithmic proof of the containers theorem for hypergraphs. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 147(4) 1739–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucić, M., Fox, J. and Pham, H. T. (2024) Equivalence between Erdős-Hajnal and polynomial Rödl and Nikiforov conjectures, arXiv: 2403.08303.Google Scholar
Campos, M. and Samotij, W. (2024) Towards an optimal hypergraph container lemma, arXiv: 2408.06617.Google Scholar
Morris, R., Samotij, W. and Saxton, D. (2024) An asymmetric container lemma and the structure of graphs with no induced 4-cycle. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 26(5) 1655–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenadov, R. (2024) Probabilistic hypergraph containers. Israel J. Math. 261(2) 879–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, D. and Thomason, A. (2015) Hypergraph containers. Invent. Math. 201(3) 925–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, D. and Thomason, A. (2016) Online containers for hypergraphs, with applications to linear equations. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B. 121 248–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, D. and Thomason, A. (2016) Simple containers for simple hypergraphs. Comb. Probab. Comput. 25(3) 448–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar