To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Despite five decades of analysis, many aspects of Mars crater morphology and evolution remain enigmatic, and it seems likely that new types of data will be needed to find the answers. As a final section in this chapter, we offer new approaches to solving these questions. Finding the answers will require a new orbital data set. Our recommendation is for a new data set that is comparable to many that have been collected for other planets in the Solar System and thus well within the capabilities of the National Air and Space Administration (NASA) and other international space agencies.
We take the younger examples, as illustrated in Chapter 4, and show some of the common ways that craters may be modified. Even craters that are classified as morphologically fresh may have experienced modification. This might take the form of chemical weathering of the floor or deposition of eolian or ice deposits within the crater cavity.
This chapter reviews impact craters throughout the Solar System, looking first at craters formed on Earth, where we have the best field knowledge. We then investigate craters formed on airless rocky bodies (the Moon and Mercury), where the cratering process is not affected by atmospheric effects. We follow this with a glimpse of craters on volatile-rich bodies that also lack an atmosphere, specifically Ganymede, 1 Ceres, and Charon. Here the target material is most likely water ice. Finally, we examine craters formed on bodies with thick atmospheres (Venus and Titan) to see what landforms may have been formed by the interaction of the projectile and the ejecta with the atmosphere.
Here we delve into greater detail of the morphology of individual craters. We review what the freshest, and hence the most likely youngest, craters look like.
This chapter embarks on a rigorous examination of the evolving social contracts within the Gulf states delineating their foundational role in facilitating the region’s pursuit of decarbonization, climate change adaptation, and socioeconomic diversification. The analysis delves into the intricate web of socioeconomic, political, national security, and sociocultural transformations inextricably linked to the ongoing economic restructuring within the region and assesses how these countries navigate this multifaceted transition amid a complex interplay of domestic and global pressures.
We introduce the mode of formation of craters on planetary surfaces to set the stage for comparisons of crater morphology throughout the Solar System and on Mars specifically.
This chapter offers a critical analysis of the Gulf region’s industrial transformation, identifying the 1973 oil embargo as a key moment that accelerated industrial investment. It undertakes a rigorous exploration of the geopolitical forces that sculpted the region’s economic and industrial trajectory during this pivotal era. By meticulously tracing the enduring geopolitical repercussions from the early 1970s to their contemporary manifestations, the analysis exposes the strategic economic restructuring undertaken by Gulf states in the wake of the embargo. This investigation illuminates the intrinsic interconnectedness of global politics, economic ambitions, and industrial growth within the Gulf and illustrates the profound and enduring legacy of these historical events in shaping the region’s modernization and evolving global status.
This chapter serves as the book’s culminating exploration and synthesizes the book’s core arguments, offering a critical evaluation of the Gulf states’ transformative responses to the global imperative of decarbonization. Through an assessment of historical trends, economic projections, and potential shifts in geopolitical power dynamics, the chapter constructs a comprehensive potential outlook for the Gulf region within a rapidly evolving global energy landscape. Notably, the chapter’s focus is on the critical 10–20-year window, a period during which the Gulf states must strategically navigate the complexities, capitalize on the opportunities, and effectively address the multifaceted challenges posed by decarbonization. Importantly, this chapter offers penetrating insights into the potential challenges awaiting the Gulf states. By posing the essential questions that policymakers must confront, it provides a conceptual roadmap for developing proactive strategies designed to address these challenges head-on. This focus on foresight and strategic management is fundamental to the chapter’s significance.
This chapter investigates the strategic investments by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE toward non-hydrocarbon-based energy sources. This move marks a critical juncture in the region’s energy policy landscape. Driven by a multifaceted agenda – reducing reliance on hydrocarbons, mitigating carbon emissions, and fostering a more diversified and industrially productive economy – the Gulf states are actively pursuing renewable and nuclear energy solutions. Their path, however, is fraught with obstacles, and this chapter critically examines the institutional barriers with the potential to significantly impede their progress.
This chapter explores the contested terrain of “subsidies” as applied to the Gulf region’s energy policies by multilateral organizations. It reviews how the Gulf states navigate the definitions and regulations established by international bodies such as the World Trade Organization and the International Energy Agency, and reviews the region’s defense of its energy pricing regimes in the face of international scrutiny. The chapter also analyzes how these low and regulated energy pricing frameworks, viewed as integral to the Gulf’s social contract and industrial strategy, present a challenge to established international norms and trade policies. Furthermore, this analysis extends to the strategic positioning of Gulf states within global forums, where they strive to align their energy practices with international trade standards while safeguarding their development priorities. By doing so, Gulf states aim to shape the future direction of global energy governance in a way that accommodates their specific economic and developmental needs.
The phylogeny of the highly diverse bivalve order Venerida can be traced back to the Triassic, thanks to the well-understood evolution of its hinge system. I here suggest that the Early or Middle to Late Triassic genus Pseudocorbula is at the root of this phylogenetic lineage. The hinge of Pseudocorbula is primitive relative to the Early Jurassic Eotrapezium in the lack of a chevron-shaped AII–2b complex below the umbo of the left valve. However, both Pseudocorbula and Eotrapezium lack cardinal tooth 3a in the right valve. It is suggested that this lack stimulated the evolution of cardinal tooth 1, which first appeared as a small tubercle at the posterior end of lateral tooth AI that fits below the AII–2b complex; this early stage evolved into the well-known veneroid hinge with a differentiated cardinal tooth 1 in the pivotal position below the umbo of the right valve and the 2a–2b pair of cardinal teeth in the left valve. Pseudocorbulinae new subfamily is proposed for taxa that represent the earliest stage of veneroid hinge evolution, which is placed in Isocyprinidae. This phylogenetic hypothesis extends the roots of Venerida back to the Early or early Middle Triassic, a time that also saw the first appearance of oysters and modern scallops.