Understanding the nature of meaning and its extensions (with metaphor as one typical kind) has been one core issue in figurative language study since Aristotle’s time. This research takes a computational cognitive perspective to model metaphor based on the assumption that meaning is perceptual, embodied, and encyclopedic. We model word meaning representation for metaphor detection with embodiment information obtained from behavioral experiments. Our work is the first attempt to incorporate sensorimotor knowledge into neural networks for metaphor detection, and demonstrates superiority, consistency, and interpretability compared to peer systems based on two general datasets. In addition, with cross-sectional analysis of different feature schemas, our results suggest that metaphor, as a device of cognitive conceptualization, can be ‘learned’ from the perceptual and actional information independent of several more explicit levels of linguistic representation. The access to such knowledge allows us to probe further into word meaning mapping tendencies relevant to our conceptualization and reaction to the physical world.

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved amazing successes. They have done well on standardized tests in medicine and the law. That said, the bar has been raised so high that it could take decades to make good on expectations. To buy time for this long-term research program, the field needs to identify some good short-term applications for smooth-talking machines that are more fluent than trustworthy.

Conversational recommender system (CRS) needs to be seamlessly integrated between the two modules of recommendation and dialog, aiming to recommend high-quality items to users through multiple rounds of interactive dialogs. Items can typically refer to goods, movies, news, etc. Through this form of interactive dialog, users can express their preferences in real time, and the system can fully understand the user’s thoughts and recommend corresponding items. Although mainstream dialog recommendation systems have improved the performance to some extent, there are still some key issues, such as insufficient consideration of the entity’s order in the dialog, the different contributions of items in the dialog history, and the low diversity of generated responses. To address these shortcomings, we propose an improved dialog context model based on time-series features. Firstly, we augment the semantic representation of words and items using two external knowledge graphs and align the semantic space using mutual information maximization techniques. Secondly, we add a retrieval model to the dialog recommendation system to provide auxiliary information for generating replies. We then utilize a deep timing network to serialize the dialog content and more accurately learn the feature relationship between users and items for recommendation. In this paper, the dialog recommendation system is divided into two components, and different evaluation indicators are used to evaluate the performance of the dialog component and the recommendation component. Experimental results on widely used benchmarks show that the proposed method is effective.

Identifying and annotating toxic online content on social media platforms is an extremely challenging problem. Work that studies toxicity in online content has predominantly focused on comments as independent entities. However, comments on social media are inherently conversational, and therefore, understanding and judging the comments fundamentally requires access to the context in which they are made. We introduce a study and resulting annotated dataset where we devise a number of controlled experiments on the importance of context and other observable confounders – namely gender, age and political orientation – towards the perception of toxicity in online content. Our analysis clearly shows the significance of context and the effect of observable confounders on annotations. Namely, we observe that the ratio of toxic to non-toxic judgements can be very different for each control group, and a higher proportion of samples are judged toxic in the presence of contextual information.

GPT-3 is a large-scale natural language model developed by OpenAI that can perform many different tasks, including topic classification. Although researchers claim that it requires only a small number of in-context examples to learn a task, in practice GPT-3 requires these training examples to be either of exceptional quality or a higher quantity than easily created by hand. To address this issue, this study teaches GPT-3 to classify whether a question is related to data science by augmenting a small training set with additional examples generated by GPT-3 itself. This study compares two augmented classifiers: the Classification Endpoint with an increased training set size and the Completion Endpoint with an augmented prompt optimized using a genetic algorithm. We find that data augmentation significantly increases the accuracy of both classifiers, and that the embedding-based Classification Endpoint achieves the best accuracy of about 76%, compared to human accuracy of 85%. In this way, giving large language models like GPT-3 the ability to propose their own training examples can improve short text classification performance.

Recent developments in text style transfer have led this field to be more highlighted than ever. There are many challenges associated with transferring the style of input text such as fluency and content preservation that need to be addressed. In this research, we present PGST, a novel Persian text style transfer approach in the gender domain, composed of different constituent elements. Established on the significance of parts of speech tags, our method is the first that successfully transfers the gendered linguistic style of Persian text. We have proceeded with a pre-trained word embedding for token replacement purposes, a character-based token classifier for gender exchange purposes, and a beam search algorithm for extracting the most fluent combination. Since different approaches are introduced in our research, we determine a trade-off value for evaluating different models’ success in faking our gender identification model with transferred text. Our research focuses primarily on Persian, but since there is no Persian baseline available, we applied our method to a highly studied gender-tagged English corpus and compared it to state-of-the-art English variants to demonstrate its applicability. Our final approach successfully defeated English and Persian gender identification models by 45.6% and 39.2%, respectively.

This paper explores how to syntactically parse Ancient Greek texts automatically and maps ways of fruitfully employing the results of such an automated analysis. Special attention is given to documentary papyrus texts, a large diachronic corpus of non-literary Greek, which presents a unique set of challenges to tackle. By making use of the Stanford Graph-Based Neural Dependency Parser, we show that through careful curation of the parsing data and several manipulation strategies, it is possible to achieve an Labeled Attachment Score of about 0.85 for this corpus. We also explain how the data can be converted back to its original (Ancient Greek Dependency Treebanks) format. We describe the results of several tests we have carried out to improve parsing results, with special attention paid to the impact of the annotation format on parser achievements. In addition, we offer a detailed qualitative analysis of the remaining errors, including possible ways to solve them. Moreover, the paper gives an overview of the valorisation possibilities of an automatically annotated corpus of Ancient Greek texts in the fields of linguistics, language education and humanities studies in general. The concluding section critically analyses the remaining difficulties and outlines avenues to further improve the parsing quality and the ensuing practical applications.