A useful way to solve a complex problem – whether in physics, mathematics, or life in general – is to break it down into smaller pieces that can be handled more easily. This is especially true of the Ising model. In this chapter, we investigate various partial-summation techniques in which a subset of Ising spins is summed over to produce new, effective couplings among the remaining spins. These methods are useful in their own right and are even more important when used as a part of position-space renormalization-group techniques.

In the chapters so far, we have studied a number of exact methods of calculation for Ising models. These studies culminated in the exact solution for an infinite one-dimensional Ising model, as well as the corresponding solution on a 2 × ∞ lattice. Neither of these systems shows a phase transition, however. In this chapter, we start with Onsager’s exact solution for the two-dimensional lattice, which quite famously does have a phase transition. Next, we explore exact series expansions from low and high temperature, and show how these results can be combined, via the concept of duality, to give the exact location of the phase transition in two dimensions.

In Chapter 3 we explored transformations where a finite group of Ising spins is summed to produce effective interactions among the remaining spins. In all of these cases a finite sum of Boltzmann factors is sufficient to solve the problem. We turn now to infinite systems, where a straightforward, brute-force summation is not possible. Instead, we develop a number of new techniques that allow us to evaluate an infinite summation in full detail.

Kenneth Wilson introduced the renormalization-group (RG) approach in 1971. This approach gave new life to the study of the Ising model. The implications of this breakthrough were immediately recognized by researchers in the field, and Wilson and the RG technique were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics soon thereafter. One of the distinguishing features of RG methods is that they explicitly include the effects of fluctuations. In addition, the RG approach gives a natural understanding of the universality that is seen in critical phenomena in general, and in critical exponents in particular. In many respects, the RG approach gives a deeper understanding not only of the Ising model itself, but of all aspects of critical phenomena. The original version of the renormalization-group method was implemented in momentum space – which is a bit like studying a system with Fourier transforms. It is beyond the scope of this presentation. Following that, various investigators extended the approach to position space, which is more intuitive in many ways and is certainly much easier to visualize. We present the basics of position-space renormalization group methods in this chapter. We will also explain the origin of the terms “renormalization” and “group” in the RG part of the name.

In this chapter, we explore Ising systems that consist of just one or a few spins. We define a Hamiltonian for each system and then carry out straightforward summations over all the spin states to obtain the partition function. No phase transitions occur in these systems – in fact, an infinite system is needed to produce the singularities that characterize phase transitions. Even so, our study of finite systems yields a number of results and insights that are important to the study of infinite systems.

Few models in theoretical physics have been studied for as long, or in as much detail, as the Ising model. It’s the simplest model to display a nontrivial phase transition, and as such it plays a unique role in theoretical physics. In addition, the Ising model can be applied to a wide range of physical systems, from magnets and binary liquid mixtures, to adsorbed monolayers and superfluids, to name just a few. In this chapter, we present some of the background material that sets the stage for a detailed study of the Ising model in the chapters to come.

This chapter discusses two different approaches to describing fluid flow: a Lagrangian approach (following a fluid element as it moves) and a Eulerian approach (watching fluid pass through a fixed volume in space). Understanding each of these descriptions of flow is needed to fully understand the dynamics of fluids. This chapter is devoted to diving into the differences between the two descriptions of fluid motion. Understanding this chapter will help tremendously in the understanding of the upcoming chapters when the Navier–Stokes equations and energy equation are discussed. This chapter will introduce the material derivative. It is extremely important to understand this derivative before the Navier–Stokes equations themselves are tackled.