To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Schools are dynamic environments. Change is a given in contemporary schools, and may include ‘continuous structural school-wide changes, in terms of curriculum, assessment and leadership’ which leaves school leaders and staff ‘accustomed to both improbability and uncertainty, in terms of what constitutes as best practice when orchestrating change and leading whole school improvement’ (Gear & Sood, 2021, p. 2).
Good schools consistently strive to embrace change where needed, in order to enhance their capacity to meet students’ educative, social and emotional needs. As such, regular revision of practice to align with evidence, emerging requirements and issues will always be a part of schools’ operational processes. Not all attempted changes within schools are successfully implemented, so this cannot be taken for granted. Given its ubiquity, and in some cases, questionable previous implementation, proposed change in schools is often reasonably met with weariness and apathy (Grant, 2009). Moving towards, or strengthening an existing reading culture is a change that will require careful management to garner optimal stakeholder support, and this chapter will provide guidance to this end.
Change management
Simplistically, change management in schools can be viewed as the transformation of a school-based culture, curriculum, system, process and/or environment ‘from one status to another in a planned or unplanned manner’ (Hoşgörür, 2016, p. 2030). As such, change within schools is not always carefully planned and delivered; it can occur spontaneously, or due to unforeseen events such as the onset of a global pandemic. Ideally, we want major changes that reshape school practices and cultures to be informed by careful implementation planning and close consideration of how to best facilitate change management. As such, across contexts, planned change management involves enacting ‘deliberate activities that move an organization from its present state to a desired future state’ (Stouten et al., 2018, p. 752).
Having a research supported but also practical understanding of how best to plan for building a reading culture, and facilitate change management successfully within your school, is a transferable skillset that you can draw upon beyond this project. Much has been written on the topic of change management, though this literature is typically focused on change management within corporations and professional workplaces more generally, rather than specifically on schools.
What do we owe current and future generations of young people? Although there are many ways to respond to this question, most agree that we owe them an education that prepares them for the future. This chapter describes how approach this goal requires us to think differently about the future. Specifically, recognizing that there is not one future but multiple futures. Moreover, it highlights how we need new scenarios for possible futures which go beyond focusing on likely futures and toward preparing young people to navigate unkown futures.
Reporting can be a very satisfying opportunity to reflect on and showcase what you have achieved as a school.
You put in the time and effort to implement a whole school reading culture, and the school's achievements should be celebrated. You will need to ensure that your stakeholders remain abreast of what you have achieved, so you will be reporting to diverse audiences. To this end, this chapter is primarily concerned with determining avenues and audiences for reporting for impact across the project, with the argument for the importance of early stakeholder communication already articulated in Chapter 3. I will not be going into detail on internal reporting, because every educator has some knowledge of reporting to the ‘usual’ parties (e.g. school leadership). I’m sure you will establish and maintain reporting to these stakeholders without needing any guidance from me.
Instead, I focus on external reporting, and encourage you to consider how you might expand the scope of your reporting so that what you achieved, and how you achieved it, can contribute to the body of knowledge related to creating a whole school reading culture beyond your immediate school community. I know that this may push some of you outside your comfort zones, but it is definitely worth considering, for the reasons I will delve into in-depth herein.
Ethical reporting
Before we look at different mechanisms for reporting, we need to place the need for ethical reporting front and centre. We need to ensure that our reporting does no harm, particularly given that research conducted in schools, by schools, does not typically collect student consent for participation.
The first priority in reporting is to adhere to ethical standards. We can do this by considering the following.
Remove identifying information before reporting
Where students have contributed their thoughts, experiences and views, we have an obligation to protect this contribution from being associated with them, particularly when accessible by external parties, and where there could be foreseeable negative consequences for these participants. Research suggests that ‘children and adolescents are most willing to participate in research when they feel safe’ (Crane & Broome, 2017, p. 205), and removing identifying information before reporting is one way that protection from exposure to external scrutiny for individual participants can be managed. This may involve using pseudonyms or ‘blinding’ the work by adding (student's name) in parentheses. Pseudonyms are definitely preferred for readability.
Although educating for likely futures has its place, the central argument presented in this chapter is that preparing young people for uncertain futures requires a fundamentally different logic of design. To that end, the logic of ’uncertainty x design’ (UxD) is introduced and presented. A discussion of why this new design logic is needed is also provided.
Think back on your own time at school, and ask yourself the following questions:
1 Did your school encourage you to have a lifelong love of reading, or was it perhaps only concerned with reading for the purposes of assessment?
2 If you feel that your school encouraged you to have a lifelong love of reading, what was it about your school that led you to this conclusion?
Given that this book is focused on imagining and creating a reading culture, and fostering a lifelong reader identity in young people, critically reflecting on your own experiences as a student can be a good place to start.
Perhaps you found yourself within a richly supportive environment, where reading was celebrated, encouraged and supported. As explored in this book, and as you may recollect if this was your experience, schools can communicate valuing of reading in many diverse ways.
Alternatively, your school may have been a space where enjoyment of reading was positioned as peripheral and irrelevant. If this was you, and yet you are an avid reader, your love of reading may have been fostered at home, never nurtured within your school.
One of the key purposes of this book is to enable you to identify and harness the approaches, resources, and strategies that contribute to a school reading culture whether you had prior exposure to them or not. Even a thriving school reading culture can benefit from new insights that can make the culture even more effective, and help you to foster a love of reading in all of your students.
