Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Browse subjects
  3. Computer Science
  4. Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing
  5. Content listing

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

3312 results in Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing

Page 35 of 166

  • Lyrics segmentation via bimodal text–audio representation

  • Michael Fell, Yaroslav Nechaev, Gabriel Meseguer-Brocal, Elena Cabrio, Fabien Gandon, Geoffroy Peeters
  • Journal:
    Natural Language Engineering / Volume 28 / Issue 3 / May 2022
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 May 2021, pp. 317-336

  • Song lyrics contain repeated patterns that have been proven to facilitate automated lyrics segmentation, with the final goal of detecting the building blocks (e.g., chorus, verse) of a song text. Our contribution in this article is twofold. First, we introduce a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model that learns to segment the lyrics based on their repetitive text structure. We experiment with novel features to reveal different kinds of repetitions in the lyrics, for instance based on phonetical and syntactical properties. Second, using a novel corpus where the song text is synchronized to the audio of the song, we show that the text and audio modalities capture complementary structure of the lyrics and that combining both is beneficial for lyrics segmentation performance. For the purely text-based lyrics segmentation on a dataset of 103k lyrics, we achieve an F-score of 67.4%, improving on the state of the art (59.2% F-score). On the synchronized text–audio dataset of 4.8k songs, we show that the additional audio features improve segmentation performance to 75.3% F-score, significantly outperforming the purely text-based approaches.

Page 35 of 166