Most dynamic ice-sheet studies currently use either empirically basedparameterizations or simple energy-balance climate models for the surfacemass-balance forcing. If three-dimensional global climate models (GCMs)could be used instead, they would greatly improve the potential realism ofcoupled climate ice-sheet simulations. However, there are two seriousproblems in simulating realistic mass balances on ice sheets from GCMsimulations: (i) dynamic ice-sheet models and the underlying bedrocktopography need horizontal resolution of 50–100 km or less, but the finestpractical resolution of atmospheric GCMs is currently ˜250 km, and (ii) GCMsurface physics usually neglects the local refreezing of meltwater on icesheets.
Two techniques are described that address these problems: an elevationcorrection applied to the atmospheric GCM fields interpolated to theice-sheet grid, and a refreezing correction involving the annual totals ofsnowfall, rainfall and local melt at each grid-point. As an example of theiruse, we have used the GENESIS version 2 GCM at 3.75° × 3.75° resolution tosimulate the climate at the end of the last interglaciation at ˜116 000years ago. The atmospheric climate is then used to drive a standardtwo-dimensional dynamic ice-sheet model for 10 000 years on a 0.5° × 0.5°grid spanning northern North America. The model successfully predictsice-sheet initiation over the Baffin Island highlands and the CanadianArchipelago, but at a slower rate than observed. A large ice sheet nucleatesand grows rapidly over the northwestern Rockies, in conflict with geologicevidence. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are discussed.