To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
My intention in this textbook is to provide a self-contained exposition of the fundamentals and applications of statistical thermodynamics for beginning graduate students in the engineering sciences. Especially within engineering, most students enter a course in statistical thermodynamics with limited exposure to statistics, quantum mechanics, and spectroscopy. Hence, I have found it necessary over the years to “start from the beginning,” not leaving out intermediary steps and presuming little knowledge in the discrete, as compared to the continuum, domain of physics. Once these things are done carefully, I find that good graduate students can follow the ideas, and that they leave the course excited and satisfied with their newfound understanding of both statistical and classical thermodynamics.
Nevertheless, a first course in statistical thermodynamics remains challenging and sometimes threatening to many graduate students. Typically, all their previous experience is with the equations of continuum mechanics, whether applied to thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, or heat transfer. For most students, therefore, the mathematics of probability theory, the novelty of quantum mechanics, the confrontation with entropy, and indeed the whole new way of thinking that surrounds statistical thermodynamics are all built-in hills that must be climbed to develop competence and confidence in the subject. For this reason, although I introduce the ensemble method at the beginning of the book, I have found it preferable to build on the related Maxwell–Boltzmann method so that novices are not confronted immediately with the conceptual difficulties of ensemble theory.
To this point, we have dealt exclusively with systems composed of independent particles and thus we have utilized the Maxwell–Boltzmann method of statistical thermodynamics. We know, however, that at a sufficiently high pressure or low temperature any gas will begin demonstrating nonideal behavior. For such real gases, and also for liquids, centralized forces arise among constituent particles owing to shorter intermolecular distances. Consequently, we are eventually confronted with systems composed of dependent rather than independent particles. Such systems mandate that we forsake the Maxwell–Boltzmann method and turn instead to a more robust computational procedure known as the Gibbs or ensemble method of statistical thermodynamics.
The Ensemble Method
We recall from Section 3.2 that an ensemble is a mental collection of a huge number of identical systems, each of which replicates macroscopically the thermodynamic system under investigation. Because such replication occurs at the macroscopic and not at the microscopic level, every member of the ensemble may be associated with a possibly different system quantum state. In essence, the independent particles required for the Maxwell–Boltzmann method are replaced with independent systems for the ensemble method. As a result, when using the latter, we inherently retain independent events proffered for statistical analyses, while accounting for the intermolecular forces needed to model real gases and liquids. In so doing, we shift our focus from a consideration of particle quantum states to a consideration of system quantum states.
As discussed previously, the utility of the Gibbs method rests on two fundamental postulates of statistical thermodynamics.
We found in the previous chapter that the molecular partition function is required to determine the thermodynamic properties of an ideal gas. To evaluate the partition function, specification of pertinent energy levels and degeneracies is necessary. Such knowledge demands that we investigate at least the rudiments of quantum mechanics, and especially those quantum concepts required for subsequent applications to statistical thermodynamics. For this reason, we concentrate in the next few chapters on the Schrödinger wave equation, whose various solutions provide the εj's and gj's needed for the eventual calculation of thermodynamic properties. Depending on your academic background, you might thus consider reviewing classical mechanics (Appendix G) and operator theory (Appendix H) in preparation for your upcoming study of quantum mechanics.
We begin this chapter with a historical review of the developments leading to the formulation of quantum mechanics, subsequently focusing on the Bohr model for atomic hydrogen and the de Broglie hypothesis for matter waves. We then introduce the Schrödinger wave equation, the basic postulates of quantum mechanics, and salient insights from these postulates germane to the development of statistical thermodynamics. We next apply the Schrödinger wave equation to the translation energy mode of an atom or molecule. This application conveniently explains both quantum states and quantum numbers, including their relation to our previous notions of microstate and macrostate. We end this chapter by discussing the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, including its utility in defining indistinguishability and symmetry conditions for multiparticle systems.
As indicated in Chapter 18, ensemble theory is especially germane when calculating thermodynamic properties for systems composed of dependent rather than independent particles. Potential applications include real gases, liquids, and polymers. In this chapter, we focus on the thermodynamic properties of nonideal gases. Our overall approach is to develop an equation of state using the grand canonical ensemble. From classical thermodynamics, equilibrium properties can always be determined by suitably operating on such equations of state. As shown later in this chapter, typical evaluations require an accurate model for the intermolecular forces underlying any macroscopic assembly. This requirement is endemic to all applications of ensemble theory, including those for liquids and polymers. As a matter of fact, by mastering the upcoming procedures necessary for the statistics of real gases, you should be prepared for many pertinent applications to other tightly-coupled thermodynamic systems.
The Behavior of Real Gases
As the density of a gas rises, its constituent particles interact more vigorously so that their characteristic intermolecular potential exercises a greater influence on macroscopic behavior. Accordingly, the gas becomes less ideal and more real; i.e., its particles eventually display greater contingency owing to enhanced intermolecular forces. This deviation from ideal behavior is reflected through a more complicated equation of state for real gases.
An equation of state, you recall, describes a functional relation among the pressure, specific volume, and temperature of a given substance.