School culture is influential
Students spend so much time at school, it is vital that the activities, experiences and school cultures they are exposed to build their capacity as lifelong learners who will continue to develop their knowledge and skills in adulthood. Students in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries spend an average of 7,590 hours of required instruction at primary and secondary school (OECD, 2019a), which is no small chunk of time. They are at a formative stage of their lives, and their schooling experiences can have a significant impact on their current and future trajectories. Unsurprisingly, the kinds of learning environments that students experience in their schools impact on their academic achievement (e.g. MacNeil et al., 2009), but students’ experiences in school can also shape their behaviours and beliefs well beyond their schooling years.
I hope that by the time you reach this stage of the book, you arrive with strengthened confidence in your ability to roll out or rejuvenate a whole school reading culture in your context.
While I have presented a vast array of options and pathways with research support that you might pursue, please use this book as a tool to inform rather than dictate your choices. Please seek to establish a whole school reading culture that reflects the unique needs of your school, following the process that resonates with you and your team, and aligns with your current resourcing constraints.
Literacy proponents and policymakers often fall into the trap of proposing that a single solution can be the answer to all students’ literacy problems. As I have explored extensively elsewhere, this is almost always problematic given that learners have diverse strengths, needs and backgrounds (Merga, 2020a). While building students’ motivation and opportunities to read in a reading-supportive culture can make a big difference to students’ literacy attainment, specific targeted interventions that address students’ literacy gaps, as well as cover the required literacy curriculum, will be needed too.
While not the only essential literacy initiative for schools, increasing reading engagement by fostering a whole school reading culture using research-supported strategies can transform students’ literacy learning, as well as their attitudes towards reading and related literacy-supportive activities. It will probably not independently solve all issues concerned with literacy that your students face, and ‘integration of direct skills instruction and motivation interventions might produce synergistic effects and optimize gains in reading performance over time’ (Toste et al., 2020, p. 446). To this end, you go a long way towards enhancing student literacy when you pay close attention to making gains in motivation and opportunities to read, while also offering a range of additional targeted literacy interventions as explored in my previous book (Merga, 2023b) and through the work of many other researchers. Many of the strategies that underpin a whole school reading culture yield significant gains for SLLs in particular (e.g. reading aloud to SLLs as explored by Westbrook et al., 2019), so a whole school reading culture can play a key role in closing the gap for these students as part of a multifaceted strategy.
This ‘avanti’ briefly highlights how the possibilities presented in the book serve as a starting point, which can be carried forward by educators, students, researchers, and anyone interested in working toward more promising educational futures.
As I explore in this chapter, there is a wealth of research exploring the benefits of a range of socially and environmentally mediated practices designed to build reading engagement and a reading culture in a school. Simply, reading engagement cannot continue to be ignored as a crucial support for enhancing students’ literacy performance. We need to foster whole school reading cultures that seek to improve students’ attitudes towards and frequency of engagement in literacy-supportive practices such as reading, and do this alongside the explicit literacy skills instruction that ideally should be occurring across subject areas (e.g. Merga, 2023b).
As previously noted, young people who believe that reading remains important beyond learning to read are nearly twice as likely to read daily than those who did not share this view (Merga & Mat Roni, 2018a), and we cannot take for granted that students understand the importance of an ongoing commitment to reading. A survey of Australian children aged 6–17 found that only 58% of children understood that reading books for fun is highly important, and children's views on the importance of reading may decline dramatically by age (Scholastic, 2016a).
But how can we effectively encourage students to enjoy and value reading according to the research? What are evidence-supported practices when it comes to building reading engagement?
I explore research-supported practices that can feature in a whole school reading culture here, drawing on key research findings, and making reference to current research that has been released since my earlier book in this space (e.g. as reported in Merga, 2018a). While there are some good auditing tools that have been created around fostering a whole school reading culture (e.g. National Library of New Zealand, n.d.-a; n.d.-c), the links to the extant research in such tools can often be cursory, so reading this chapter will equip you to make a strong argument to support the implementation of any of the strategies detailed herein.
Opportunities for regular silent reading for pleasure
If we want young people to be readers, we need to provide opportunities for them to read. With research ‘linking volume of reading to reading achievement and oral reading fluency’, it is surprising that this educational practice is peripheral in many contemporary schools (Allington, 2014, p. 22).
This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the San Antonio v. Rodriguez case, viewed by some as the worst decision in the US Supreme Court’s modern history. As legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky observed, the court essentially declared that “discrimination against the poor does not violate the Constitution and that education is not a fundamental right.”1 Five decades later, how does this case from the past continue to exert its influence on the present? And how might the present have looked different if the court had reached a different conclusion?
For this policy dialogue, the HEQ editors asked Bruce Baker and David Hinojosa to discuss the Rodriguez decision and its legacy, focusing particularly on how the case has shaped and constrained equity efforts in K-12 education. Bruce Baker is professor and chair of the Department of Teaching and Learning at the University of Miami. A leading scholar on the financing of public elementary and secondary education systems, he is the author of Educational Inequality and School Finance (Harvard Education Press, 2018) and School Finance and Education Equity (Harvard Education Press, 2021). David Hinojosa is the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, where he spearheads the organization’s systemic racial justice work in guaranteeing that historically marginalized students of color receive equal and equitable educational opportunities in public schools and institutions of higher education. He is a leading litigator and advocate in civil rights, specializing in educational impact litigation and policy.
HEQ policy dialogues are, by design, intended to promote an informal, free exchange of ideas between scholars. At the end of the exchange, we offer a list of references for readers who wish to follow up on sources relevant to the discussion.