Large-eddy simulations (LESs) of turbulent flows are extremely powerful techniques consisting in the elimination of scales smaller than some scale Δx by a proper low-pass filtering to enable suitable evolution equations for the large scales to be written. The latter maintain an intense spatio-temporal variability. Large-eddy simulation (LES) poses a very difficult theoretical problem of subgrid-scale modeling, that is, how to account for small-scale dynamics in the large-scale motion equations. LES is an invaluable tool for deciphering the vortical structure of turbulence, since it allows us to capture deterministically the formation and ulterior evolution of coherent vortices and structures. It also permits the prediction of numerous statistics associated with turbulence and induced mixing. LES applies to extremely general turbulent flows (isotropic, free-shear, wall-bounded, separated, rotating, stratified, compressible, chemically reacting, multiphase, magnetohydrodynamic, etc.). LES has contributed to a blooming industrial development in the aerodynamics of cars, trains, and planes; propulsion, turbo-machinery; thermal hydraulics; acoustics; and combustion. An important application lies in the possibility of simulating systems that allow turbulence control, which will be a major source of energy savings in the future. LES also has many applications in meteorology at various scales (small scales in the turbulent boundary layer, mesoscales, and synoptic planetary scales). Use of LES will soon enable us to predict the transport and mixing of pollution. LES is used in the ocean for understanding mixing due to vertical convection and stratification and also for understanding horizontal mesoscale eddies. LES should be very useful for understanding the generation of Earth's magnetic field in the turbulent outer mantle and as a tool for studying planetary and stellar dynamics.
In 1949, in an unpublished report to the U.S. Office of Naval Research, John von Neumann remarked of turbulence that
the great importance of turbulence requires no further emphasis. Turbulence undoubtedly represents a central principle for many parts of physics, and a thorough understanding of its properties must be expected to lead to advances in many fields. … [T]urbulence represents per se an important principle in physical theory and in pure mathematics. … These considerations justify the view that a considerable effort towards a detailed understanding of the mechanisms of turbulence is called for. …
Few people today would disagree with these comments on the importance of understanding turbulence and, as implied, of its prediction. And, although the turbulence problem has still yet to be “solved,” our understanding of turbulence has significantly advanced since that time; this progress has come through a combination of theoretical studies, often ingenious experiments, and judicious numerical simulations. In addition, from this understanding, our ability to predict, or at least to model, turbulence has greatly improved; methods to predict turbulent flows using large-eddy simulation (LES) are the main focus of the present book.
The impact of von Neumann is still felt today in the prediction of turbulent flows, both in his work on numerical methods and in the people and the research he has influenced. The genesis of the method of large-eddy simulation (or possibly more appropriately, “simulation des grandes échelles”) was in the early 1960s with the research of Joe Smagorinsky. At the time, Smagorinsky was working in von Neumann's group at Princeton, developing modeling for dissipation and diffusion in numerical weather prediction.
Compressible turbulence has extremely important applications in subsonic, supersonic, and hypersonic aerodynamics. More generally, and even at low Mach numbers, strong density differences caused by intense heating (in combustion for instance) may have profound consequences on the flow structure and the associated mixing. Heating a wall may, for instance, completely destabilize a boundary layer, as will be shown for some applications in this chapter. The chapter is organized as follows. We will first present the compressible LES formalism for an ideal gas in a simple way, allowing us to generalize the use of incompressible subgrid models. This is possible using the concept of density-weighted Favre filtering together with the introduction of a macropressure and a macrotemperature related by the ideal-gas state equation. Then we will study compressible mixing layers at varying convective Mach numbers. Afterward we will consider low or moderate Mach numbers in boundary layers, channel, cavities, and separated flows and also a transonic rectangular cavity. A supersonic application relating to the European space shuttle Hermés rear-flap heating during atmospheric reentry will be discussed in detail. This problem, studied in Grenoble in 1993, has acquired a tragic topicality with the loss of the American Columbia shuttle on February 1, 2003. The latter disintegrated during reentry at an approximate elevation of 60 km and a speed of 21,000 km/h while making a turn at an angle of 57°. It seems that the left wing overheated, possibly because of damage to the protection tiles during takeoff.
We have clearly shown in the former chapters the advantages of the spectral eddy-viscosity models with, in particular, the possibility of accounting for local or semilocal effects in the neighborhood of the cutoff. More details on this point may be found in Sagaut, which contains many advanced aspects on LES modeling. However, in most industrial or environmental applications, the complexity of the computational domain prohibits the use of spectral methods. One thus has to deal with numerical codes written in physical space and employing finite-volume or finite-differences methods often with unstructured grids. This last point will not be considered in this book, although it is crucial for practical applications. We will present, however, simulations on orthogonal grids of mesh size varying in direction and location and sometimes in curvilinear geometry. This chapter will mainly be devoted to models of the structure-function family with applications to isotropic turbulence, free-shear and separated flows, and boundary layers. We will also present in less detail alternative models such as the dynamic structure-function model, hyperviscosity model, mixed structure-function/hyperviscous model, and the mixed model.
Structure-function model
Formalism
The structure-function (SF) model is an attempt to go beyond the Smagorinsky model while keeping in physical space the same scalings as in spectral eddy-viscosity models. The original SF model is due to Métais and Lesieur.